Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j ,Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith made an objective mistake in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission

PRELIMINARY NOTE
The study of the theme "Christianity and the World Religions" was adopted for study by a large majority of the members of the International Theological Commission and Rev. Luis F. Ladaria, S.J. was the president.
 General discussion on this theme took place during several meetings of the subcommission and in the plenary sessions of the International Theological Commission held at Rome in 1993, 1994 and 1995. The present text was approved "in forma specifica" by vote of the commission on 30 September 1996 and was submitted to its president, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, who has given his approval for its publication.
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_1997_cristianesimo-religioni_en.html



 PRELIMINARY NOTE
 The theme “The Hope of Salvation for Infants who Die Without Being Baptized” was placed under the study of the International Theological Commission. In order to prepare for this study, a Committee was formed... The Committee also received the collaboration of Rev. Luis Ladaria, SJ, the Secretary General of the International Theological Commission, and Msgr. Guido Pozzo, the Assistant to the ITC, as well as other members of the Commission. The general discussion on the theme took place during the plenary sessions of the ITC, held in Rome. In October 2005 and October 2006. This present text was approved in forma specifica by the members of the Commission, and was subsequently submitted to its President, Cardinal William Levada who, upon receiving the approval of the Holy father(Pope Benedict) in an audience granted on January 19, 2007, approved the text for publication.
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html

Image result for Cardinal Luiz Ladaria graphics


Fr.Luiz Ladaria s.j, now Cardinal Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission assumed possibilities of salvation were actual, known people saved outside the Church and so were exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
Possibilities of salvation are not real people in 2018.Possibilities of non Catholics being saved outside the Catholic Church are not real people known to us.They can only be known to God if they exist.
Here is the proof.

CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS

66. In his encyclical Mystici Corporis, Pius XII addresses the question, How are those who attain salvation outside visible communion with the Church related to her? He says that they are oriented to the mystical body of Christ by a yearning and desire of which they are not aware (DS 3821).( But this is a reference  by Pope Pius XII to hypothetical and invisible cases.This is something obvious.It is common sense.This is only a possibility and not a real person known to us humans.) The opposition of the American Jesuit Leonard Feeney, who insisted on the exclusivist interpretation of the expression extra ecclesiam nulla solus, afforded the occasion for the letter of the Holy Office, dated 8 August ,1949, to the archbishop of Boston, which rejected Feeney s interpretation and clarified the teaching of Pius XII. (So he means hypothetical cases are objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.He means a possibility is an objective exception to Feeneyite EENS.)  The letter distinguishes between the necessity of belonging to the Church for salvation (necessitas praecepti) and the necessity of the indispensable means of salvation (intrinseca necessitas); in relationship to the latter, the Church is a general help for salvation (DS 3867—69).(O.K,Hypothetically but what has this to do with EENS ? The Letter made an irrational inference too.A possibility, theoretical speculation is not a known non  Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.)  In the case of invincible ignorance the implicit desire of belonging to the Church suffices; this desire will always be present when a man aspires to conform his will to that of God (DS 3870).(Again he is referring to an unknown person so why is this mentioned with reference to EENS? Why? Since his  new theology is Cushingite.It is based on possibilities being physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church. Then it is inferred that these 'invisible visible people are exceptions to tradtiional EENS.But faith, in the sense of Hebrews 11:6, and love are always necessary with intrinsic necessity (DS 3872).
67. Vatican Council II makes its own the expression extra ecclesiam nulla salus. But in using it the council explicitly directs itself to Catholics and limits its validity to those who know the necessity of the Church for salvation.(Since he is a Cushingite he interprets Lumen Gentium 14 as referring to known people saved outside the Church and so there are known people saved in invincible ignorance.So only those who know and are not in ignorance need to enter the Church for him and not all non Catholics in general. This is one of the heights of Cushingism.If someone was saved in invincible ignorance it would only be knwon to God and it would be speculative for us humans.But for Cardinal Ladaria it is a known person saved outside the Church,otherwise how coult it be an exception to EENS. So it is no more a possibility only for him.The council holds that the affirmation is based on the necessity of faith and of baptism affirmed by Christ (LG 14). In this way the council aligned itself in continuity with the teaching of Pius XII,( The teaching of Pope Pius XII on EENS with known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.Unknown cases are known exceptions. This is Cushingism again.) but emphasized more clearly the original parenthentical character of this expression.(Vaguely supporting Cushingism)
68. In contrast to Pius XII, the council refused to speak of a votum implicitum (implicit desire) and applied the concept of the votum only to the explicit desire of catechumens to belong to the Church (LG 14).(The catechumen who is saved with implicit or explicit desire is a hypothetical case. So why is it mentioned here ? Since it is not a hypothetical case for Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria s.j. They are Cushingites.Hypothetical cases, theoretical possibilities are mistaken as objective exceptions to EENS). With regard to non-Christians, it said that they are ordered in diverse ways to the people of God.(He does not say that they are all oriented to Hell. Since that would be the traditional Feeneyite theology with unknown cases not known exceptions to traditional EENS) In accord with the different ways with which the salvific will of God embraces non-Christians, the council distinguished four groups: first, Jews; second, Muslims; third, those who without fault are ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and do not know the Church but who search for God with a sincere heart and try to fulfill his will as known through conscience; fourth, those who without fault have not yet reached an express knowledge of God but who nonetheless try to lead a good life (LG 16). (Being a Cushingite he saying here that the exceptions are the ordinary means of salvation. He also contradicts the latter part of his Cushingite Redemptoris Missio.Possibilites, theoretical cases are assumed to be exceptions to EENS. Here they are the norm, teh ordinary means of salvation for Cardinal Ladaria.

THE HOPE OF SALVATION FOR INFANTS WHO DIE WITHOUT BEING BAPTIZED


58. In the face of new problems and situations and of an exclusive interpretation of the adage(it was a dogma  defined by three Church Councils in the Extraordinary Magisterium and not an adage)salus extra ecclesiam non est”, (it was always extra ecclesiam nulla salus) the magisterium, in recent times, has articulated a more nuanced understanding as to the manner in which a saving relationship with the Church can be realized.(He is referring to his Cushingite interpretation. His 'nuanced version' of course is not the traditional exclusivist understanding of salvation.For him possibilities, hypothetical cases are real people, known non Catholics saved outside the Church.) The Allocution of Pope Pius IX, Singulari Quadam (1854) clearly states the issues involved: “It must, of course, be held as a matter of faith that outside the apostolic Roman Church no one can be saved, that the Church is the only ark of salvation, and that whoever does not enter it, will perish in the flood.(This is traditional Feeneyite theology which he will contradict in the next line by assuming unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church for salvation) On the other hand, it must likewise be held as certain that those who live in ignorance of the true religion, if such ignorance be invincible, are not subject to any guilt in this matter before the eyes of the Lord” (In other words they are exceptions to EENS  for the ITC and so there is no more an exclusive interpretation.This is his familiar Cushingite theology. Possibilities of being saved in invincible ignorance are visible and known examples of salvation outside the Church. So the dogma EENS has explicit exceptions is his reasoning.) 
THE HOPE OF SALVATION FOR INFANTS  WHO DIE WITHOUT BEING BAPTISED http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html  1

-Lionel Andrades

1
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/this-is-scandal.html

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/redemptoris-missio-and-dominus-iesus-of.html


____________________________________________________

MAY 15, 2018

Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistakeImage result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake
Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistakeImage result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake

CDF still does not comment : Cardinal Ladaria made an objective mistake on March 1, 2018, LG 8 is not an exception to EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cdf-still-does-not-comment-cardinal.html


Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistakeImage result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake

Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistakeImage result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake


Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistakeImage result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake
Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistakeImage result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake
Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistakeImage result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake
Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistakeImage result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake
Image result for Graphics on Cardinal Ladaria objective mistake

No comments: