English bishops are denying Church teaching on salvation in doctrine and practise

DO NOT EXPECT A REPLY
I have e-mailed this blog post to the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminister and to the Archbishop of Liverpool. 1 I do not expect them to reply.Since they have rejected Catholic doctrine and are following instructions from the enemies of the Church.
In this blog post I have said that they have rejected Catholic doctrine on exclusive salvation by using a false  premise to create a heretical conclusion.So there is a rupture with Tradition.They have a rational and traditional choice before them.But will intentionally avoid it.

I have been writing to them for a long time.I wrote to Bishop Arthur Roche when he was the bishop of Leeds. He and the priests and religious instructors of his diocese did nothing. They had to please the people who would then appoint Roche  Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Vatican.

ARTHUR ROCHE REJECTS EENS AT TLM

Roche rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), as do the Archbishops in Westminister and Liverpool.He expects all those who offer the Traditional Latin Mass to do the same. So the TLM is doctrinally a rupture with the TLM in the 16th century.

For the English bishops and our two liberal popes, unknown cases of the baptism of desire etc are known in the present times. Since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church for them,  they say that the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is obsolete. So they interpret all hypothetical cases in Vatican Council II (LG 8, LG 16, GS 22 etc) as being non hypothetical and examples of known salvation outside the Church. In other words they know of people who are in Heaven without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church. This is irrational but this is the standard reasoning of the English bishops which allows them to project Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.


NICOLS REJECTS FAITH AND MORAL TEACHINGS

Cardinal Vince Nicols who has recently approved euthanasia in practice, in the Alfie Evans case, has rejected the Church's teachings on faith and salvation and stays in office since he has the political support of the Left.He  has thrown out the Catholic Church's traditional and defide teachings on exclusivist salvation. He has rejected it doctrinally and also in practice ;  in discipline, in inter-religious dialogue, evangelisation and Catechetics.

There is no denial. 

NO DENIAL: TEACHINGS ON SALVATION REJECTED IN DOCTRINE AND PRACTICE

The Catholic bishops in Britain have changed the Church's teachings on salvation, in doctrine and practice.

Of course he has also changed the Catholic Church's teachings on morals in practice and doctrine. But they pay lip service to moral doctrine, and say the correct things  while in practice they have done away with traditional teaching.There are  known exceptions to the general moral  rule, they people in manifest mortal sin who are not in sin and would go to Heaven if they die immediately.

THEY CANNOT AFFIRM DOCTRINE ON  SALVATION AS THEY CAN DO ON MORALS

But on salvation they are unable to say that they affirm the traditional doctrine of the Church.

The deception on moral theology will not work They cannot say that the affirm Catholic exclusivist ecclesiology. Here's where they are stuck.

Note: they affirm doctrines on morals but reject it pastorally.But they do not affirm doctrines on faith( salvation) and they reject it pastorally, practically. Salvation theology is rejected in  doctrine and practise by these liberals.

THEY CANNOT PROVE ME WRONG AND AFFIRM TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE ON SALVATION

So the English bishops ignore what I write.They cannot  say that I am wrong. Since then they would have to prove me wrong and affirm traditional doctrine on salvation.

Cardinal Nicols supports Amoris Laetitia and pretends it is traditional but he cannot support extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Magisterium of the 16th century. So he has to pretend that the Magisterium did not make an objective mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. He has to pretend that there is no schism with the past popes on EENS.

INVISIBLE NON CATHOLICS ARE VISIBLE EXCEPTIONS TO EENS FOR THE ENGLISH BISHOPS

Fr. Leonard Feeney was saying there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD)and so BOD was not an exception to traditional EENS. The Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Cushing and the cardinals in Rome, like the one today at Westminister, was saying that there  are exceptions.Invisible people have to be visible for the English bishops since they are not permitted to affirm EENS in public.

MAGISTERIUM IS IN HERESY AND THEY CANNOT DENY IT

Now if a school boy at Westminister tells the Archbishop that we cannot see or meet any one saved with the baptism of desire, with or without the baptism of water, he will tell the young man it does not make a difference. Just ignore it.

So the English bishops pretend that I do not exist. They would be irrational and heretical if they contradicted me.So they say nothing in public.They please the Lodge.They do not have what it takes to say that I am correct and the Magisterium is in heresy.
-Lionel Andrades

1.

MAY 1, 2018

Catholic Archdiocese of Liverpool has an anti-Catholic Alder Hey policy on ecumenism etc : they deceive with the approval of the CBCEW which is unethical and possibly illegal http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/the-cathollic-archdiocese-of-liverpool.html