The Canon Lawyer Marc Balestrieri does not consider the rejection of Tradition with the use of an irrational premise by Pope Benedict as 'an attenuating factor' for the SSPX to reject Vatican Council II(Cushingite) or for couples to choose the SSPX chapel to get married.1
When Pope Benedict says unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are known exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), this is irrational and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.He has changed the traditional understanding of EENS with this irrationality( invisible people are visible for him).This is an attenuating circumstance.Young Catholics are not obliged to get married where priests who offer Mass in the vernacular reject Tradition, with the use of the same false premise.
When Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j interpret Lumen Gentium 8 as referring to known people saved outside the Church, even when there are no such known people, then this becomes a heretical interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS.This is heresy. It is schism with the past popes. So this is also an attenuating circumstance for the SSPX to reject Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).
Similarly in March 2016(Avvenire) Pope Benedict could have interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.Instead he chose Cushingism as a philosophy and theology to create a rupture with EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. This was possible since he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so there was a break with the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite).This could be an attenuating factor for Catholics choosing the SSPX chapel to receive the Sacraments.
Then in 2012 the SSPX General Chapter Statement affirmed EENS ( Feeneyite) indicating Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) was for them not an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite). This was acceptable for Ecclesia Dei and Pope Benedict.So in 2012 the SSPX was following rational and traditional Catholic doctrine and theology and it was rejected by the Vatican. This is another attenuating factor in favour of the SSPX.
Also the SSPX-Vatican Doctrinal talks were conducted by Pope Benedict with both sides having to interpret Vatican Council II, EENS and the Catechisms with Cushingite reasoning, which is irrational.If they had interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I with Feeneyism, doctrines would have changed. They would have become traditional.
So there could be Catholics who choose not get married by priests who support Pope Benedict and their marriage should not be considered invalid.These are attenuating circumstances and a couple could choose the SSPX chapel to receive the Sacraments.-Lionel Andrades
Similarly in March 2016(Avvenire) Pope Benedict could have interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.Instead he chose Cushingism as a philosophy and theology to create a rupture with EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. This was possible since he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so there was a break with the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite).This could be an attenuating factor for Catholics choosing the SSPX chapel to receive the Sacraments.
Then in 2012 the SSPX General Chapter Statement affirmed EENS ( Feeneyite) indicating Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) was for them not an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite). This was acceptable for Ecclesia Dei and Pope Benedict.So in 2012 the SSPX was following rational and traditional Catholic doctrine and theology and it was rejected by the Vatican. This is another attenuating factor in favour of the SSPX.
Also the SSPX-Vatican Doctrinal talks were conducted by Pope Benedict with both sides having to interpret Vatican Council II, EENS and the Catechisms with Cushingite reasoning, which is irrational.If they had interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I with Feeneyism, doctrines would have changed. They would have become traditional.
So there could be Catholics who choose not get married by priests who support Pope Benedict and their marriage should not be considered invalid.These are attenuating circumstances and a couple could choose the SSPX chapel to receive the Sacraments.-Lionel Andrades
1
JUNE 1, 2018
Canon Lawyer Marc Balestrieri does not see how avoiding official heresy and schism is an attenuating factor for the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/canon-lawyer-marc-balestrieri-does-not.html
MAY 30, 2018
Who really is in schism?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/who-really-is-in-schism.html
MESSAGE INCOMPLETE
MESSAGE INCOMPLETE
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment