This is also the mistake Louie Verrecchio makes.
Then there is the Angelus Conference in October at which Bishop Bernard Fellay will be present.The speakers and participants, like at previous conferences, will assume LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.They would allegedly know of people saved outside the Church in the present times.
A hypothetical person is an exception to the dogma EENS or someone in the past who allegedly went to Heaven without the baptism of water, is an exception to all needing to be members of the Church in 2018.Possibilities of salvation outside the Church, known only to God, are concrete cases in the present times ?.
This is the mistake Louie Verrecchio also makes.
After so many blog posts on this subject he cannot think straight on this subject.
But it is not just his fault. Where can he go for help?
I can affirm BOD, BOB and I.I, like Louie and the SSPX, but they refer to physically visible people.I don't. Without allegedly knowing physically visible people saved outside the Church, there cannot be an exceptions to EENS in the present times. For the 'magisterium' too EENS has exceptions.
But over the centuries the popes did not consider BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to known people saved in the present times. How could they refer to known people in the present times, when there are no such people?
So when Louie and the SSPX bishops and priests read the Catechism of Pope Pius X they interpret BOD,BOB and I.I as objective people saved outside the Church.So there are exceptions for them as there were exceptions for Fr. Francois Laisney.
TRADITIONALISTS CONTRADICT THE CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X
TRADITIONALISTS CONTRADICT THE CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X
The Catechism of Pope Pius X becomes a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return and there being no salvation outside the Church for non Christians.BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions.This would be heresy in the 16th century. But it is the official position today of the SSPX and Louie Verrecchio.
TRADITIONALISTS REJECT THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
Imagine this -Louie Verrecchio and the SSPX are contradicting the Syllabus and there is no denial from them.
I have mentioned this before. The alleged traditionalists are contradicting the Syllabus by using an irrational premise in the interpretation of BOD, BOB and I.I.
TRADITIONALISTS REJECT THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
Imagine this -Louie Verrecchio and the SSPX are contradicting the Syllabus and there is no denial from them.
I have mentioned this before. The alleged traditionalists are contradicting the Syllabus by using an irrational premise in the interpretation of BOD, BOB and I.I.
The Catechism of Pope Pius X mentions invincible ignorance for example.This is visible for them invincible ignorance cases(otherwise how could they be exceptions to EENS) and so there is a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century.For the Jesuits in the Middle Ages there were no exceptions.
THEY AFFIRM THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE WITH HERESY
THEY AFFIRM THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE WITH HERESY
Then Louie and the SSPX affirm the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which says everyone does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.This is heresy again.
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member- Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member- Letter of the Holy Office 1949
How can Louie Verrecchio and the SSPX call themselves traditionalists?-Lionel Andrades
Posts
