Sunday, April 8, 2018

Even members of the Lay Movements in the Catholic Church can proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King

Even members of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal Movement can proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.They can teach this in their families and proclaim it at their meetings.They can have Quas Primas and other encyclicals and writings of the popes read among family and friends.
They first affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is in harmony with Vatican Council II (AG 7) and is not contradicted by LG 8, LG 16, GS 22 etc.Then based on the necessity of all being Catholic, to avoid Hell,they proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King as a priority in politics with the non separation of Church and State.



So affirming EENS according to the missionaries of the 16th century is not restricted to the Traditional Latin Mass. 
Similarly affirming the necessity of the Social Reign of Jesus Christ as King, is not limited to traditionalists. Even members of the Lay Movements(Focolares etc) can affirm it. Since Vatican Council II, interpreted with Feeneyite philosophy and theology, is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. There is no change in the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, it is Feeneyite and not Cushingite and there is no change, theologically, on an ecumenism of return.
With all non Catholics needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members to avoid Hell, it is important that the social and political laws of the country work towards this end; the salvation of the most number of people possible.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 8, 2018


So for Fr. Paul McGregor the Social Reign of Christ the King must be taught in the Catholic family and its implementation will happen in future in Russia and the rest of the world when Our Lady's Immaculate Heart will Triumph

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/so-for-fr-paul-mcgregor-social-reign-of.html

So for Fr. Paul McGregor the Social Reign of Christ the King must be taught in the Catholic family and its implementation will happen in future in Russia and the rest of the world when Our Lady's Immaculate Heart will Triumph.


Fr.Paul McGregor has got the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) correct.So proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King in the family and the country is important.
Jesus Christ must be King and Lord of all creation and all laws and political systems in a country, since Jesus is God.

The Bible refers to Jesus as King and Lord whose Kingdom is there in the world after death, at the end of time and must have its fullness in present time on earth.

THY KINGDOM COME ON EARTH REFERS TO THE SOCIAL REIGN
So when Fr. Paul McGregor prays the Lord's Prayer, and says 'Thy Kingdom come' he refers to the Social Reign of Christ over all political systems in the countries.
It is with Feeneyite philosophy ( hypotheticals are just hypotheticals,invisible people are not visible) and Feeneyite theology( outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation, invisible baptism of desire etc is not visible) that we see the necessity of proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.

So Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church must be interpreted with Feeneyism( according to L.A) and then it is simple to proclaim the necessity of the non separation of Church and State.
Vatican Council II and the Catechisms interpreted with Cushingite philosophy (hypothetical and invisible cases are non hypothetical and visible people) and Cushingite theology ( there is known salvation outside the Church,every one does not need to be a member for salvation) creates a rupture with the past ecclesiology and the dogma EENS.Since with there being alleged known salvation outside the Catholic Church, there are exceptions to the old ecclesiology.There is no more an ecumenism of return since there are supposedly known non Catholics saved outside the Church.Catholic faith and the baptism is not necessary for salvation, in some or many cases.So the Social Reign of Christ the King is no more a priority. With Cushingite theology EENS is no more like it was in the 16th century. Pope Benedict said this in March 2016 (Avvenire).For his Cushingite Magisterium the Social Reign of Christ the King was no more a priority, as it was in the 16th century when there was mission to other countries with traditional doctrine.Their theology was Feeneyite( invisible cases of the baptism of desire are not visible exceptions to traditional EENS).
That same traditional doctrine is supported by Vatican Council II interpreted with Feeneyism. So LG 8, LG 16, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc is not a rupture with the 16th century EENS.Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) is in line with the 16th century Magisterium. Similarly the Catechism of the Catholic Church( 1257, 845,846) is in harmony with traditional mission doctrine.It supports the old ecclesiology of the 16th century. Pope Benedict interpreted the Catechism and Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of rupture.Cushingism causes it.

So we can still proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King today without rejecting Vatican Council II and the Catechism.

When Catholics interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church without the false premise ( unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance are known) then like the 16th century missionaries they can say that membership in the Church is necessary for salvation and so is the Social Reign of Christ the King, which must be part of the manifesto of all Catholic political parties.


So for Fr. Paul McGregor the Social Reign of Christ the King must be taught in the Catholic family and its implementation will happen in future in Russia and the rest of the world, when Our Lady's Immaculate Heart will Triumph.-Lionel Andrades



APRIL 8, 2018


Fr.Paul McDonald is really saying he supports an exclusivist ecclesiology with no dual conclusions, heterodox passages, no passages against EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/frpaul-mcdonald-is-really-saying.html



APRIL 7, 2018

Even Vatican II says every one on the face of the earth is called to become a member of the Mystical Body ( the Catholic Church)- Fr.Paul McDonald , Fatima Center http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/even-vatican-ii-says-every-one-on-face.htm



APRIL 7, 2018




There is no known exception to the exclusive ecclesiology of the Church on salvation so we have the old evangelisation today






 APRIL 7, 2018


The New Evangelisation needs to be avoided : the theology of the 'Old Evangelisation' is supported by Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-new-evangelisation-needs-to-be.html


Fr.Paul McDonald is really saying he supports an exclusivist ecclesiology with no dual conclusions, heterodox passages, no passages against EENS

When Fr.Paul McDonald said 'Even Vatican Council II says every one on the face of the earth is called to become a member of the Mystical Body(The Catholic Church)' it means there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, every one needs to be Catholic to go to Heaven.This is  Vatican Council II.

VATICAN COUNCIL II HAVING ORTHODOX AND HETERODOX PASSAGES INDICATES  CUSHINGISM
For me the Council only says all need to enter the Church and it does not say that there are exceptions.There is no dual reading of Vatican Council II.No orthodox and heterodox passages for me.There are no for and against extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) passages in Vatican Council, for me.
This is a very important point to note. Since most people err here.

A FALSE PREMISE CREATES THE DUAL APPROACH IN READING VATICAN COUNCIL II
Most people use the dual approach in the interpretation.It's Yes and No, orthodox and heterodox, for and against EENS.
This comes about by using a false premise.This is how the  seemingly unorthodox passages are created.

ALLEGED HETERODOX PASSAGES IN VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE HYPOTHETICAL FOR ME
For me Vatican Council II only affirms the exclusive ecclesiology of salvation in the Catholic Church. Since the allegedly heterodox passages are hypothetical for me. So they are not exceptions to EENS.Rationally they cannot be anything else.The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance for example can only be a hypothetical case for us humans.

FEENEYITE WAY OF READING VATICAN COUNCIL II
The hypothetical passages in LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not exceptions to EENS in 2018.This I call the Feeneyite way of reading Vatican Council II.With the Feeneyite approach Vatican Council II is saying, solely, 'every one on the face of the earth is called to become a member of the Mystical Body'(AG 7).

MAGISTERIUM USES THE FOR AND AGAINST METHOD TO READ VATICAN COUNCIL II
But this is not how the present Magisterium reads Vatican Council II.They use the for and against EENS method instead of the for and neutral to EENS method so there is a rupture with Tradition. With the for and neutral to EENS approach the 'controversial' passages would not be unorthodox or even relevant to EENS.
The for and against EENS method  is created, I repeat,  by assuming references to hypotheticals are non hypothetical but instead objective in the present times.
So there are the orthodox passages  which support EENS  and the 'unorthodox passages' which are interpreted as being exceptions to EENS. This I call Cushingism.

CUSHINGISM CONSIDERS ORTHODOX PASSAGES AS REFERRING TO OBJECTIVE PEOPLE
Cushingism considers the 'unorthodox passages' in Vatican Council II as referring to explicit cases while Feeneyism considers them to be just hypothetical cases only.This is a crucial point. Here it is where the road forks and most people take the wrong turn.

SEEMINGLY HETERODOX PASSAGES ARE NOT EXCEPTIONS TO THE ORTHODOX PASSAGES FOR ME
When I read what is commonly considered 'the heterodox passages' they are neither heterodox nor exceptions to the orthodox passages. I just brush them off as being hypothetical.Hypotheticals cannot be real and concrete examples of salvation outside the Church in 2018.

FR. PAUL MCDONALD  AFFIRMS THE OLD ECCLESIOLOGY
So without 'the heterodox passages', the hypotheticals coming in his way Fr. Paul  McDonald would be saying 'Even Vatican Council II says every one on the face of the earth is called to become a member of the Mystical Body(The Catholic Church)' there are no practical exceptions in 2018 and none mentioned in the Council text.None.

Mission doctrine today is the same as that of the Jesuits in the 16th century when Vatican Council II is interpreted with Feeneyism instead of the common and irrational Cushingism.There is no known salvation outside the Church to contract the 16th century exclusivist ecclesiology.
This is the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.It is premise-free. The Council II can really only be Feeneyite and a Cushingite interpretation does not make sense.It is irrational. How can people in Heaven be visible exceptions to the dogma EENS on earth ? How can invisible people on earth be visible exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church? If someone does not exist how can be relevant to EENS as an exception?

REDEMPTORIS MISSIO AND DOMINUS WERE CUSHINGITE
So when we read Vatican Council II we can choose to see the exclusivist ecclesiology or a general Christology.In Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus, Cardinal Ratzinger chose an ecumenical Christology and rejected the past exclusivist ecclesiology.
We do not reject the Christology and nor the exclusivist ecclesiology of Vatican Council II.-Lionel  Andrades


APRIL 7, 2018


Even Vatican II says every one on the face of the earth is called to become a member of the Mystical Body ( the Catholic Church)- Fr.Paul McDonald , Fatima Center

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/even-vatican-ii-says-every-one-on-face.html



APRIL 7, 2018







There is no known exception to the exclusive ecclesiology of the Church on salvation so we have the old evangelisation today

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/there-is-no-known-exception-to.html

Divine Mercy Sunday today

DIVINE MERCY SUNDAY Conditions for the Plenary Indulgence


Three conditions for the plenary indulgence
The Supreme Pontiff, motivated by an ardent desire to foster in Christians this devotion to Divine Mercy as much as possible in the hope of offering great spiritual fruit to the faithful, in the Audience granted on 13 June 2002, to those Responsible for the Apostolic Penitentiary, granted the following Indulgences:
a plenary indulgence, granted under the usual conditions (sacramental confession, Eucharistic communion and prayer for the intentions of Supreme Pontiff) to the faithful who, on the Second Sunday of Easter or Divine Mercy Sunday, in any church or chapel, in a spirit that is completely detached from the affection for a sin, even a venial sin, take part in the prayers and devotions held in honour of Divine Mercy, or who, in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament exposed or reserved in the tabernacle, recite the Our Father and the Creed, adding a devout prayer to the merciful Lord Jesus (e.g. Merciful Jesus, I trust in you!");
A partial indulgence, granted to the faithful who, at least with a contrite heart, pray to the merciful Lord Jesus a legitimately approved invocation.
https://gloria.tv/photo/ZPFyDkBXTyu71vvdsGFes4U1i