When the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM), sedevacantists affirm EENS the Vatican Curia,Catholics Answers and others could not defend themselves theologically

When the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM), sedevacantists in New York affirmed extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and accused the Vatican of being in heresy and  ' a sect'. the Vatican Curia could not defend itself theologically.Theologically the Magisterium of Cardinal Ratzinger was based on Cushingism and this is deception.

The Vatican and the USCCB's Cushingite supporters, Catholics United for the Faith and Catholic Answers, could only say that the the MHFM are sedevacantists and should be avoided. They would say that the Catholic Church has always taught BOD, BOB and I.I  and so they accept it. In other words, there were and are known non Catholics saved outside the Church, with BOD, BOB and I.I who were or are exceptions to EENS.This is Cushingism.

This was their only theological defence and it was based on irrational Cushingism.It is politically correct with the Left.How can there be known non Catholics saved outside the Church? How can speculation and possibilities be actual examples of salvation outside the Church ?

In the following video Jimmy Akins says that the MHFM simply cites 'thing, after thing and after thing' and they are not using sound methodology. He means they are citing the popes ,saints and Church Councils on EENS and are not using Cushingism with reference to EENS.On EENS the MHFM are Feeneyite. Catholic Answers is Cushingite.

Then Jimmy Akins recommends books on sedevacantism which are written by Cushingites Jim Likoudis and Patrick Madrid.The Catholic Cushingites recommend each other.

Youtube : The Problem With the Most Holy Family Monastery Website 

https://youtu.be/PdeOQTW2nkU

But we must also note that the MHFM  interprets BOD, BOB and I.I  with Cushingism too . They also interpret Vatican Council II, like Catholics Answers, with Cushingism, but reject the conclusion.

So if both groups would intepret Vatican Council II and EENS with Feneeyism( invisible non Catholics cannot be visible exceptions to EENS) then there would be no need for the MHFM to go into sedevacantism based on Vatican Council (Cushingite).The Council would be traditional on EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology.

Similarly the sedevacantist Bishop Donald Sanborn said that he wanted to be in union with the popes but Vatican Council II was a break with the past popes on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and ecumenism. This was at the debate on Ecclesiology with Prof. Robert Fastiggi.See the video below. Fastiggi cited invincible ignorance and there being salvation outside the Church.For him there were possibilities of non Catholics being saved outside the Church, implying that these are known people who have been saved outside the Church. This is familiar Cushingism.

It is magisterial and which Fastiggi has to teach at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit,USA.This is the fake theology of Ralph Martin who also teaches at the same seminary, with Cushingism, and whose book Will Many be Saved ? is recommended by the apologists at Catholic Answers.

Ecclesiology Debate: Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi (2004)

https://youtu.be/NigK6MhXs6Q

So why should Catholics, including the sedevacantists accept the new Cushingite reasoning to affirm magisterial documents including Vatican Council II, I asked in a previous blog post, especially since the rational Feeneyite version is there. With Feeneyite Vatican Council II and EENS  we do not have to assume unknown and invisible non Catholics, are personally known and physically visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.

This is the point that Jimmy Akins and EWTN apologists do not discuss.

Similarly in the video below we have Jimmy Akins affirming Feeneyism and Cushingism together. This is the state of the Church today. This is the doctrinal confusion of Pope Benedict.
Jimmy Akins does not outright say that every one needs to enter the Church for salvation and there are no known exceptions.Instead he presents hypothetical cases as being relevant to EENS as exceptions.He has to do this to remain an apologist acceptable to the USCCB.
It is time for all of them to switch to Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology.-Lionel Andrades

Youtube : Is There Salvation Outside the Church? - Jimmy Akin

https://youtu.be/KM0Vav0jUxw?t=2s