Ralph Martin would be interpreting the Catechisms as a rupture with the popes and saints on EENS and this would be official heresy and schism : but not for me with Feeneyism I have a rational , traditional and non heretical choice

NOT OBLIGATORY TO BE A CATHOLIC FOR SALVATION FOR RALPH MARTIN
It's the New Evangelisation for Ralph Martin when he invites people into the Church, knowing they can always leave and accept Jesus in another Christian denomination, since it is not obligatory to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation for him.
Some of them could have left the Church since the Church no more teaches outside the Church there is no salvation like in the past, so the popes  can change doctrine.It is all relative.This is acceptable for Ralph Martin.

This is the new Catholic Church Martin is inviting them into.

Why should they get married in the Catholic Church since the popes teach there is salvation outside the Church.Dogmas and doctrines can be changed they are relative. The popes call it ' a development'.

POSSIBILITIES OF SALVATION IN THE PAST ARE ACTUAL AND KNOWN PEOPLE IN THE PRESENT TIMES FOR HIM

Ralph Martin too considers possibilities of salvation outside the Church as actual people in the present times, in 2018, saved outside the Church.This is irrational and is 'a development'.

So when a Catholic comes back into the Church or attends the RCIA for the first time, he has to believe there is known salvation outside the Church. This was not the teaching of the Catholic Church in the past.

This is the new Catholic Church.

HOW CAN THIS BE THE TEACHING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT FOR HIM ?

How can this be the teaching of the Holy Spirit for Ralph Martin ? Where are the non Catholics in 2018 saved outside the Church? How can this be an excuse to reject the old exclusivist teaching on salvation?

Why must someone coming into the Church accept  the New Ecumenism and not the Old Ecumenism, only because,  Ralph interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture  with Tradition when he has a rational choice?

WHY DOES RALPH MARTIN NOT INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IN HARMONY WITH EENS ?

The new comer could wonder why does Ralph Martin not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict traditional interpretation of EENS? Is this dishonesty? Worldly prudence?

WILL HIS FUTURE BOOKS ALSO BE WRITTEN WITH CUSHINGITE THEOLOGY ?

Even after being informed Ralph Martin interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture  with EENS to protect his reputation ?

He has written books interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and even after being informed about the error he will continue to write books  with this approach ?

CUSHINGISM IS OBLIGATORY AT THE SACRED HEART MAJOR SEMINARY DETROIT

Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi  are obligated to interpret Vatican Council II  with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism as professors of theology as the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, USA.

HOW CAN THE HOLY SPIRIT MAKE AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE ?

When they continue to intepret magisterial documents with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism to create the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition, even after being informed, is this deception? This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake?

But how can Ralph Martin make a turnaround now  ?

A CONSULTOR TO THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR THE NEW EVANGELISATION IS NOT ALLOWED TO USE FEENEYISM

The present two popes use Cushingism and he is a consultor to the Pontifical Council for the New Evangelisation and so he has to do the same.If he starts to interpret Magisterial documents with Feeneyism , there will be trouble for him.

ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT'S NEW EVANGELISATION PROGRAM ALSO DEPENDS ON CUSHINGISM

The Archdiocese of Detroit's New Evangelisation Program also depends upon irrational Cushingism as a philosophy and theology. This is indispensable for creating a rupture with Feeneyite EENS and the old exclusivist ecclesiology which supported the Syllabus of Errors.If he corrected the Archdiocese on theology and doctrine then the Archbishop could take away Ralph's mandatum(licence) to teach theology, which is only given to Cushingites.He could soon be without a job.

TO TEACH THEOLOGY RALPH MARTIN AND ROBERT FASTIGGI MUST MAINTAIN THE DECEPTION

So he and Robert Fastiggi have decided to continue with the deception and so keep their jobs as professors of theology.

However they would be aware that they are in schism with the past popes and saints on EENS.

It was Dr. Fastiggi who told Bishop Donald Sanborn at a debate on Ecclesiology that schism was a terrible thing.

UNDERSTANDING OF NICENE CREED CHANGED

Now they both would also heretically be interpreting the Nicene Creed to mean 'I believe in three or more known baptisms which exclude the baptism of water, they are the baptisms of desire, blood and being saved in invincible ignorance'. For me it is 'I believe in one known baptism of the forgiveness of sins, it is the baptism of water'. I am interpreting the Nicene Creed with Feeneyism.

INVISIBLE PEOPLE ARE VISIBLE FOR THE BOTH OF THEM

They both would also be accepting the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which considered invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc as being visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is not Catholic philosophy and theology. We cannot see or know any one saved with the baptism of desire, since this non Catholic allegedly saved outside the Church would be in Heaven and known only to God. So how can invisible people be exceptions to Feeneyite EENS in the present times ?

RUPTURE WITH THE PAST POPES AND NUMEROUS SAINTS

He would also be interpreting the Catechism of the Catholic Church and other Catechisms as a rupture with St.Thomas Aquinas , St.Francis of Assisi, St.Teresa of Avila and numerous other saints on EENS.Since BOD, BOB and I.I would be known people saved outside the Churc for him. 
But not for me. 
They are not a rupture for me . Since with Feeneyism BOD,BOB and I.I are simply unknown cases, invisible people.

HERESY AND SCHISM IS OBLIGATORY AT DETROIT : NO DENIAL

So with the theology of Cushingism, the new theology, the product is  heresy and schism, which is supported by the two popes and the Left and Ralph Martin , Robert Fastiggi and the rest of the faculty at the seminary in Detroit have to go along with it.

I have mentioned this many times before and have even communicated this to them.They have no denial or correction for me.-Lionel Andrades