Thursday, April 26, 2018

When will Father Matthias Gaudron, of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) comment on Pope Benedict's errors on Vatican Council II when it is relevant to the SSPX-Vatican Reconciliation


Comment from the blog The Epoymous Flower
When will Father Matthias Gaudron, of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) comment on this when it is relevant to the SSPX-Vatican Reconciliation.


APRIL 19, 2017
Pope Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism: he chose heresy and the hermeneutic of rupture
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/pope-benedict-xvi-could-have.html

DECEMBER 8, 2017
Pope Benedict's entire false theology is pegged on there being known salvation outside the Church.When in reality we do not know any such casehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/pope-benedicts-entire-false-theology-is.html

MARCH 15, 2017
Pope Benedict XVI means there is known salvation outside the Church when he states 'when they can be saved even without it?” '. He is a Cushingite. He assumes invisible cases are visible
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/pope-benedict-xvi-means-there-is-known.html

JUNE 22, 2016
Objectively heretical writings of Pope Benedict XVI ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/objectively-heretical-writings-of-pope.html

Pope Benedict's Avvenire interview contradicts the SSPX General Chapter Statement on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council IIhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/pope-benedicts-avvenire-interview.html

When Pope Benedict 'breaks his silence' it usually is to please the Masons? 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/when-pope-benedict-breaks-his-silence.html

April 7,2014
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J and Pope Benedict XVI made a factual error : Analysis http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/04/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-and-pope.html#links


-Lionel Andrades



http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2018/04/critical-observations-on-joseph.html#comment-form





No comments: