Friday, April 13, 2018

There is no apology or correction from Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara for the books they wrote on Vatican Council II.They need to apologise for their ignorance, which was innocent.

Image result for Photo of Chris  Ferrara traditionalist old massImage result for Photo of Roberto dei Mattei
There is no apology or correction from Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara for the books they wrote on Vatican Council II.They need to apologize for their ignorance, which was innocent.There was no one there to correct them at that time.But now they know and should clarify that it was an error.
Now they know that if the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) refers to invisible or visible cases, decides how Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) will be interpreted.
Since BOD,BOB and I.I were exceptions to EENS in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, Vatican Council II became an exception to EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.LG 8, LG 16 etc were considered visible people known to be saved outside the Catholic Church. It was initially wrongly assumed, by Mattei and Ferrara,that BOD, BOB and I.I referred to visible cases, exceptions to EENS.
This was an irrational premise.
For me BOD, BOB and I.I are not exceptions or relevant to traditional EENS, since for me they refer to hypothetical cases, they are abstract images, speculation,theories.They are not concrete and real people.They can only be real and known in Heaven.So since they do not exist in the present times on earth they cannot be exceptions to EENS.The liberal theologians made a mistake.Archbishop Lefebvre did not notice it.
So in the books on Vatican Council II written by Ferrara and Mattei, Vatican Council II is projected as a rupture with Tradition since the writers mixed up what is invisible and as being visible.They then projected these unknowable people as being known examples of salvation outside the Church.
When they wrote their books, Vatican Council II could also have been projected as a continuity with Tradition and the dogma EENS.
So the Magisterium of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), made a mistake at that time.Since the CDF Prefect assumed that unknown people were known it was an objective mistake.Since he assumed that people in Heaven saved, were visible on earth, it was a factual mistake.Since he assumed that people in Heaven were also present on earth at the same time,he violated the Principle of Non Contradiction.
The same mistake unknowingly, was made by Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, Attila Guimares, Michael Davies and Diterich von Hildebrand in their books and articles.
In their books they were saying that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition.This was true.Since a false premise is used.The educated Catholic recognizes the non traditional conclusion.
Even Pope John Paul II was aware of the rupture with Tradition.However what was not known to also Fr.John Hardon, Fr. William Most, Monsgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton and other good apologists, was that the actual false premise was visible for us BOD,BOB and I.I and it caused the rupture with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology etc).
Now that Ferrara and Mattei know, there must be an apology or correction from them.Soon there will be the summer conferences of the traditionalists where the same error will be repeated,like in former years, even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades



 APRIL 12, 2018



Like the liberals Roberto dei Mattei uses an irrational premise to interpret the baptism of desire etc. So there is a new version of EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/like-tbe-liberals-roberto-dei-mattei.html




APRIL 12, 2018




Roberto dei Mattei is politically correct like the two popes and in heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/roberto-dei-mattei-is-politically.html



APRIL 12, 2018



Repost : So the fault does not lie with Vatican Council II but with the traditionalist interpretation of the Council by using Cushingite instead of Feeneyite theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-so-fault-does-not-lie-with.html




 APRIL 12, 2018

Repost : Vatican needs to apologise for the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-vatican-needs-to-apologise-for.html




APRIL 12, 2018

The Great Façade: The Regime of Novelty in the Catholic Church from Vatican II to the Francis RevoluImage result for Photo books of Archbishop Marcel LefebvreImage result for Photo books of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre


Repost : Books of Archbishop Lefebvre are obsolete now : so are the writings on Vatican Council II by Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-books-of-archbishop-lefebvre-are.html




APRIL 12, 2018

Repost : No contradiction or correction from Roberto dei Mattei
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-no-contradiction-or-correction.html



DECEMBER 12, 2017

Neither is Roberto dei Mattei nor Maike Hickson willing to affirm the old ecclesiology of the Church with Feeneyite EENS and with such a big doctrinal and theological divide among us they are talking about the pope being in heresy http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/neither-is-roberto-dei-mattei-not-maike.html




APRIL 12, 2018

Repost : The traditionalists in general have made an error.They have made a major error in theology and doctrine
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-traditionalists-in-general-have.html





APRIL 12, 2018

Repost : I am waiting for Cardinal Burke, Bishop Schneider, Robero dei Mattei and Chris Ferrara to affirm Vatican Council II and the strict interpretation of EENS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-i-am-waiting-for-cardinal-burke.html





APRIL 11, 2018

Roberto dei Mattei still cannot state that Lumen Gentium does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Neither will he affirm the dogma EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/roberto-dei-mattei-still-cannot-state.html


APRIL 4, 2018


Repost : Father Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari were also unknowingly following the new theology http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-father-nicholas-gruner-and-john.html


APRIL 4, 2018


Repost : Fr.Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari did not know

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-frnicholas-gruner-and-john.html

 APRIL 4, 2018



Repost : Christopher Ferrara, John Vennari and Fr.Nicholas Gruner express the new theology on Vatican Council II : it has a factual error, an objective mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-christopher-ferrara-john-vennari.html



APRIL 4, 2018


Repost : If we eliminate the 'known exceptions' theory, Cardinal Marx and Cardinal Kasper would have to admit that there is no change in doctrine : Vatican Council II supports the 16th century Jesuit missionaries

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-if-we-eliminate-known-exceptions.html


APRIL 4, 2018



Repost : There is only one cause for the confusion. It has to be identified and corrected and then we have the old theology at Mass.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-there-is-only-one-cause-for.html



 APRIL 4, 2018



Repost :John Vennari assumes being saved in invincble ignorance is an exception to the dogma

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-john-vennari-assumes-being-saved.html


APRIL 4, 2018


Repost : There being exceptions is the irrational reasoning used to interpret Vatican Council II by John Vennari, Chris Ferrara, John Salza and Louie Verrecchio : more mistakes by John Vennari

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/repost-there-being-exceptions-is.html





No comments: