Repost : Since for Ludwig Ott there are exceptions to EENS,the old Catechisms would also be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology.It would contradict an ecumenism of return and no salvation outside the Church
Since for Ludwig Ott the baptism of desire(BOD) , baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS,the Catechisms of Trent, Baltimore and Pius X would also be a rupture with the past ecclesiology on ecumenism and outside the Church no salvation etc.Since when they refer to BOD, BOB and I.I, they would be interpreted as referring not to invisible cases but known people saved outside the Catholic Church. CATECHISMS AND VATICAN COUNCIL II A RUPTURE WITH THE PAST FOR SCHNEIDER AND FASTIGGI
It is the same with Bishop Athansius Schneider and Dr.Robert Fastiggi.Not only would the Catechisms be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology because of the false premise but even Vatican Council II has to be a rupture with the past.This would be normal for Cushingites.
So they interpret LG 8 etc as being a visible example of salvation outside the Church.Vatican Council II is interpreted as a rupture with the past ecclesiology.So there are new doctrines in the Church on salvation. BISHOP SCHNEIDER AND PROF. ROBERT FASTIGGI ARE CUSHINGITES AND LUDWIG OTT IS NOT A FEENEYITE Last month it was announced that Baronius Press released a new edition of Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma. Although based on the original translation by Dr. Patrick Lynch it has been "fully revised and updated" by Dr. Robert Fastiggi. The Foreword was written by Bishop Athanasius Schneider. BOD, BOB AND I.I WOULD ALSO CONTRADICT THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS FOR SANBORN AND PIVARUNAS
Similarly for the sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas, BOD,BOB and I.I are a rupture with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So BOD, BOB and I.I would also contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on ecumenism.The old ecumenism of return would have practical exceptions.
The sedevacantist bishops may criticize Fr.Leonard Feeny on EENS and will not affirm 'the strict interpretation' of EENS, like the Jesuits in the Middle Ages, but they still use the same faulty reasoning to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.So the Council is a rupture with EENS(Feeneyite) for them.But without Cushingism as a philosophy and theology the Council supports Fr. Leonard Feeney. VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS FR. LEONARD FEENEY
Without the irrational premise, without Cushingite theology; the New Theology, Vatican Council II supports Fr. Leonard Feeney.
Also the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) interpreted with Feeneyism would be in harmony with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite), EENS( Feeneyite), the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite) etc. TRADITIONAL MISSION There would be mission/evangelisation, knowing that all non Catholics in 2018 are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism.There are no known exceptions. It would also mean that all who have died as non Catholics are in Hell without faith and baptism and there are no known exceptions for us human beings. Faith and the baptism of water is the norm, the ordinary means of salvation. CHURCH TELLS US THAT ALL NON CATHOLICS ARE IN HELL So the Church tells us that all non Catholics are in Hell (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, the Council of Florence etc on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Catechism of the Catholic Church(845,846,1257 etc).
Bishop Schneider and Dr.Robert Fastiggi are not willing to affirm this in public.They are comfortable with Vatican Council II (Cushingite)-Lionel Andrades