Repost :Fr. Leonard Feeney, Brother Francis Malus and Sister Catherine Goddard Clarke did not know about Vatican Council II Feeneyite, the Council interpreted without the false premise ?
JULY 29, 2018
Fr. Leonard Feeney, Brother Francis Malus and Sister Catherine Goddard Clarke did not know about Vatican Council II Feeneyite, the Council interpreted without the false premise ?
On the home page of the website Catholicism.org of the St.Benedict Center, Richmond N.H is a banner :
This book interprets Vatican Council II withCushingism and creates a rupture with the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it is interpreted by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center(SBC), the community of Fr. Leonard Feeney.
Prof. Roberto dei Mattei, the writer of the book was not aware of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and how it would not contradict the dogma EENS as it is interpreted by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
But even the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary did not know this.
They have been interpreting Vatican Council II only with Cushingism and their position on the Council is confusing.
They condone the Council as it is interpreted by their bishops without asking the bishops and their Curia to interpret the Council with Feeneyism.This would be a rational interpretation and there would not be a rupture with the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology of the Church.
Even now after being informed, both the communities of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, in the dioceses of Worcester and Manchester USA , will not have an article on Vatican Council II Feeneyite. While they continue to support Vatican Council II(Cushingite) which is a break with the dogma EENS as it was known to the founders of their community, Fr. Leonard Feeney, Brother Francis Malus and Sister Catherine Goddard Clarke.
Did the three of them not know about Vatican Council II Feeneyite ? They did not know that the Council could have been interpreted without the false premise?
When the bishops of their diocese, interpret Vatican Council II like Roberto dei Mattei , they are saying that they know only of EENS (Cushingite).
In EENS ( Cushingite), the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to only visible and known people saved outside the Church. This is irrational and contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction.
The St.Benedict Center, Still River was recently granted canonical status by the bishop of Worcester and Ecclesia Dei since they did not affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism. If they did interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism then the Council would be in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite) and this is unacceptable to the Left and the Vatican.-Lionel Andrades
JULY 29, 2018
Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism has changed dogmatic teaching in the Church : Michael J. Miller and Roberto dei Mattei have made a mistake