So is the Lepanto Foundation using irrational Cushingism or traditional Feeneyism at the June 23 conference to interpret magisterial documents? We know the answer. Traditionalists are Cushingites on Vatican Council II.

The speakers at the Lepanto Foundation conference on June 23 must know that Cardinal Raymond Burke and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j interpret Vatican Council II, Lumen Gentium 8, differently.
The two popes and I interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) differently.
Bishop Bernard Fellay interprets LG 16,UR 3 etc with a mistake.

Cardinal Gerhard Muller and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia have interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise and so there is a rupture with the dogma EENS.
The traditionalists St. Benedict Center and the Society of St. Pius X intepret EENS differently. 
They both interpret Vatican Council II like Cardinals Koch, Kasper and Marx.

The Polish bishops who have consecrated their country to Christ the King reject EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century who affirmed the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.

The Franciscans of the Immaculate interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition and are not being told that there is a rational and traditional choice.Since the alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II is being rejected by the political Left and the Vatican.

So what is the solution?
Someone has to explain the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism according to L.A. Then he or she has to explain how the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism.

Then it has to be explained how all the Catechisms when they refer to BOD, BOB and I.I can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism.

It is important then to see how EENS can be interpreted traditionally with Feeneyism or innovatively with Cushingism.

Then we come to Vatican Council II and see that with Feeneyism or Cushingism we get two different interpretations, two different conclusions. One is a rupture and the other a continuity with Tradition.

So by now it would be clear that Church documents can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism and the conclusion is different.

Cushingism for me is the New Theology.Whoever is speaking on the New Theology at the June 23 conference must discuss this point.

When did this Cushingite theology originate in the Catholic Church? It came in a big way with The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston, Richard Cushing, relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney (1949). 

LOHO  is Cushingite and was accepted at Vatican Council II. Lumen Gentium 14 is Cushingite.With Cushingite reasoning the Council Fathers mentioned LG 8, UR 3, LG 16 etc. Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits were active at Vatican Council II. They also refused to lift the excommunication of some 19 years,on Fr. Leonard Feeney.During Vatican Council II he was still excommunicated for saying nothing new .He refused to accept Cushingite BOD, BOB and I.I and  was expelled from the Jesuit community who had switched to Cushingism.

The liberal theologians then re-interpreted Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura,the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X with Cushingism.So there had to be a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite) as it was known to the popes and saints over the centuries.

Redemptoris Missio was Cushingite and Dominus Iesus  was written by Cushingite Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.Two papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican accepted the LOHO false reasoning.So there was a schism with the past popes and the old ecclesiology of the saints and founders of religious communities( St.Francis, St. Dominic etc).

So today Cushingism is the widespread heresy in the Church, like Arianism was in the past.

So is the Lepanto Foundation using irrational Cushingism or traditional Feeneyism at the June 23 conference to interpret magisterial documents? We know the answer. Traditionalists are Cushingites on Vatican Council II.

-Lionel Andrades

JUNE 9, 2018

Speakers at the Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome on June 23 do not know that there is a mistake in Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II.They should be discussing it

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-speakers-at-lepanto-foundation.html

JUNE 9, 2018

Lepanto Foundation conference this month in Rome is expected to be another non committal, prudent meeting among friends : the real problem and its solution is too sensitive for them to discuss and proclaim

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/lepanto-foundation-conference-his-month.html

MAY 27, 2018

Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal Raymond Burke since he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors,an ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ the King : traditionalists at conf. next month support the New Theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/liberals-cannot-accuse-cardinal-raymond.html