A Conference organised by the Lepanto Foundation will be held on June 23 in Rome. It recognizes the problem of the New Theology.It does not however know the precise cause of the New Theology and so how to avoid it in the interpretation of Magisterial documents. They do not know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without this Cushingite theology and then the Council would be in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors and the old ecclesiology of the Church.
Even though some of the Council Fathers, the dominant ones, were using the New Theology, Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the New Theology because of the limitation of the error; the limitation of the New Theology.The inherent limitation is that hypothetical cases can only be interpreted in real life as being hypothetical.There is no choice. Even if the liberals project Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 16 etc, as referring to objective people saved outside the Church, and so create a new false theology,LG 8 will always refer to invisible people in 2018.The liberals can only hope and speculate that someone will be saved outside the Church, without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).They are limited. Since there cannot be practical exceptions, for us human beings, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the old ecclesiology of the Church.
CONFERENCE SPEAKERS APPROVED BY THE POLITICAL LEFT
CONFERENCE SPEAKERS APPROVED BY THE POLITICAL LEFT
May be this is not known to most of the speakers of the conference approved by the political Left.So this meeting is expected to be another of the many conferences ( Catholic Identity, Angelus etc) in which speakers will go around in circles, repeating what they said the previous years.Since they have not put their finger on the precise problem i.e the use of a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition and,the non use of that false premise, to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Tradition.
SPEAKERS CHOOSE TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT
Then even if they know that they can interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors, they would not be politically correct with Left and the Vatican.This is a practical problem for them.
If they wanted,they could eliminate the premise and change the Church, bringing it back on its traditional theological rails.But the politically safe speakers will only be repeating themselves and telling us what we already know.
SPEAKERS CHOOSE TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT
Then even if they know that they can interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors, they would not be politically correct with Left and the Vatican.This is a practical problem for them.
If they wanted,they could eliminate the premise and change the Church, bringing it back on its traditional theological rails.But the politically safe speakers will only be repeating themselves and telling us what we already know.
THEY WILL NOT AFFIRM THE SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING IN HARMONY WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS ( FEENEYITE)
It would be something, if they said in public that they affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation in harmony with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite-without the premise), EENS( Feeneyite-without the premise) and the Catechisms, interpreted with invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).
The Creed interpreted without Cushingism, so hypothetical cases are not hypothetical and there are not three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins which exclude the baptism of water and the Holy Spirit does not teach the Church to proclaim irrationality and innovation. So without the error, they would saying that there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church, before and after Vatican Council II for them.
THEY WILL NOT AFFIRM TRADITIONAL MISSION IN PUBLIC
There is traditional Mission knowing that most people die outside the Church and so are oriented to Hell.All non Catholics who have died with no known exceptions are in Hell. Since the ordinary means of salvation is 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) and not BOD, BOB and I.I or LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc.
THEY WILL NOT SAY THAT THE NEW ECUMENISM , NEW EVANGELISATION ETC IS BASED ON A THEOLOGICAL ERROR
The Creed interpreted without Cushingism, so hypothetical cases are not hypothetical and there are not three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins which exclude the baptism of water and the Holy Spirit does not teach the Church to proclaim irrationality and innovation. So without the error, they would saying that there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church, before and after Vatican Council II for them.
THEY WILL NOT AFFIRM TRADITIONAL MISSION IN PUBLIC
There is traditional Mission knowing that most people die outside the Church and so are oriented to Hell.All non Catholics who have died with no known exceptions are in Hell. Since the ordinary means of salvation is 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) and not BOD, BOB and I.I or LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc.
THEY WILL NOT SAY THAT THE NEW ECUMENISM , NEW EVANGELISATION ETC IS BASED ON A THEOLOGICAL ERROR
This would be something.They would be saying in public that there is no known salvation outside the Church, something obvious and so they would have to reject the New Theology.Since it is based on known salvation outside the Church,it's foundation is visible and objective cases of non Catholics saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.They would have to reject the New Ecumenism created upon an irrationality.
The New Ecclesiology, New Canon Law and New Evangelisation based on Cushingite theology would be meaningless and obsolete.They would have to reject the Balamand Declaration which uses the same false premise.
The New Ecclesiology, New Canon Law and New Evangelisation based on Cushingite theology would be meaningless and obsolete.They would have to reject the Balamand Declaration which uses the same false premise.
Can they say all this?
No.
They have to protect their reputation,lifestyle etc. This is how they think.These are their values and priorities.
PRUDENT SPEAKERS
So the conference will be another enjoyable meeting among friends.It was made possible since the organizers received the donations to hold this non-committal and prudent meeting.
The speakers will include Abbé Claude Barthe, Prof. Roberto de Mattei,Prof. Valerio Gigliotti, Dr. Maria Guarini, Fr. Albert Kallio O.P.,Dr. John Lamont, Prof. Enrico Maria Radaelli,Prof. don Alberto Strumia, Prof. Giovanni Turco, Dr. José Antonio Ureta and Dr.Joseph Shaw.The title fo the conference is Old and new Modernism: the roots of the Church’s crisis-Lionel Andrades
Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal Raymond Burke since he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors,an ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ the King : traditionalists at conf. next month support the New Theology
PRUDENT SPEAKERS
So the conference will be another enjoyable meeting among friends.It was made possible since the organizers received the donations to hold this non-committal and prudent meeting.
The speakers will include Abbé Claude Barthe, Prof. Roberto de Mattei,Prof. Valerio Gigliotti, Dr. Maria Guarini, Fr. Albert Kallio O.P.,Dr. John Lamont, Prof. Enrico Maria Radaelli,Prof. don Alberto Strumia, Prof. Giovanni Turco, Dr. José Antonio Ureta and Dr.Joseph Shaw.The title fo the conference is Old and new Modernism: the roots of the Church’s crisis-Lionel Andrades
MAY 27, 2018
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment