He does not want to say like Cardinal Raymond Burke that other religions are false paths to salvation or like Cardinal Angelo Amato he does not want to call for Mission based on Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14)
From Hilary White's blog https://whatisupwiththesynod.com/index.php/2018/06/26/the-purge-continues-the-contemplative-religious-are-next/ Bishop Gracida has posted my latest for the Remnant.
At a meeting of religious formators in April 2015 in Rome, Carballo said quite clearly that it is Vatican II that must take precedence over the classical charisms of religious life. “With this explicit reference to the Second Vatican Council, we point to our profound conviction that the council is the point of reference, non-negotiable, in the formation to the consecrated life.”
Lionel: Exactly and he means Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and not Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) could be rejected by the Left. So after all is said and done Vatican Council II may not really be the point of reference, the non negitiable.I do not think it is. The point of reference for him is only Vatican Council II (Cushingite) which all good Catholics must reject.
In his speech in Avila, Spain a month later, Carballo spoke even more plainly, denouncing the “many fundamentalist groups” in the religious life, saying, “This is not of the Spirit.” “Vatican II is our compass” he said, adding that the pope “takes his lead from Vatican II.”
Lionel: Correct. He is referring to those Catholics who intepret Vatican Council II with Cushingism,which is a rupture with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the past popes and saints. So now they reject Vatican Council II(Cushingite) and do not know about Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).Hilary White, Michael Matt and the established traditionalists will not tell them for fear of losing their personal privileges. _____________________
Carballo said that with the collapse of vocations over the last 50 years, it is clear that the forms of religious life that have been known through the last 20 centuries have “done their task in the Church.”
Lionel: The collapse of vocations is due to Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and the rejection of EENS ( Feeneyite) by the politically correct with the Left, traditionalists.
This, he said is a time of “purification” for the religious life. He called “some forms” of religious life “antiquated” and claimed that they “say hardly anything to people.
Lionel : Like the present two popes and the Vatican cardinals he does not want to say like Cardinal Raymond Burke that other religions are false paths to salvation.
Like Cardinal Angelo Amato he does not want to call for Mission based on Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14).
All the religious are interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism and no one is telling them about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).-Lionel Andrades https://whatisupwiththesynod.com/index.php/2018/06/26/the-purge-continues-the-contemplative-religious-are-next/
JUNE 26, 2018
SSPX begin negotiations with Abp. Guido Pozzo : ask if Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the Lionel Andrades model
I affirm baptism of desire(BOD) Feeneyite and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) Feeneyite.I do not reject BOD,baptism of blood (BOB)and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) which are always Feeneyite for me
I am referring to Feeneyism and Cushingism as explained on my blog.The fault does not lie with Vatican Council II in itself. It depends upon how you interpret the Council, whether you use Cushingism or Feeneyism. Cushingism results in the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition
I affirm baptism of desire(BOD) Feeneyite and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) Feeneyite.I do not reject BOD,baptism of blood (BOB)and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) which are always Feeneyite for mehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/repost-i-affirm-baptism-of-desirebod.html