Monday, August 6, 2018

One more nunnery to close


One more nunnery to close




When nuns do not interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) then this must be the result.
If they affirmed Vatican Council II and EENS Feeneyite they would be speaking the truth. They would be saying that only the Catholic Church is the way to get to Heaven.
They would be saying that all young people who die outside the Church  would be going to  Hell.Since they would end their life without faith and baptism which is needed for salvation( Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II ).
They would be threathened.
They would be persecuted. Their faith would be strong.
Their faith would get stronger.They would know that they could be killed any time.They would know that their life is precious and their work is important.
They would know that the Catholic faith is not just a social thing. It has serious consequences.
The lay people would see this  and they would want to help.Many of them.
They would be inspired like the saints and martyrs of the past who believed in EENS.Their life would take on a new meaning since their faith would be different.
So it is important for all Catholics to affirm Vatican Council II and EENS, not according to the present two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
They must not affirm Vatican Council II and EENS like the traditionalists or the liberals.
They must understand that the Catholic Faith does not change though it has been changed by the traditionalists, conservatives and liberals.
They need to independently, affirm Vatican Council II and EENS without the irrational premise, without the Cushingite theology, without the nonsense which is approved for the Catholic Church by the Jewish Left rabbis holding the Anti-Semitic weapon pointed at the Church.
The Religious Sisters today need to form new communities and register themselves as lay societies.They must live the vows of poverty.Strict poverty, depending fully on God's Providence, like the communities of St. Theresa of Avila. Then they must affirm EENS, just like St. Theresa of Avila.They would live their vocation today, without rejecting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Catholic Church, which they would interpret with Feeneyism, which is rational and traditional as a philosophy and theology.-Lionel Andrades 


https://gloria.tv/language/S2mQ8XjTcSwL3q8noxk8XEbJo

____________________________________________________________

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Tommy Robinson tells Ezra Levant about prison treat...

Tommy Robinson interview with Tucker Carlson




Whispers of Restoration a group of anonymous traditionalists,heretics and schismatics, who interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, with a false premise, and so create a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Syllabus of Errors and past Catechisms

The team at Whispers of Restoration have not responded to these blog posts and for me remain a group of anonymous traditionalists,heretics and schismatics, who interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, with a false premise, and so create a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors.They are in schism with the past popes on EENS since down the centuries, the popes did not assume there were invisible baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible cases which were objective exceptions to the dogma EENS and the past ecclesiology of the Church.They did not mistake hypothetical cases as being non hypothetical.
The traditional catechisms placed on Whispers of Restoration are interpreted  with a false premise.The anonymous team at the website use Cushingism.So  BOD, BOB and I.I become a rupture with the past ecclesiolgy of the Church.They are a rupture with all those popes on salvation.
Whispers of Restoration interpret the traditional catechisms on their website, with the false premise( visible BOD, BOB and I.I).So this creates a rupture, with the past popes.
It is also a rupture with those of us today who interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise.
For those of us today who interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism( invisible non Catholics are not visible in the present times), there is no rupture with BOD, BOB and I.I when they are mentioned in the traditional Catechisms( Council of Trent etc)-
The anonymous team in ignorance of Cushingism, invites the criticism  of the liberals, who are also Cushingites.The liberals do not know about an alternative way to interpret Magisterial documents.They only know of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) in which BOD, BOB and I.I are practical exceptions to EENS. So would consider the anonymous team at this website in heresy for not affirming Vatican Council II (Cushingite).
The traditionalists at Whispers of Restoration, are also creating unnecessary confusion  for conservative Catholics, who interpret all magisterial documents with Feeneyism.Since they do not have to reject the past ecclesiology, the old catechisms,Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994), all, interpreted with Feeneyism i.e invisible people are invisible, BOD, BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases only and so are not objective, practical exceptions to traditional EENS.
Whispers of Restoration with their visible for them BOD, BOB and I.I reject Feeneyite EENS, a Feeneyite past ecclesiology, a Feeneyite Syllabus of Errors, Feeneyite traditional Catechisms,a Feeneyite Nicene Creed....
Whispers of Restoration reflects an obsolete school of Catholic traditionalists.They are innocently and simply ignorant of Feeneyism as an interpretative tool.So they are also not aware that they are in heresy and schism, as are the liberals and Vatican ecclesiastics and the two popes, since they all interpret  magisterial documents, with the New Theology, Cushingite Theology.-Lionel Andrades

Doesn't Louie see his heresy somewhere in all this?

Louie Verrechio has interpreted UR 3 in Vatican Council II, with the false premise.1   
I responded with a blog post and e-mailed him the correction. 2
He wrongly assumed that a hypothetical case is non hypothetical and instead is an example of salvation outside the Church. So with this false premise ( invisible non Catholics saved are visible) there is a false inference. For him there are visible and known Catholics saved outside the Church and they are exceptions to EENS. So of course,for him, Vatican Council II( UR 3) contradicts EENS and the old ecclesiology and this is heresy.He calls it heresy.
He blames Vatican Council II but the fault lies with him.
I affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise. Invisible cases of non Catholics saved are not visible.The Council is in harmony with traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There is no heresy.Vatican Council II is not heretical.
Louie  could also interpret Vatican Council II like me.There would be no confusion and heresy.
So for me it is Louie Verrecchio who would be in heresy, for example, with the Magisterium of the 16th century.
In the 16th century if the Jesuits interpreted EENS with invisible baptism of desire being a visible exception to all needing to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation,it would be heresy.
Yet this is how Louie and the traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II today.
So he would be interpreting all the old catechisms( Council of Trent, Pius X etc), which affirm the past ecclesiology, with hypothetical cases not being hypothetical.So BOD, BOB and I.I mentioned in those old catechisms would become a rupture with the past ecclesiology, and EENS, as it was interpreted in the 16th century.
Those catechisms would also be a rupture for Louie, with the Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return and no salvation for non Christians.Since BOD, BOB and I.I would be exceptions, of course.This was the reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
So with BOD, BOB and I.I referring to known people saved outside the Church, the old catechisms are a rupture with EENS, as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
Vatican Council II is rupture with EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
Vatican Council II would also be a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors for him.
Vatican Council II is a rupture with the old catechisms,EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.It would also have changed the interpretation of the Nicene Creed.
What a mess.
Doesn't Louie see his heresy somewhere in all this?
-Lionel Andrades


1.

Bishop Fellay: A troubling interview

https://akacatholic.com/bishop-fellay-interview/


2.

JULY 31, 2018

AKA Catholic

UR 3 with Cushingism is heretical since it rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.With Feeneyism it is not heretical
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/ur-3-with-cushingism-is-heretical-since.html




 AUGUST 5, 2018

There is not going to be a Restoration with Cushingism. Mattei and Ferrara are part of the problem. So is Whispers of Restoration and 1Peter5  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/whispers-of-restoration-have-article-on.html




JUNE 25, 2015

For you UR 3 and LG 8 are exceptions to the dogma.Why? Who do you know today who is saved as mentioned in UR 3,LG 8?  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/06/for-you-ur-3-and-lg-8-are-exceptions-to.html


MAY 8, 2018

So what is Louie waiting for , what prevents him from interpreting Vatican Council II rationally ?  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/so-what-is-louie-waiting-for-what.html



FEBRUARY 5, 2018

So the fault does not lie with Vatican Council II but with the traditionalist interpretation of the Council by using Cushingite instead of Feeneyite theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/02/so-fault-does-not-lie-with-vatican.html




The nightmare of the abortion cabal (video clip) : Massive Argentinian turn out against abortion

 4  933

The nightmare of the abortion cabal


00:53

Pro-life people speak with one voice. Yesterday in Argentina. *video by FaroFilms More
https://gloria.tv/video/7kkPwfDNmxDt67dSqE9o97giL

Spain’s Foreign Minister denies that his country is experiencing “mass migration,” says “we need new blood”


Spain’s Foreign Minister denies that his country is experiencing “mass migration,” says “we need new blood”


New blood, eh? Oh, there will be plenty of blood, much of it on the streets.
“Spain denies ‘mass’ migration, says Europe needs ‘new blood,'” by Peter O’Brien, France 24, July 31, 2018:
Spain’s Foreign Minister Josep Borrell denied Monday that the country was experiencing “mass” immigration and said Europe needed “new blood” to compensate for a low birth rate.
“We’re trivialising the word ‘mass’,” he told reporters after talks in Madrid with his Jordanian counterpart Ayman Safadi.
Close to 21,000 migrants have arrived in Spain by sea since the beginning of the year and 304 died in the attempt, the International Organization for Migration says.
The Libya-Italy Mediterranean route, which was the main one until recently, has dwindled by 80 percent while Spain has now become the main destination for migrants trying to reach Europe.
Migrants are also reaching Spain by land, with 602 managing to scramble over the double barrier between Morocco and the Spanish territory of Ceuta in North Africa last Thursday, throwing caustic quicklime, excrement and stones onto police below.
Borrell recognised that “this shocks public opinion and the disorderly nature of immigration produces fear.”
But he said it was all relative, and “600 people is not massive compared to 1.3 million” Syrian refugees currently in Jordan.
“We’re talking about 20,000 (migrants) so far this year for a country of more than 40 million inhabitants,” the Socialist minister said. “That’s not mass migration.”…
“Europe’s demographic evolution shows that unless we want to gradually turn into an ageing continent, we need new blood, and it doesn’t look like this new blood is coming from our capacity to procreate.”…
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/07/spains-foreign-minister-denies-that-his-country-is-experiencing-mass-migration-says-we-need-new-blood



Afghanistan: Muslim husband kills his nine-year-old wife


Afghanistan: Muslim husband kills his nine-year-old wife


This man’s murder of his wife is a product of the culture of violence that arises from the divine sanction given to wife-beating (Qur’an 4:34).
And as for her being nine, Islamic tradition records that Muhammad consummated his marriage with (i.e., raped) Aisha when she was nine, and the resultant fact that child marriage is accepted in wide swaths of the Islamic world. Child marriage has abundant attestation in Islamic tradition and law.
Turkey’s directorate of religious affairs (Diyanet) said in January 2018 that under Islamic law, girls as young as nine can marry.
“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria
“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law
There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council
“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology
Hadiths that Muslims consider authentic record that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).
Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.
Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.
Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:
The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.
Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”
According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.
“Badghis Husband Kills 9-Year-Old Wife,” Tolo News, July 30, 2018 (thanks to S.):
A Badghis man allegedly beat and strangled his nine-year-old wife to death on Sunday night, provincial officials confirmed on Monday.
The incident took place in Kadanak village of Qads district of the province due to “family issues,” a spokesman for the provincial governor Naqibullah Amini confirmed.
He said the child “named Samia had been married to (the suspect) Sharafuddin for two years.”
“The man fled the area after the incident,” Amini said.
The girl’s father has meanwhile been arrested by police “for forcing his daughter to marry the man,” Amini added.
Amini said the husband is about 35 years old and has another wife. He said the child had been given to Sharafuddin as “Bad” (as payment to settle a dispute)….

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/afghanistan-muslim-husband-kills-his-nine-year-old-wife


Tommy Robinson freed on bail


Tommy Robinson freed on bail

 BY 

“On Wednesday, the Court of Appeal ordered his release, pending a new hearing in his case. The court questioned the speed with which he had been tried and convicted, noting that it took five hours from the time of his arrest to a conviction.”
It was only just to free Tommy Robinson, and lessens the impression that Britain is becoming a police state in which it is illegal to criticize Islam and mass Muslim migration in Britain today. Britain is still on that road, but apparently in this case the May government was feeling too much pressure to keep Tommy in prison.
Meanwhile, note the contempt and the vicious bias of this New York Times piece. This is Leftist propaganda disguised as a news story. Tommy is “anti-Muslim,” the universal label applied to those who oppose jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women, gays, etc. Was opposing the Nazis “anti-German”?
Tommy is also a “far-right activist.” Anyone, no matter how socially liberal and how committed to the principles of secular, republican rule, is “far-right” for opposing jihad terror and Sharia oppression. There is no substance to the term other than to try to equate such opposition with Nazism.
The Times semaphores to its dwindling Leftist readership, if the point weren’t clear enough already, that Tommy is not to have their support, for he is supported by “former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon but reviled by others who call him a violent purveyor of hate.” Who calls him a “violent purveyor of hate”? Hope Not Hate, a Leftist smear group akin to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Then there is the open libel that Robinson’s “divisive, anti-Muslim rhetoric has resulted in acts of violence,” he added, the most extreme of which occurred when a man, inspired by Mr. Robinson, rammed a van into a congregation of Muslims leaving a mosque in north London in January.”
In reality, there was no “inspiration” from Robinson, who never called for any attacks on mosques. The Times makes this connection based on a mass email that the perpetrator received, which itself did not call for or justify any violence. The Times rushes to connect Robinson to this incident, while it can never quite see the connection between Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” while killing people and the violent passages of the Qur’an.
“Tommy Robinson, Anti-Muslim Activist, Is Freed on Bail in U.K.,” by Palko Karasz, New York Times, August 1, 2018:
LONDON — Tommy Robinson, the jailed British far-right activist backed by the former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon but reviled by others who call him a violent purveyor of hate, was ordered to be freed on bail Wednesday, after challenging his conviction for contempt of court.
Mr. Robinson was arrested in May after he live-streamed a video from outside a criminal trial in Leeds, England, which had a news media blackout, revealing the defendants’ identities. He was sentenced to 13 months in prison for contempt of court, provoking an international outcry in far-right circles.
On Wednesday, the Court of Appeal ordered his release, pending a new hearing in his case. The court questioned the speed with which he had been tried and convicted, noting that it took five hours from the time of his arrest to a conviction.
Who is Tommy Robinson?
Anti-Muslim activist

Mr. Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, is the founder of the English Defense League, an anti-Islam and anti-immigration movement, known for violent street protests.
Born and raised in Luton, north of London, he worked at the town’s international airport but lost that job for assaulting an off-duty police officer. He was also arrested after being accused of inciting soccer violence, as a supporter of the Luton soccer club.
“Wherever he has gone in his career he organized demonstrations that have resulted in extreme violence,” said Joe Mulhall, a senior researcher at Hope Not Hate, a London-based organization that researches hate groups.
“His divisive, anti-Muslim rhetoric has resulted in acts of violence,” he added, the most extreme of which occurred when a man, inspired by Mr. Robinson, rammed a van into a congregation of Muslims leaving a mosque in north London in January….
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/tommy-robinson-freed-on-bail

Video: UK MEP Janice Atkinson — Tommy Robinson has struck fear in UK politicians



Video: UK MEP Janice Atkinson — Tommy Robinson has struck fear in UK politicians


[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVpNptP98QU&w=560&h=315]
I interview UK MEP Janice Atkinson. She discusses how the Free Tommy demos didn’t have much impact on parliament, but that Tommy Robinson has sparked fear into the politicians and has created a rapidly growing street movement in defense of freedom and human rights.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/video-uk-mep-janice-atkinson-tommy-robinson-has-struck-fear-in-uk-politicians

29 fires erupt as “Palestinian” arson jihad ‎continues to scorch southern Israel


 BY 

Arson has long been a weapon of the jihad: “‘Unleash Hell’: New Al Qaeda magazine describes in detail how to start huge forest fires across the U.S..with instructions on how to make ’ember bombs’” — Daily Mail, May 3, 2012
“29 fires erupt as Palestinian arson terrorism ‎continues to scorch western Negev,” by Nikki Guttman and Adi Hashmonai, Israel Hayom, August 1, 2018:
Twenty-nine fires erupted in Israeli communities ‎near the Gaza Strip border Tuesday, as Palestinian ‎arson terrorism continued to wreak havoc near the ‎volatile frontier. ‎
One incendiary balloon sent over the Gaza border ‎landed on a parked vehicle in the Eshkol Regional ‎Council, damaging its roof. No injuries were ‎reported in the incident.‎
Sdot Negev Regional Council head Tamir Idan leveled ‎harsh criticism at the government over what he ‎called its tolerance of the situation. ‎
‎”Frankly, I’m very concerned by the government’s ‎inaction. Especially given the promises made to us ‎during their [ministers’] recent meetings with the ‎local council heads. ‎
‎”This type of prolonged inaction is perceived by the ‎other side as a serious weakness. Hamas continues to ‎dictate reality on the ground and we keep being ‎dragged behind it,” he said.‎
Various ministers visited the Gaza-vicinity ‎communities over the past few weeks, each saying ‎that Israel will not tolerate arson terrorism as the ‎norm near the border. ‎
Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who visited ‎Kibbutz Or Haner, some 3.7 kilometers (2.3 ‎miles) from ‎Gaza, last week, warned that ‎”if we have Color Red [rocket alerts] ‎here, Gaza will turn deep ‎red too.” ‎
‎”We would prefer not to be dragged into war, and ‎‎we’re doing everything we can to avoid a large ‎‎operation, but the ball is not in our court. I ‎‎highly recommend Hamas be wise about it,” Lieberman ‎said. ‎
Idan demanded the government “live up to its ‎statements that kite and balloon terrorism would be ‎treated like rocket fire.”‎…

Pakistan: Anti-blasphemy party whose leader has vowed to nuke the Netherlands does well in elections


Pakistan: Anti-blasphemy party whose leader has vowed to nuke the Netherlands does well in elections

 BY 

Jihad Watch reported on July 8 that hundreds of candidates in the Pakistani elections were backed by jihad terror groups and supporters of blasphemy laws, and on July 11 that Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP)’s leader Khadim Hussain Rizvi said: “If they give me the atom bomb I would remove Holland from the face of the earth before they can hold a competition of caricatures… I will wipe them off the face of this earth.” Pakistan also allowed three candidates on the UN terror watch to run in elections.
Rizvi’s party did well in the elections:
A relatively new anti-blasphemy party whose leader has reportedly vowed to nuke the Netherlands should he ever come to power did surprisingly well in Pakistan’s elections last week.
This could lead to more severe persecution for Christians who already live a precarious existence because of Islamic blasphemy laws in Pakistan. A report by Christian watchdog Open Doors USAstates:
Much of the Christian persecution in Pakistan comes from radical Islamic groups that flourish and expand under the favor of political parties, the army and the government…these radical Islamic groups run thousands of madrassas, Islamic education centers where youth are taught and encouraged to persecute religious minorities like Christians.
Lies about Christians committing blasphemy are the norm in Pakistan; blasphemy laws are used for settling personal scores and often “those who accuse Christians of blasphemy take the punishment for the ‘crime’ into their own hands, leading to beatings and killings.”
“Pakistan election sees rise of anti-blasphemy party,” AFP, July 31, 2018:
A relatively new anti-blasphemy party whose leader has reportedly vowed to nuke the Netherlands should he ever come to power did surprisingly well in Pakistan’s elections last week, which were tainted by the rise of extremist groups.
Islamic fundamentalist parties fielded more than 1,500 candidates in Pakistan’s provincial and national elections that were won by cricket hero turned politician Imran Khan.
Extremists were a major talking point going into the contest with politicians, including Khan, accused of pandering to their vote base by trumpeting hardline issues such as blasphemy.
Here AFP looks at how the main extremist parties fared during Wednesday’s polls.
– Anti-blasphemy party –
The performance of Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP), led by radical preacher Khadim Hussain Rizvi, will worry mainstream politicians and human rights activists the most.
The group, founded in 2015, entered the national consciousness last year when it blockaded the capital Islamabad for several weeks calling for stricter enforcement of Pakistan’s controversial blasphemy laws.
It wants the automatic death penalty for anyone deemed to have insulted Islam or the Prophet Muhammad……
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/pakistan-anti-blasphemy-party-whose-leader-has-vowed-to-nuke-the-netherlands-does-well-in-elections

Questions for the traditionalists

When I say that we cannot physically see or meet someone  saved with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and in invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water, this simple observation could by acknowledged by the website Whispers of Restoration.
They could let me know if they agree or not. Is this true or do they think this is false ?
Then when I say that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) cannot be practical exceptions, to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), since they do not exist in our reality, they are not physically visible does the editor at Whispers of Restoration agree with me? Is this also his or her view?
Whispers of Restoration could respond since this is an objective question or are they waiting for the answer from someone important.
When I say that in Vatican Council II,LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to invisible people in 2018, and they do not exist in our reality, does this make sense  for the team at this website? Am I being rational for them?
They could let me know.
So are there known non Catholics saved outside the Church where the true Church of Christ allegedly subsists ?(LG 8)
Are there known Catholics saved outside the Church with elements of sanctification and truth?(LG 8)
Does the Church say that someone in the past, after the Resurrection of Jesus, personally saw a non Catholic or Catholic in Heaven without the baptism of water and Catholic faith? 
These are simple questions for the editor/ editors of Whispers of Restoration, 1Peter5,Remnant, Catholic Family News and the other traditionalists.-Lionel Andrades