Dr.Taylor Marshall's New St. Thomas Institute offers a one year course on apologetics in which all magisterial documents are interpreted with irrational and innovative Cushingism instead of the traditional Feeneyite theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. So he interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
Dr.Marshall wants to be faithful to the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church and especially Aquinas. But he causes a rupture with Tradition when he uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II.
This was also the issue at the traditional Fischer More College where he was a professor.He did not want to reject Vatican Council II as did some of the faculty members who wanted to remain faithful to Tradition.
He did not know that Vatican Council II interpreted with the invisible- people- are- visible- premise causes a rupture with Tradition. Vatican Council II interpreted without this premise, does not result in a break with the dogma EENS or the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
So it was possible for the Fischer More College to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and also affirm Tradition. They would have to reject Vatican Council II (Cushingite) only which was causing the breach and which was magisterial and accepted by the local bishop and FSSP priests.But it was not known at that time.
Dr. Marshall is offering his apologetics course based on Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and this still seems the only interpretation of the Council he knows.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment