(Time 1:12.43) He is asked if the Feeneyites are reconciled with the Church?
They are reconciled with the Church since their Cushingite bishops in Worcester and Manchester expect them to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.The St.Benedict Centers have not announced that they affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
Their Cushingite bishops also reject EENS( Feeneyite) and interpret the Catechisms with Cushingism, like Dr.Fastiggi.
____________________
Dr.Fastiggi says that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is "exquisite".The Letter assumes unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are known and visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so EENS as it was traditionally known over the centuries was contradicted.This is the Cushingite new theology being taught by Dr. Robert Fastiggi.This is irrational. To assume unknown people are known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS is a false reasoning.Yet it is supported by Dr. Fastiggi.
__________________
(Time 5:24) He cites Lumen Gentium 14 as if it refers to known people saved outside the Church and does not clarify that Lumen Gentium 14 does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.
He cannot say this. Since LG 14 really does contradict Feeneyite EENS for him.He is a Cushingite.His reasoning is Cushingite. LG 14 refers to unknown people for him while for me they are simply hypothetical cases.
The Council Fathers, at least some of them were Cushingites and so they made this mistake at LG 14. This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
However even though LG 14 is a mistake we can be aware that there are no known people in 2018, for example, saved outside the Catholic Church in invincible ignorance.So we can interpret LG 14 as being Feeneyite, as not being an exception to EENS as it was known for example to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
(8:34) He says Vatican Council II goes back to the theology of St. Robert Bellarmine. We are united by the same faith...
Yes this is a Feeneyite passage in Vatican Council II (LG 14). There are also Cushingite passages which contradict this Feeneyite passage. Dr. Fastiggi does not speak about this.
(12:24) He cites Lumen Gentium 16 which says there are some people who do not God but strive to live a good life.So there elements of truth and holiness in other religions.It is not that you are either in or out, says Dr.Fastiggi.Why not? Whom do we know who is not in the Church and is 'in', who will be saved? He is Cushingite so he will assume unknown people, whom only Jesus can judge, will be judged by us human beings as going to Heaven, even though they are not in the Church with faith and baptism(AG 7).He can judge the exceptions, of course. Since he is a Cushingite.
(16:52) He presents Jesus without the Church, it is Christology without the past exlusivist ecclesiology.He is a liberal.
(18:26) "What about those who are not members of the Church, are they lost ?", he asks. He then cites invincible ignorance(LG 16) as an exception. In other words there are known people saved in invincible ignorance outside the Church and so there are exceptions to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past. This is his familiar Cushingite reason.
(19:40) Now historically he tries to justify his Cushingite reasons and says in the Patristic period there was a thinking of the possibilitiy of non Catholics being saved outside the Church.
(34:25) He cites Feeneyite Cantate Domino, Council of Florence but has negated it earlier with his Cushingite interpretation of LG 14, LG 16 etc.
-Lionel Andrades
__________________
(Time 5:24) He cites Lumen Gentium 14 as if it refers to known people saved outside the Church and does not clarify that Lumen Gentium 14 does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.
He cannot say this. Since LG 14 really does contradict Feeneyite EENS for him.He is a Cushingite.His reasoning is Cushingite. LG 14 refers to unknown people for him while for me they are simply hypothetical cases.
The Council Fathers, at least some of them were Cushingites and so they made this mistake at LG 14. This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
However even though LG 14 is a mistake we can be aware that there are no known people in 2018, for example, saved outside the Catholic Church in invincible ignorance.So we can interpret LG 14 as being Feeneyite, as not being an exception to EENS as it was known for example to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
(8:34) He says Vatican Council II goes back to the theology of St. Robert Bellarmine. We are united by the same faith...
Yes this is a Feeneyite passage in Vatican Council II (LG 14). There are also Cushingite passages which contradict this Feeneyite passage. Dr. Fastiggi does not speak about this.
(12:24) He cites Lumen Gentium 16 which says there are some people who do not God but strive to live a good life.So there elements of truth and holiness in other religions.It is not that you are either in or out, says Dr.Fastiggi.Why not? Whom do we know who is not in the Church and is 'in', who will be saved? He is Cushingite so he will assume unknown people, whom only Jesus can judge, will be judged by us human beings as going to Heaven, even though they are not in the Church with faith and baptism(AG 7).He can judge the exceptions, of course. Since he is a Cushingite.
(16:52) He presents Jesus without the Church, it is Christology without the past exlusivist ecclesiology.He is a liberal.
(18:26) "What about those who are not members of the Church, are they lost ?", he asks. He then cites invincible ignorance(LG 16) as an exception. In other words there are known people saved in invincible ignorance outside the Church and so there are exceptions to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past. This is his familiar Cushingite reason.
(19:40) Now historically he tries to justify his Cushingite reasons and says in the Patristic period there was a thinking of the possibilitiy of non Catholics being saved outside the Church.
(34:25) He cites Feeneyite Cantate Domino, Council of Florence but has negated it earlier with his Cushingite interpretation of LG 14, LG 16 etc.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment