Prof. Roberto dei Mattei an organiser of today's Lepanto Foundation conference which is critical of modernism in the Catholic Church does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite) in public. This is modernism.
He may expediently say that the Church 'condemned' Fr. Leonard Feeney for holding the strict interpretation of EENS and so he cannot affirm EENS like him.But the Church has also accepted Vatican Council II so why does he criticize the Council ? Why does he say that Pope Francis is teaching heresy ? He could keep quiet about this too. Why does he have a problem with Amoris Laetitia ? This is what 'the Church' teaches.
He interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism which assumes unknown non Catholics, are known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.So every one does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church in the present times. This is the Cushingite reasoning of the SSPX bishops too.
The present two popes would also know that their interpretation of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and EENS ( Cushingite) is modenism, it is an innovation in the Church but they do not want to displease the Jewish Left.They follow the instructions of the Masons,to say above water.
Similarly for political and worldly reasons Roberto dei Mattei and Dr.Joseph Shaw are not affirming EENS and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and instead they are choosing the modernist interpretation of the Council.
I interpret EENS with invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance not being visible exceptions to EENS. He does not do this and says the opposite.
I do not reject BOD,BOB and I.I but just affirm them as hypothetical cases. They cannot be anything else in practical life.He does not do the same.For him BOD,BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS and so they are not just hypothetical. They are real people for him,saved outside the Church.They are practical exceptions. This is the common modernism in the Church. It is also approved by the enemies of the Church.
I affirm Vatican Council II (Lumen Gentium 8).For me LG 8 is only a hypothetical case.It is not an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite). For him Vatican Council II (LG 8) contradicts EENS (Feeneyite). This is modernism.For me he is a modernist. For him this could only be a politically necessary position.
Similarly he has a new politically correct interpretation of the Nicene Creed and unlike me interprets the Catechism of Trent as a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. Since BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known non Catholics for him, saved outside the Church. For me there are no such known people.
Similarly the Catechism of Pope Pius X is a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church and also with EENS (Feeneyite) for him.Since as a Cushingite BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church for him.
How can the Catechisms of the Council of Trent and Pius X be a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church over the centuries ?
It has to be rupture since he assumes BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church, they are examples of outside the Church there being known salvation.
This is not just doctrinal confusion but a doctrinal mess this is pure and public modernism year in and year out. He and the other traditionalists don't do anything about it. They do not even address the issue since they do not want to say that all non Catholics in 2018 are on the way to Hell since they die without 'faith and baptism'.
Also there is nothing mentioned in Vatican Council II to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA2, UR 3, GS 22 etc refer to only hypothetical cases. They are speculative possibiliies mentioned in Vatican Council II because of the confusion in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Also there is nothing mentioned in Vatican Council II to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA2, UR 3, GS 22 etc refer to only hypothetical cases. They are speculative possibiliies mentioned in Vatican Council II because of the confusion in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
There are so many reports on this issue on my blog but modernist Roberto dei Mattei is not going to respond since he cannot affirm Catholic truth being a rich and prudent man.
It is like Bishop Athanasiuis Schneider calling for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II. When I ask him if this Syllabus would say that all non Catholics need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7) and there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II, he will not respond. He will not announce that all the Kazkh people in his diocese need to convert into the Catholic Church with faith and baptism to avoid the fires of Hell and this is the Conciliar teaching.He too is comfortable and a man with a good reputation.-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 23, 2018
Problem of LifeSiteNews' Catholic editors and correspondents interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrational premise. This is modernism today
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/problem-of-lifesitenews-catholic.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment