Fr.Phillips could ask the secular courts to urge Card. Cupich not to lie to change Church- teachings with a false premise to mislead Catholics

Comment on the blog Vox Cantoris

So if Fr. Frank Phillips wins his case according to Church Canon Law or the secular law, he will go back to his community and parish and interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, as does Cardinal Cupich.

Primer on Feeneyism and Cushingism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/repost-primer-on-feeneyism-and.html

_______________________

Fr.Phillips instead should ask his Canon Lawyer to ask Cardinal Blaise Cupich to interpret all magisterial documents with rational and traditional Feeenyism, instead of the present irrational and innovative Cushingism.He must ask Cardinal Cupich to come back to the Faith on Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS( Feeneyite) and to affirm the Nicene Creed with the traditional theology.

Similarly he could ask the secular courts to urge Cardinal Cupich not to lie and use deception to change Church teachings with a false premise. This is the hallmark of Cushingism. This misleads Catholics in general.

The Cardinal must admit that Vatican Council II does not contradict the 'strict interpretation' of the dogma EENS, unless,one is using a false premise,mixing up what is invisible as being visible, unknown as being known, hypothetical as being concrete and personally known people, in the present times.This is  deception.

-Lionel Andrades

Comment on the blog The Eponymous Flower

The Canons also celebrate Mass in what is now the ordinary form of the Roman Rite, the Mass of Paul VI, in both English and Latin. Their services are known for using traditional, largely Pre-Vatican II, music with both forms of the Mass.-Wikipedia 

So if Fr. Franck Phillips wins his case according to Church Canon Law or the secular law, he will go back to his community and parish and interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, as does Cardinal Cupich.

Then he will interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism and so there will a rupture with the ecclesiology of the old Mass. Cardinal Cupich does the same when he offers Mass in English.

Then Fr. Phillip and his community will affirm the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which assumes invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions to the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.This is how the rest of the Archdiocese interprets BOD, BOB and I.I.

So BOD, BOB and I.I mentioned in all the Catechisms would be a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was interpreted by the Magisterium in the 16th century. This would be a plus point with Cardinal Cupich.A schism with the past popes on EENS.

So the Nicene Creed would be changed and the Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity will have a new understanding theologically.The Oath Against Modernism would have become irrelevant.

So after winning his case Fr. Phillip will go back to all this?! And this where is community is (at) presently and (this) is acceptable for Cardinal Cupich ?!

-Lionel Andrades