All these years conservative and traditionalist Catholics would not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) now they know that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and in harmony with EENS (Feeneyite) and they are keeping quiet about it.

All these years conservative and traditionalist Catholics would not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) now they know that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and in harmony with EENS (Feeneyite) and  they are keeping quiet about it.

Even those who signed the Filial Correction, as if doctrines of the Church were important for them, are not affirming EENS( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).Instead they continue to interpert Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism.

They will continue to interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), the baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, so the Catechism emerges as a rupture with the past exclusive understanding of salvation. There are allegedly known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church, for them. This is irrational and non traditional.

Last week the traditionalists at the Lepanto Foundation held a conference in Rome and ignored this issue.Soon there will be other summer conference and they will avoid talking about this common modernisms among lay and religious leaders, who remain politically correct with the Left.

With Cushingism, BOD, BOB and I.I, are assumed to be known people; known non Catholics saved outside the Church. They are examples of people saved without faith and the baptism of water.So they become objective exceptions to the dogma EENS.

With Feeneyism, BOD, BOB and I.I are assumed to be  unknown people,unknown non Catholics for us human beings, who are saved outside the Church. They are not examples of people saved without faith and the baptism of water.They do not exist in our reality. So they are not practical exceptions to the dogma EENS.

Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism (according to L.A) and the conclusion would be a rupture or continuity with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors).

The traditionalists who organise these conferences continue to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism just as the liberals do. So they remain politically correct and non controversial.

However if they interpreted Vatican Council II with Feeneyism they would be opposed by ecclesiastical Masonry and the political Left outside the Church.

So Catholics support this modernism.Their interpretation of EENS is a schism with the past popes. Their interpretation of Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church.They interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church as a break with the past on salvation. There is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed. 

All this is tolerated by those who signed the Filial Correction, the Dubbia etc.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider inteprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and calls for a Sylabus of Errors on the Council. He will not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), for then the Council would be saying all need faith and baptism for salvation.This would include the non Catholics in his diocese. It would mean the non Catholics in his diocese who have died, are in Hell since the ordinary way of salvation is faith and baptism.They died without it.

BOD, BOB and I.I are not the ordinary means of salvation.

Chris Ferrara and Roberto de Mattei wrote books on Vatican Council II interpeted with Cushingism and now that they know about Vatican Council Feeneyite they are keeping quiet about. They do not admit that they made a mistake on Vatican Council II.

Similarly Michael Voris will not place the text of the dogma EENS on the Church Militant TV website's Frequently Asked Questions page. The FAQ page  criticizes the Most Holy Family Monastery,USA  which affirms EENS Feeneyite and does not hide it.Michael Voris interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and wants the Society of St.Pius X to do the same.Otherwise he will continue to say that the SSPX is in schism, for not affirming a false intepretation of the Council. Michael Voris will also not affirm Vatican Council II Feeneyite and EENS Feeneyite. Yet he criticizes the cardinals and bishops for not affirming the Faith and doing what he also is not ready to do.

It is the same with professors of theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit. They show the  students that Vatican Council II and EENS can be interpreted with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition. This is deception.It is unethical.This is not Magisterial. Since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. Yet this is the lie maintained by Dr. Robert Fastiggi and Prof. Ralph Matin even after they are informed.-Lionel Andrades