Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Bishop Donald Sanborn will continue to interpret Vatican Council II (Cushingite) as a rupture with Tradition since this is politically correct with the Left. If both these sedevacantist bishops supported Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) there would be no rupture with Tradition and they would be in harmony with the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite).But then they will be persecuted by the Jewish Left.
Now they can live in peace with their traditional religious communities, open new seminaries and religious houses.They are not labelled as a hate group.
By choosing doctrial confusion with the use of a false theology, they can interpret Vatican Council II as a rejection with Tradition and then reject the Council.
This is also the practical reality for the traditionalists who talk about doctrine.Amoris Laetitia and abortion can be discussed.But Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) would result in a threat to their good reputation with the liberals and the Left.
So Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Bishop Donald Sanborn will continue to interpret the Catechisms of Pius X and Trent as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS and in this way please the liberals.
They will continue to interpret Vatican Council II Cushingite , as a rupture with the past ecclesiology since it is prudent. They will not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).In this way, like it is for the Society of the St.Pius X, they are they are allowed to open new churches , seminaries and religious houses.
They do not want to admit that their sedevacantism based on a Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS is now obsolete.-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 26, 2018
Similar to Latinist Ryan Grant, the sedevacantists Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Bishop Donald Sanborn interpret the Catechism of the Council of Trent and Pope Pius X as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology