eucharistandmission: Mass offered by the Dominican priest Fr.Thomas Crean at the TMC chapel may be valid but it is in scandal. There is an impediment which is not denied by the TMC faculty.

Monday, December 10, 2018

Mass offered by the Dominican priest Fr.Thomas Crean at the TMC chapel may be valid but it is in scandal. There is an impediment which is not denied by the TMC faculty.

Fr.Thomas Crean op is on the faculty of the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts(TMC) and was a speaker at the Rome Life Forum in May 2018.He offers Holy Mass interpreting St. Thomas Aquinas as contradicting himself and Tradition.Like the Cushingite Dominicans, he holds the liberal position on Vatican Council II.It is interpreted as a rupture with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).He reaches this conclusion by using a false premise and inference.So the understanding of the Creeds are changed and there is a doctrinal mess.

AQUINAS CONTRADICTS HIMSELF FOR TMC
The TMC is non-traditional and a rupture with St. Thomas Aquinas who held the strict interpretation of EENS.Hypothetical and speculative cases of BOD,BOB and I.I could only be speculative.They were not objective exceptions to his traditional understanding of no salvation outside the Church.They were not exceptions to his 'Feeneyite' understanding of EENS.The TMC would misinterpret Aquinas when he mentions the speculative man in the forest in ignorance or the case of the unknown catechumen saved with only the desire for the baptism of water. 1

CATECHISM OF PIUS X CONTRADICTS ITSELF
The TMC faculty also teach the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Church for salvation. This Catechism is Feeneyite. Since when it mentions invincible ignorance, it is not a reference to a visible and practically known exception to EENS.But the Catechisms are interpreted with Cushingism.This is the teaching norm at TMC.2 So the Catechism of Pope Pius X would contradict the Syllabus of Errors ( ecuemnism of return etc.) The Catechisms and other Church documents are interpreted with the hermeneutic of rupture, even though a rational choice is available.

This is the doctrine that the two popes and Fr. Thomas Crean reject by using a false premise and inference.

1.Nicene Creed.

2.Athanasius Creed.

3.Apostles Creed.

4.Extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

5.Vatican Council II.

6.Catechism of the Catholic Church.

7.Catechism of the Council of Trent and other Catechisms.

VIOLATES THE PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION

They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction.
There is is a factual error. It is a fact of life that we cannot physically see people saved in Heaven and neither in general can we see them on earth.So people saved in Heaven with the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood( BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) who cannot be seen on earth cannot be objective examples of salvation outside the Church. They cannot be exceptions to the traditional teaching on all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.People who do not exist in our reality cannot be exceptions.

HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY FOR ME

For me there is no rupture between Vatican Council II and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. Similarly the Catechisms are also interpreted with the hermeneutic of continuity.

This would not be true for the Dominican priest. He rejects EENS as it was known to the Jesuits in the 16th century.He rejects EENS as it was known to St. Dominic.This is the norm for the Dominicans today.

I do not interpret the Creeds as contradicting themselves.This is an an error of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is irrational and heretical. However it is acceptable for the two popes, the CDF and the Domicans.

I affirm EENS like the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.They do not do the same.

SACRILEGE
For me they are in public heresy and the popes, cardinals and bishops offer Holy Mass in sacrilege. In public they, like Fr. Crean op, will not affirm Magisterial documents of the Catholic Church rationally and traditionally.Instead they will choose a hermeneutic of rupture.

The Mass offered by the Dominican priest at the TMC chapel may be valid but it is in scandal. There is an impediment which is not denied by the TMC faculty.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal-arts-tmc.html

ibid

DECEMBER 8, 2018

Thomas More College of Liberal Arts rejects Catholic Tradition by irrationally interpreting Vatican Council II. This has the approval of the two popes, the political Left and the college accreditors :I support Tradition by re-interpreting Vatican Council II rationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal-arts.html

DECEMBER 8, 2018

Thomas More College of Liberal Arts rejects Catholic Tradition by irrationally interpreting Vatican Council II. This has the approval of the two popes, the political Left and the college accreditors :I support Tradition by re-interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/thomas-more-college-of-liberal-arts.html