Thursday, August 2, 2018

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria : Official text with Abjuration and Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity

Here is the official text of the Profession of Faith and the Oath of Fidelity from the Vatican website. Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj,Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican,would abjure his errors and confirm the faith in the  points mentioned in the brackets.

The Holy See

PROFESSION OF FAITH

I, Luiz Ladaria,, with firm faith believe and profess each and everything that is contained in the Symbol of faith, namely:
I believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God,

born of the Father before all ages. God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father; through him all things were made. For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven, and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and became man. For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried, and rose again on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and his kingdom will have no end. I believe in the Holy Spirit ( who teaches the Church that outside the Church there is no salvation and that all non Catholics in the present times are oriented to Hell with no known exception),the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, who has spoken through the prophets. I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church ( outside of which there is no salvation and all need to be members of this Church to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.Since in Heaven there are only Catholics.) 

I confess  one baptism for the forgiveness of sins ( which is the baptism of water and not three  or more known baptisms BOD, BOB and I.I,which  also exclude the baptism of water) and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.

With firm faith, I also believe everything contained in the word of God, whether written or handed down in Tradition, which the Church, either by a solemn judgment or by the ordinary and universal Magisterium, sets forth to be believed as divinely revealed.( and this includes the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as defined by three Church Councils and supported by Vatican Council II(AG 7).It is important to note that in Vatican Council II,  LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not practical exceptions to EENS)
I also firmly accept and hold each and everything definitively proposed by the Church regarding teaching on faith and morals.( this means there are no visible and personally known exceptions in faith and morals. We cannot judge when manifest mortal sin is not a mortal sin and a Catholic can be given the Eucharist.If there is an exception it can only be known to God.
Neither can we judge practical exceptions to the traditional teachings on faith and salvation, in particular the dogma EENS, with  BOD, BOB and I.I not being known people whom we can judge saved outside the Church.
 I abjure the error made  by the liberal theologians in assuming invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I were in reality visible and known people saved outside the Catholic Church)
Moreover, I adhere with religious submission of will and intellect to the teachings which either the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops enunciate when they exercise their authentic Magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim these teachings by a definitive act ( and as long as they do not contain objective error, violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and reject the traditional teachings of the Church with the use of a false premise.)
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19880701_professio-fidei_en.html






The Holy See



OATH OF FIDELITY
ON ASSUMING AN OFFICE
TO BE EXERCISED IN THE NAME OF THE CHURCH
(Formula to be used by members of the Christian faithful mentioned in canon 833, nn. 5-8)
I, Luiz Ladaria, in assuming the office of ………, promise that in my words and in my actions I shall always preserve communion with the Catholic Church.
With great care and fidelity I shall carry out the duties incumbent on me toward the Church, both universal and particular, in which, according to the provisions of the law, I have been called to exercise my service.
In fulfilling the charge entrusted to me in the name of the Church, I shall hold fast to the deposit of faith in its entirety; I shall faithfully hand it on and explain it, and I shall avoid any teachings contrary to it.
I hereby announce that I affirm the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) which refer to invisible people in 2018.They are  only  hypothetical cases and not personally known people saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times.So I affirm the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS in harmony with invisibe for us BOD, BOB and I.I.The Catholic Church still has the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation as it was known over the centuries.
I hereby announce that I affirm LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc as also referring to hypothetical cases and so they are not practical exceptions to the interpretation of the dogma EENS as it was known to the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.So Vatican Council II is not a  rupture with the 'strict interpretation ' of the dogma EENS for me.
I support the interpretation of EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney and acknowledge the mistake made by the CDF (Holy Office 1949) when they assumed invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I were visible exceptions to the dogma EENS. center. On behalf of the CDF I apologize to the St.Benedict Centers in the USA for the mistake made by my predecessors in the late 1940's.
I interpret the Nicene Creed, the Catechisms and the statements on EENS made by  the popes and saints and Church Councils , always with BOD, BOB and I.I referring to unknown and theoretical cases. If they existed they could only be known to God and would be followed by the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since this is the dogmatic teaching of the Church in the Extraordinary Magisterium ( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 etc).
Since there is no known salvation outside the Church for us, no physically visible cases, and this is common sense, I affirm the Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return. There is  no known Anonymous Christian saved outside the Church in another religion.
I do hereby abjure my errors of the past when I interpreted  BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to the known people saved outside the Church.
I hereby abjure  my error in interpreting Vatican Council II,the Catechisms, the Nicene Creed and other magisterial documents with an irrational premise, to create a rupture with Tradition(past ecclesiology, Syllabus of Errors etc)
I reject the New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology and New Evangelisation which was based on there being known salvation outside the Catholic Church and BOD, BOB and I.I being objective cases in our reality.
Since there is no known salvation outside the Church the priority for saving souls is the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King with the non separation of Church and State.
I shall follow and foster the common discipline of the entire Church and I shall maintain the observance of all ecclesiastical laws, especially those contained in the Code of Canon Law.
I shall interpret all references to BOD, BOB and I.I in Canon Law as referring to hypothetical and theoretical cases which could only be known to God. So they are not exceptions to the old ecclesiology of the Church or the understanding on outside the Church there is no salvation.
I support the SSPX General Chapter Statement on Doctrine(2012) which affirmed traditional EENS and I reject the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which was based on an objective mistake( non Catholics who have died outside the Church and are saved in Heaven are visible on earth to be objective exceptions to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation) which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.
I abjure my statement on March 1,2018 at the Placeut Deo Press Conference when I suggested there were known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church and this was indicated in Lumen Gentium 8( subsists in). So I wrongly said that the Church no more has a superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.
I abjure the statement of Pope Benedict XVI in March 2016 in the interview with Avvenire.He said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century,since for him, there was a development with Vatican Council II. He meant Vatican Council II interpreted with LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.
I do not support his suggesting that Vatican Council II ended the motiviation for mission. For me there is no known salvation outside the Church. So the traditional understanding of mission, as it was known to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages has not changed.
With Christian obedience I shall follow what the Bishops, as authentic doctors and teachers of the faith, declare, or what they, as those who govern the Church, establish.
I shall obey the  Bishops when they are in harmony with the past ecclesiology and are not teaching innovations based on hypothetical cases not being hypothetical in the present times.Then I have the obligation to reject it since this is not the Deposit of the Faith.
 I shall also faithfully assist the diocesan Bishops, so that the apostolic activity, exercised in the name and by mandate of the Church, may be carried out in communion with the Church.
So help me God, and God’s Holy Gospels on which I place my hand.

(Variations in the fourth and fifth paragraphs of the formulary,

for use by those members of the Christian faithful indicated in can. 833, n. 8)

I shall foster the common discipline of the entire Church and I shall insist on the observance of all ecclesiastical laws, especially those contained in the Code of Canon Law.
I shall reject disunity created  when the Code of Canon Law is interpreted as saying unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known, and that  invisible cases are objective exceptions to EENS and the  Syllabus of Errors.
With Christian obedience I shall follow what the Bishops, as authentic doctors and teachers of the faith, declare, or what they, as those who govern the Church, establish. I shall also — with due regard for the character and purpose of my institute — faithfully assist the diocesan Bishops, so that the apostolic activity, exercised in the name and by mandate of the Church, may be carried out in communion with the Church.
(Compiled by Lionel Andrades as a public service for Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and the Catholic Church  the Mystical Body of Jesus.It can be used freely by any one and no permission is required from me).
-Lionel Andrades

____________________________________




AUGUST 2, 2018

Card.Luiz Ladaria's Oath of Office and Profession of Faith was false and an oath to Modernism : he should not have canonical recognition unless he abjures his errrors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/cardinal-luiz-ladarias-oath-of-office.html


AUGUST 2, 2018

Religious communities are not questioning the canonical recognition of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria (Grafics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/religious-communities-are-not.html




AUGUST 2, 2018

Religious communities are not telling Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF, that all this confusion cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit and so it is not magisterial

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/religious-communities-are-not-telling.html

______________________________________

Card.Luiz Ladaria's Oath of Office and Profession of Faith was false and an oath to Modernism : he should not have canonical recognition unless he abjures his errors

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's Oath of Office was false since he misinterpreted the Nicene Creed, which he had to read out, with irrational Cushingite theology. When he became the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) he interpreted the Nicene Creed differently from me.So his Profession of Faith would also be different. He chose the modernist version.
So the result is with Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism there is a rupture with Tradition for him. I avoid Cushingism and so I am back to the old theology.Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition for me.-Lionel Andrades















































-

AUGUST 2, 2018

Religious communities are not questioning the canonical recognition of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria (Grafics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/religious-communities-are-not.html




AUGUST 2, 2018

Religious communities are not telling Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF, that all this confusion cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit and so it is not magisterial



http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/religious-communities-are-not-telling.html

______________________________________



AUGUST 1, 2018



Repost : I love Vatican Council II it has the hermeneutic of continuity with the past ecclesiology of an ecumenism of return

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/repost-i-love-vatican-council-ii-it-has.html


_________________________________________________________

Religious communities are not questioning the canonical recognition of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria (Grafics)





-Lionel Andrades

 AUGUST 2, 2018


Religious communities are not telling Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF, that all this confusion cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit and so it is not magisterial

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/religious-communities-are-not-telling.html

Repost : Did Ludwig Ott infer all this?

NOVEMBER 7, 2016


Did Ludwig Ott infer all this?

Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma
In Response to a Comment on The Remnant Newspaper.
I read The Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma by Ludwig Ott a long time back.I do not have a copy here with me.
What does he say?
1.Does he say that there is connection between the baptism of desire and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus; all need to receieve the baptism of water in the Catholic Church with no exception?
2.Does he say that the baptism of desire is explicit? It is personally known in the present times?
3.Does he say that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water?
4.Does he infer that the baptism of desire and baptism of blood must always exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church or always include it?
5.Does he say that in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued, there were known cases of the baptism of desire with or without the baptism of water?
If he does not say all this, then is this  your inference ? You infer all this like the liberal theologians did in 1949?


For you it is as follows ?:
1.There is a connection between the baptism of desire and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since there are personally known cases, for you, in the present times, saved with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water.You know of exceptions to EENS.
2.The baptism of desire is explicit for you, objectively seen in personal cases.So it is relevant to EENS.They are visible exceptions to EENS.
3.Since the baptism of desire is visible in personal cases for you, it is something tangible like the baptism of water and so it can be repeatedly given to many, like the baptism of water.
4.The baptism of desire must always exclude the baptism of water,this is what God chose in the past and also for the future in every case of this kind.
5.In 1949 they knew of people who died with the baptism of desire and were saved and are now in Heaven, without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
-Lionel Andrades



Repost : Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma is Cushingite, it overlooks an irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Prof Robert Fastiggi also use the false premise to interpret BOD, BOB and I.I and Magisterial documents to create a schism with the past popes

JUNE 1, 2018

Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma is Cushingite, it overlooks an irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Prof Robert Fastiggi also use the false premise to interpret BOD, BOB and I.I and Magisterial documents to create a schism with the past popes
Luwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogmauses Cushingite philosophy and theology.So it assumes that unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), as it was known to the popes and saints of the past.
For the Magisterium in the 16th century, EENS was Feeneyite and not Cushingite, since BOD, BOB and I.l were Feeneyite and not Cushingite.
So this is a theological and doctrinal flaw in Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma and it,like the Arian heresy of the past,  has spread throughout the Catholic Church today.
It is also with Cushingism that Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Prof. Robert Fastiggi interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.
Prof. Fastiggi is critical of Fr. Leonard Feeney. But Fr.Feeney did not say that he could see invisible people on earth, he refused to say that people in Heaven were objective exceptions on earth to the traditional interpretation of EENS. He did  not interpret BOD,BOB and I.I with Cushingism,like Prof. Fastiggi, Ralph Martin and Phillip Blosser and the rest of the faculty at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, USA.
In 1949 the Holy Office made a mistake when it assumed invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I were visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. It also created a schism with the past popes. The Cushingite error was repeated in Vatican Council II by Council Fathers and Cardinal Ratzinger upheld the mistake in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994), Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Balamand Declaration, Code of Canon Law (1983) and two theological papers of the International Theological Commission.It was a direct attack on the dogma EENS with the use of an irrational premise to create a non traditional conclusion.
Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma is used in religions formation by Catholic traditionalists and liberals.
Like the apologists John Hardon, Monsgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton and Fr. William Most, Ott did not know that BOD, BOB and I.I were being interpreted by the liberal theologians as a rupture with Tradition.They did this by confusing what is invisible as visible, implicit as explicit and hypothetical as being defacto and objective known in the present times.So their narrative was that Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura and the Catechisms of Pius X and Trent contradicted Feeneyite EENS when BOD, BOB and I.I were mentioned. But this was false. Since BOD, BOB and I.I can only be hypothetical. This is a given. This was how St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine understood it.
Fr.John Hardon used this flawed reasoning also in the interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994)  and Vatican Council II.
For me, the Catechism(1994) and Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism, that is , without the false premise.So the conclusion is not a rupture with Tradition.
-Lionel Andrades

From Rorate Caeili
A few weeks ago Baronius Press released what it describes as a new edition of Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma. Although based on the original translation by Dr. Patrick Lynch it has been "fully revised and updated" by Dr. Robert Fastiggi, apparently in the light of Ott's 1969 German text of the Fundamentals. The preface to the new edition by Dr. Fastiggi -- full text on the Baronius Press website -- describes at length the revisions made to the translation. In the preface, Fastiggi notes that "(w)hile Fr. Ott made some revisions in 1969, it would be wrong to find in these any notable change in his theological posture from the decade prior to Vatican II. Ludwig Ott always remained faithful to the Church’s perennial Magisterium, and he is careful to distinguish theological speculations from the constant teaching of the Church"

For this edition of the Fundamentals the Foreword came from no other than Bishop Athanasius Schneider. The full text, as provided on the Baronius Press website:


Ludwig Ott’s Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma has proven to be an indispensable guide to Catholic doctrine since it was first published in the 1950’s. Whether in the original language or in its French and English translations, it has been favoured by generations of readers because of its rare combination of relative brevity with comprehensiveness. I congratulate Baronius Press and Dr. Robert Fastiggi for bringing out this comprehensively revised translation of the last edition of the Fundamentals.


We live at a time of grave doctrinal confusion when the sheep are often left without shepherds. Against the dangers of doctrinal ambiguity and the loss of clarity in moral matters, the faithful are called more than ever to seek to know their faith, so they can defend it and pass it on to their children. Catechism is necessary, but perhaps now it is not enough to only know one’s Catechism. The subtlety of the many contemporary errors assaulting the faith practically require from the ordinary faithful today a good understanding of Catholic doctrine that is not separated from its traditional and immutable roots. For this task, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma is eminently suitable. It presents the immutable truths of Catholic theology backed by the teachings of the Magisterium in the past two millennia, not the latest speculations of fashionable and media-friendly theologians who in reality want another religion. It uses language that is simple and clear – virtues often forgotten today – and is brief enough to fit into one volume. May it help the light of faith shine clearer and brighter for countless Catholic faithful, may it help them live the faith in all its purity. And to all who read this book I grant my blessing.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider, O.R.C.,
Titular Bishop of Celerina
Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana

 https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2018/06/for-record-baronius-press-revised.html



From the tags/labels in the right hand bar 











































Lionel Andrades