Sunday, May 6, 2018

German Court would find the Knights of Malta and the Catholic bishops of Germany untruthful and telling a lie


Knights of Malta Demand That Chancellor Resign

A German court has found the Grand Chancellor of the Knights of Malta Albrecht Freiherr von Boeselager of being untruthful 1 similarly the German Court would find the Knights of Malta and the Catholic bishops of Germany untruthful and telling a lie - it would be the same with the courts in Britain.2 
They actually tell a lie to change the teachings of the Catholic Church with reference to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)  and Vatican Council II.It's unethical.It's also academic deception at the Catholic Church's universities and schools in Germany.
The courts in Germany must be asked legally  :-
1) Can we humans see people in Heaven in general?
2) Can we see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water and Catholic faith? 
The judge will say "No".
This is a common sense answer.
Then the judge in Hamburg has to be informed that the German bishops and the Knights of Malta say there are exceptions to the traditional exclusivist understanding of salvation and so affirm points 1 and 2 above.
The judge will ask, "Where is the proof?"

HERE IS THE PROOF
1) For them there are exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members with 'faith and baptism' for salvation.Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation ( to avoid Hell). They say no, not all.
2) For them there are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
3) They reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church upon which was based the Old Ecumenism, the Old Ecclesiology, the Old Evangelisation and the Old Theology.
4) Since there is known salvation outside the Church for them, i.e they can see or meet people in the flesh saved without faith and baptism, they have created a New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelisation and New Theology. All this is based upon visible- for- us non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.
5) For them Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) interpreted with this irrational premise is a rupture with the past popes. They have created a schism.
The judge may not make the connection and may again ask, "So where is the proof'". Then it has to be explained to him as follows.

EXPLAINING THE PROOF
1a) Since there are are exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation , they both infer that there are known people saved outside the Church.They personally know such people other wise how could there be exceptions, for example, in 2018 ?
2a) Since they both teach that there are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation) they personally know people saved outside the Church. This is the inference.
They can see or meet people who are now dead and saved in Heaven.So for them there are exceptions exceptions to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, like being saved in invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire, the baptism of blood etc, all theoretical possibilities known only to God.
3a) Since they reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, for them there are personally seen, known and visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church, without 'faith and baptism'.They imply indirectly that a) we humans see people in Heaven in general and b) we  see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water and Catholic faith.
4a) Since there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for the two of them, they have created, upon this irrationality, a new ecumenism, new evangelisation, new ecclesiology and new theology.It is all  based on the irrational premise of their being invisible non Catholics who are saved and personally known.
5a) So they interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) with this irrational premise to create a non traditional conclusion. The innovative conclusion is a rupture with the traditional teachings of the Church.There is a schism with the past popes since the English bishops believe we  1) humans can see people in Heaven in general and that we 2) can we see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water and Catholic faith. 
These five points are the proof. They are not denied by the German  bishops and cardinals or any one in the Knights of Malta.
"But is there any text ?" he may ask.

REFERENCES TO TEXT WITH THE LIE , THE FALSE INFERENCE
Here are references to text where the lie is repeated, the false inference is used to create a liberal and non traditional conclusion, which is a rupture with the past Magisterium of the popes.
1.
In the course of the Council the “subsistit in” took the place of the previous “est”.[7] It contains in nuce the whole ecumenical problem.[8]The “est” claimed that the church of Christ Jesus “is” the Catholic Church. This strict identification of the church of Christ Jesus with the Catholic Church had been represented most recently in the encyclicals Mystici corporis (1943) and Humani generis (1950).[9] But even according to Mystici corporis there are people who, although they have not yet been baptised, are subsumed under the Catholic Church because that is their express desire (DS 3921). Therefore Pius XII had condemned an exclusive interpretation of the axiom “Extra ecclesiam nulla salus” already in 1949.- Cardinal Walter Kaspar, on the website of the Vatican Council for Christian Unity

2.
OCTOBER 21, 2011

Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity claims Pope Pius XII condemned the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus :suggests those in invincible ignorance are explicitly known to us and so contradicts the dogma

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/10/pontifical-council-for-promoting.html

3.
Cardinal Walter Kasper made a stunning statement in the pages of L'Osservatore Romano this past Friday. In offering some reflections on the challenges facing the Church and the continued (perpetual) problem of the "true implementation of Vatican II", Kasper, speaking with reference to the documents of the Council, stated:

"In many places, [the Council Fathers] had to find compromise formulas, in which, often, the positions of the majority are located immediately next to those of the minority, designed to delimit them. Thus, the conciliar texts themselves have a huge potential for conflict, open the door to a selective reception in either direction." (Cardinal Walter Kasper,  L'Osservatore Romano, April 12, 2013)
http://unamsanctamcatholicam.blogspot.it/2013/04/kasper-admits-intentional-ambiguity.html

APRIL 19, 2013

Full of deception  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/04/full-of-deception.html4.OCTOBER 26, 2015Cardinal Kaspar changed ecclesiology assuming B is an exception to A : he used an irrational model to interpret Vatican Council IIhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/cardinal-walter-kasper-said-in.html5.OCTOBER 29, 2015Cardinal Muller has changed doctrine, supports the development of heresy http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/cardinal-muller-has-changed-doctrine.html 

BOTH ARCHBISHOP MULLER AND DI NOIA MADE A FACTUAL ERROR IN THEIR SEPARATE INTERVIEWS WITH THE NATIONAL CATHOLIC REGISTER http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/both-archbishop-muller-and-di-noia-made.html  

6.

Pope Benedict wrongly assumed Robert Kennedy, Richard Cushing  and the Vatican ( Holy Office'49) were objectively correct and Fr.Leonard Feeney made a mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/pope-benedict-assumed-robert-kennedy.html


GERMAN BISHOPS AND CARDINALS TEACHING A LIE
The courts in  Germany can be asked if the German Bishops and Cardinals can teach a falsehood, lie and deception in theology. The courts would not be asked to interpret Catholic theology or docrines but only to confirm if it is possible to physically see and persaonally meet people saved outside the Church, people who would be saved and now are in Heaven. Since this is the inference of the German bishops in their New Theology which states outside the Church there is known salvation.

VIOLATES PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION
Can there really be known salvation outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance or would this only be known to God if it existed?
And if it is only known to God and there are no known cases in the present times for example 2018, then how can there can exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II which states all need faith and baptism for salvation (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II)?
Is this not a violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction even if it supported by the German Pope Benedict and German Cardinal Muller, former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.-Lionel Andrades


1.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12OkVTTm-4dxOf7RE4J6uwib3ZaHjkgfAKp2qJcdSY7Y/edit#
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/knights-of-malta-call-for-chancellor-to-resign

2.
APRIL 30, 2018
Ask the courts which condemned Alfie Evans... http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/ask-courts-which-condemned-alfie-evans.html

MAY 1, 2018
Catholic Archdiocese of Liverpool has an anti-Catholic Alder Hey policy on ecumenism etc : they deceive with the approval of the CBCEW which is unethical and possibly illegal http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/the-cathollic-archdiocese-of-liverpool.html

MAY 3, 2018
On salvation theology it is clear that doctrine has been rejected and changed officially and this is not being denied by the cardinals and yet no one comments on this
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/on-salvation-theology-it-is-clear-that.html

MAY 2, 2018
English bishops are denying Church teaching on salvation in doctrine and practise
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/english-bishops-are-denying-church.html

MAY 2, 2018
English bishops reject doctrine on salvation and pastorally implement the heresy.No denial from them : they will deny that in principle they support euthanasia or giving the Eucharist to the divorced and remarried but not on salvation theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/english-bishops-reject-doctrine-on.html

______________________________

No comments: