Thursday, July 5, 2018

These points should be clarified by the religious communities who are in communication with the CDF and Ecclesia Dei.Ask them if everyone can interpret Vatican Council II and EENS as does the blogger on Lionel's Blog.

I have been e-mailing these blog posts to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Ecclesia Dei and other Vatican offices. I have also been sending them to the concerned bishops and those who are mentioned specifically in the post,giving them a chance to respond.
Image result for Photos Check it out
In a blog post today morning I wrote  :-
I wish to reiterate that I affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church. I affirm magisterial documents however I interpret them with the philosophy and theology of Feeneyism, which is rational and traditional. I do not use the common Cushingite interpretation, which creates a rupture with past-popes and the saints, who were Feeneyite.They interpreted the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) with Feeneyism.They did not imply that BOD, BOB and I.I referred to known, non Catholics,  saved outside the Church,in the present times, without 'faith and baptism' (AG 7,LG 14).
So I can affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS-Feeneyite) and there is no rupture with Tradition( Syllabus of Errrors etc).
The Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) can say the same thing as me and ask Ecclesia Dei if this is acceptable for them.Similarly the Bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas can do same and Vatican Council II would be no reason to remain in sedevacantism.
I wrote:
Since I do not have a problem with Vatican Council II I do not have to go into sedevacantism based on the Council, as many Catholics have done.
Since the past ecclesiology of the Church has not changed for me, before and after Vatican Council II, I can attend the Traditional Latin Mass, Byzantine Mass and Mass in the vernacular,with no change in ecclesiology and of course, without the New Theology, Cushingite Theology.
Since I affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise, the Council is not ' a development' with Feeneyite EENS for me, as it was for Pope Benedict (March 2016,Avvenire).For me EENS today is the same as it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Likewise Lumen Gentium 8 refers to only hypothetical cases for me in 2018 and so is not an exception to the old understanding of there being exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.So unlike Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, at the Placuit Deo Press conference(March 1,2018), I would say that  the Catholic Church still has an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation.
All Catholic religious communities, those who have canonical recognition and those who do not, can switch to my interpretation of Vatican Council II, EENS and other magisterial documents.
Image result for Photos Ask them
The way is open.
The CDF cannot insist that you continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus etc).
I wrote:-
So my understanding of the Nicene Creed would be different from the common Cushingite interpretation  and my  understanding and teaching of Church History, would be different, in its emphasis, from that of the pontifical universities in Rome.
Since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective error, for me,I would reject some of the theological opinions, supported by ecclesiastics, and the present two popes.
This is an important point. How do you interpret the Nicene Creed ? How can there be two or more understandings of the Nicene Creed? Similarly how can the Athanasius Creed which affirms EENS be rejected? How can Catholics today officially have different understandings of the Apostles Creed ?  
How can there be different meanings in the Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity ? What about the Oath Against Modernism ? Is it not modernism to have two different interpretations of Vatican Council II and EENS?
Image result for Photos Ask them
These points should be clarified by the religious communities who are in communication with the CDF and Ecclesia Dei.Ask them if everyone can interpret Vatican Council II and EENS as does the blogger on Lionel's Blog.
-Lionel Andrades




JULY 5, 2018

Reiterate

direttive della massoneria per distruggere la chiesa cattolica.

messaggio importante di Gesù.Gesù rivela all'umanità il ruolo di sua madre

Il sole di Medjugorje: nessun inganno o allucinazione | UCCR

Sole che pulsa Medjugorje prima dell'apparizione del 2 luglio 2017

Bosco di Zaro sole che pulsa

Save the Family, Save the World (Michael Matt, London)

Reiterate



I wish to reiterate that I affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church. I affirm magisterial documents however I interpret them with the philosophy and theology of Feeneyism, which is rational and traditional. I do not use the common Cushingite interpretation, which creates a rupture with past-popes and the saints, who were Feeneyite.They interpreted the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) with Feeneyism.They did not imply that BOD, BOB and I.I referred to known, non Catholics,  saved outside the Church,in the present times, without 'faith and baptism' (AG 7,LG 14).
So I can affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS-Feeneyite) and there is no rupture with Tradition( Syllabus of Errrors etc).
Since I do not have a problem with Vatican Council II I do not have to go into sedevacantism based on the Council, as many Catholics have done.
Since the past ecclesiology of the Church has not changed for me, before and after Vatican Council II, I can attend the Traditional Latin Mass, Byzantine Mass and Mass in the vernacular,with no change in ecclesiology and of course, without the New Theology, Cushingite Theology.
Since I affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise, the Council is not ' a development' with Feeneyite EENS for me, as it was for Pope Benedict (March 2016,Avvenire).For me EENS today is the same as it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Likewise Lumen Gentium 8 refers to only hypothetical cases for me in 2018 and so is not an exception to the old understanding of there being exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.So unlike Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, at the Placuit Deo Press conference(March1,2018), I would say that  the Catholic Church still has an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation.
So my understanding of the Nicene Creed would be different from the common Cushingite interpretation  and my  understanding and teaching of Church History, would be different, in its emphasis, from that of the pontifical universities in Rome.
Since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective error, for me,I would reject some of the theological opinions, supported by ecclesiastics, and the present two popes.-Lionel Andrades




JULY 4, 2018

Ten prominent examples of Cushingism in the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/ten-prominent-examples-of-cushingism-in.html




JULY 3, 2018





Bishops Fellay, Sanborn and Pivarunas are making the same error as the popes from Pius XII to Francis

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/bishops-fellay-sanborn-and-pivarus-are.html












JULY 2, 2018



Since for Ludwig Ott there are exceptions to EENS,the old Catechisms would also be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology.It would contradict an ecumenism of return and no salvation outside the Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/since-for-ludwig-ott-there-are.html







 JULY 2, 2018

The Baltimore Catechism can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-baltimore-catechism-can-be.html



 JULY 2, 2018



The Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen(CMRI) needs to correct the error on their website and come out of the sedevacantism based on Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-congregation-of-mary-immaculate.html



ULY 1, 2018


Bishop Bernard Fellay is ready to accept a personal prelature and Vatican Council II (Cushingite) without asking Rome to come back to the Faith by affirming Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and interpreting the Nicene Creed, all the Catechisms, the encyclicals and magisterial documents with rational Feeneyism, so as not to create a rupture with Tradition

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/bishop-bernard-fellay-is-ready-to.html