Repost : If you speak to Cardinal Robert Sarah he will say that he rejects Feeneyism. So he interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.
JUNE 3, 2015
If you speak to Cardinal Robert Sarah he will say that he rejects Feeneyism. So he interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.
Odds are that Cardinal Robert Sarah, like Pope Francis and Pope Benedict ,does not accept the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which says every one needs the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation. So the Traditional Latin Mass is not being allowed for the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, one of the reasons, is that they accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( even though with confusion). They are considered crypto Lefebvrists since they affirm that all non Catholics need to convert into the Church for salvation.This would include Jews. Since the FSSP in general does not affirm the rigorist interpretation of the dogma they are allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass.They have accepted the new ecclesiology with the litturgy. They interpret Vatican Council II with (A) being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) , seeds of the Word (AG 11), elements of sanctification and truth(LG 8), imperfect communion with the Church (NA ) and a ray of that Truth(NA 2) CONTRADICTING (B) the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Feeneyite version.They have acceped the Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani model. If you speak to Cardinal Sarah he will say that he rejects Feeneyism. This is expected of him by the Jewish Left. I learnt this in communication with Cardinal Francis Arinze at the Vatican. So he interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism , which infers that there are apparitions in 2015 of persons saved in (A).There would have to be real apparitions for them to be exceptions to the dogma. This is heretical and not real for Cardinal Sarah.Yet this is the reality at the Vatican.If he says A is not an exception to B, since A is known only to God and is hypothetical for us, then it would mean there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict B (the dogma). Yet we cannot expect Cardinal Sarah to be corrected since even the traditionalists make the same mistake. Even for the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, A contradicts B. So for them Vatican Council II is not in harmony with the rigorist interpretation of the dogma ,according to Fr.Leonard Feeney. Liberals and traditionalists are doing catechesis and theology with the same objective error. -Lionel Andrades