Michael Davis, Romano Amerio, Dietrich vob Hildebrand and other traditionalists have interpreted Vatican Council II using the false premise of the dead- saved being visible. They were not aware of this premise. Similarly millions of people have interpreted the Council using this false premise. Hence we have all the confusion today which is correctly reported by Davis, Amerio and Hildrebrand.
If we do not use the dead man walking premise Vatican Council IIis traditional.
Daphne Mcleod once in correspondence with me was critical of Fr.Leonard Feeney. She remembered the controversy in Boston.She was a young lady.
Daphne also assumed that the baptism of desire was explict for us and so an exception to the tradtional interpretation of the priest from Boston.So it is possible that Daphne's mentor Michael Davis also held this error.