Repost : For the St.Benedict Centers Mohammad and all Muslims are not in Hell.

DECEMBER 23, 2017

For the St.Benedict Centers Mohammad and all Muslims are not in Hell.

    

All these years the St.Benedict Centers, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary have been discussing if the baptism of desire results in justification or salvation when there are no physically visible and known baptism of desire cases in our reality.

Then they have been discussing if the baptism of desire(BOD) is followed with the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation, when the baptism of desire is not an issue, it does not exist in our reality, and if it happened it would only be known to God.It has no connection with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

They have been rejecting Vatican Council II, in other words  Lumen Gentium 14( case of the catechumen) and Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance) were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. So there were known cases of LG 16 and LG 14 for them, for there to be exceptions to the old exclusivist theology on salvation.But there are no such cases.Yet they have been projecting Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite).

 This is bad theology and bad philosophy. It is something they have in common with the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) and other traditionalists.

So it is not enough to go for the Tridentine Rite Mass. One has to affirm the traditional theology and doctrines of the Catholic Church, which accompany the old Latin Mass.

Now the St. Benedict Center, Still River,MA,has approved the interpretation of Vatican Council II in the diocese of Worcester, without affirming Vatican Council II (Feeneyite),in which LG 14 and LG 16 are referring to invisible people in our reality.They can only be hypothetical cases it needed to be announced.

But this would be controversial for them.So the understanding is that is is O.K for the bishops in Worcester and Manchester,USA  to affirm Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition, and a break with the ecclesiology of the old Latin Mass.

If they affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite), the rational interpretation,then they would be saying Mohammad and all Muslims are oriented to Hell without faith and baptism(AG 7, LG 14) and LG 14 and LG 16 are not exceptions.With Cushingite Vatican Council II there are exceptions.

So they do not affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) and please bishops.They  are then accepted as Priors in Church-recognized communities. They have compromised.

They are Cushingites. Unlike me.

At the Latin Mass they interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

There are no clarifications or announcements made by them since they want to be politically correct with the Left.

They will oppose abortion but support Vatican Council II(Cushingite), they will oppose euthanasia and homosexuality but allow their bishops to affirm EENS(Cushingite) and Vatican Council II(Cushingite).

When they refer to EENS( Feeneyite) there are no exceptions of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).However in Vatican Council II, for them, BOD, BOB and I.I become exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is contradictory.

It is the result of their bad philosophy and accepting the new theology based on invisible and hypothetical cases being non visible and real exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

-Lionel Andrades