Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Repost : SSPX two groups divided on doctrine

JUNE 8, 2015

SSPX two groups divided on doctrine

The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) priests are interpretating Vatican Council II with Marchetti's irrationality instead of traditional Feeneyism and  this will be welcomed by the Vatican. They are expected to be granted full canonical status in the future since they assume that cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to salvation without Catholic Faith and the baptism of water.
More so, that these cases in Heaven refer to objective cases, seen in the flesh on earth. This was how Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre also understood it.
 They are expected to be given canonical status since like the Vatican they accept Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignornance)  and Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth) etc as referring to seen in the flesh cases today.Presently the SSPX rejects LG 16, LG 8 etc as being exceptions to the rigorist intepretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Feeneyite version. But in future, for canonical status, they will have to overlook this..
According to reports Bishop Bernard Fellay , the superior general of the SSPX is being recognised in a new way by the Vatican.
He will have to gloss over the fact that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican considers Vatican Council II's Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3,Nostra Aetate 2 etc  according to Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani 's model ( as do one group of the SSPX).So they reject the Feeneyite version of the dogma.
Here there is confusion among the SSPX priests.There are two groups.This can be seen in their writings and publications.The SSPX Angelus Press in the USA has published a book by Fr.Francois Laisney 'Is Feeneyism Catholic ?' which is appreciated by the Vatican and the Jewish Left.It draws on Marchetiism.While the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012  says there are no exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is Feeneyite and contradicts the SSPX (USA).
 The CDF has chosen the SSPX (USA) position.So in future Bishop Fellay will have to accept the CDF position of Vatican Council II being a break with Tradition and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, since the Vatican interprets the Council with Marchetiism.
How will Bishop Bernard Fellay and the SSPX priests respond in the future?
 These are the two groups in the SSPX expressed by these two pictures.
Interestingly, Bishop Richard Williamson of the SSPX Resistance is also, knowing or unknowingly, in the Marchetti camp.
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: