Sunday, August 12, 2018
Repost : Muslims have to begin and end their prayers to God with the name of Mohammad whom the Catholic Church considers lost for all eternity since he died without 'faith and baptism'(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II)
DECEMBER 12, 2017
Muslims have to begin and end their prayers to God with the name of Mohammad whom the Catholic Church considers lost for all eternity since he died without 'faith and baptism'(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II)
Muslims during the birthday celebrations of the prophet Mohammad(Milad ul Nabi) in Muslims countries sing religious songs(Naats) in praise of Mohammad.They put other Muslims in prison,who believe in Allah, but do not accept Mohammad as the last prophet of God.They have to begin and end their prayers to God with the name of Mohammad whom the Catholic Church considers lost for all eternity since he died without 'faith and baptism'(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II) 1
-Lionel Andrades
1.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/sspx-cannot-accept-vatican-council-ii.html
-Lionel Andrades
1.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/sspx-cannot-accept-vatican-council-ii.html
Repost : No contradiction or correction from Roberto dei Mattei
DECEMBER 14, 2017
No contradiction or correction from Roberto dei Mattei
There is no contradiction or correction from Roberto dei Mattei.I e-mailed him at Correspondenza Romano with this blog post. 1
I have said that Mattei will not support Feeneyiteextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is confirmed that he will not.
He may say that the Church has rejected Feeneyite EENS and so he must not support it but then the Church has also accepted Vatican Councl II(Cushingite) and he criticizes Vatican Council II.
When he refers to outside the Church there is no salvation he is referring to Cushingite EENS,in which invisible for him baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions in the present times to traditional EENS.
He may say that the Church has rejected Feeneyite EENS and so he must not support it but then the Church has also accepted Vatican Councl II(Cushingite) and he criticizes Vatican Council II.
When he refers to outside the Church there is no salvation he is referring to Cushingite EENS,in which invisible for him baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions in the present times to traditional EENS.
This is the error of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre which is not denied by the SSPX.
I informed him that I affirm EENS and Vatican Council II Feeneyite, and he has nothing to say.He does not think that I am in heresy? Am I orthodox for him?
He knows if he affirms Feeneyite Vatican Council II(LG 16-refers to hypothetical cases only) and Feeneyite EENS( BOD, BOB and I.I are not visible and known people) then he would be saying in public that all Jews and Muslims need to enter the Church with no known exceptions in 2017 to avoid Hell.
Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church.
But he supports the FSSP and other priests when they offer the Tridentine Rite Mass with the new ecclesiology based on visible for them BOD, BOB and I.I.For them there are known people saved outside the Church.Since there are known people saved outside the Church, who are practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church is rejected.
He rejects the ecclesiology of St.Robert Bellarmine who did not state that there were personally known or physically visible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I.Yet this is the inference of Roberto dei Mattei and he does not deny this.
His interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingite theology results in heresy which he shares with the two popes.
I have been saying this for the last few years and he does not comment on this issue which is uncomfortable for him.
Just as believes that what is known only to God can be known also to man(BOD is visible), Pope Francis,Pope Benedict and Cardinal Muller believe that they can judge Catholics as not being in mortal sin in spite of the objective evidence to the contrary.
Cardinal Kasper has said that the controversy over Amoris Laetitia is over.A few years back he said that if every one can accept the new ecclesiology why cannot they also accept the Eucharist being given to the divorced and remarried.
Roberto dei Mattei could make a difference if announces that there are no physically visible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I in 2017 and he cannot judge and conclude that someone outside the Church, whom he knows, will be saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.Neither can he conclude that there can be known people, saved outside the Church and they are in Heaven but visible on earth to be exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.-Lionel Andrades
1.
DECEMBER 12, 2017
Neither is Roberto dei Mattei nor Maike Hickson willing to affirm the old ecclesiology of the Church with Feeneyite EENS and with such a big doctrinal and theological divide among us they are talking about the pope being in heresy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/neither-is-roberto-dei-mattei-not-maike.html
Repost : The traditionalists in general have made an error.They have made a major error in theology and doctrine
DECEMBER 15, 2017
The traditionalists in general have made an error.They have made a major error in theology and doctrine
The traditionalists in general have made an error.They have made a major error in theology and doctrine.
For Roberto dei Mattei for example invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
So he will not affirm Feeneyite EENS.
So Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition for him.If he affirmed Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with Tradition.
He would be saying Lumen Gentium 16(LG 16) etc are not physically visible cases.SO they do not contradict the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
Vatican Council II does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.
-Lionel AndradesDECEMBER 14, 2017
Repost : Pledge of Fidelity Signatories and I interpret the Nicene Creed differently
DECEMBER 15, 2017
Pledge of Fidelity Signatories and I interpret the Nicene Creed differently
I interpret the Nicene Creed without the irrationality. For me there is no irrational premise so it remains, 'I believe in one baptism'.It is the baptism of water which is visible and repeatable.The (Pledge of Fidelity) signatories interpret the Nicene Creed with the irrational premise(' I believe in three or more known baptisms they are desire, blood and invincible ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.) 1
1
DECEMBER 15, 2017
Repost : Pledge of Fidelity signatories reject de fide teachings of the Catholic Church and support a new irrational theology
DECEMBER 15, 2017
Pledge of Fidelity signatories reject de fide teachings of the Catholic Church and support a new irrational theology
Pledge of Fidelity
FAITHFUL TO TRUE DOCTRINE, NOT ERRING PASTORS
The number of innocent children killed by abortion during the last century is greater than that of all the human beings who have died in all the wars in recorded history. The last fifty years have witnessed a continual escalation in attacks on the structure of the family as designed and willed by God, which provides the best environment for human flourishing, and, especially, for the education and formation of children. Divorce, contraception, acceptance of homosexual acts and unions, and the spread of “gender ideology” have all done immeasurable damage to the family, and its most vulnerable members.
Over the last fifty years the pro-life and pro-family movement has grown in both size and scope in order to confront these grave evils, which threaten both the temporal and eternal good of mankind. Our movement comprises men and women of good will from a wide variety of religious backgrounds. We are brought together in our defence of the family, and of the most vulnerable of our brothers and sisters, through obedience to the natural law, which is written on all our hearts (cf. Rm 2:15). However, throughout this last half century the pro-life and pro-family movement has relied in a particular way on the immutable teaching of the Catholic Church, which affirms the moral law with the greatest clarity.
It is therefore with great sorrow that during recent years we have witnessed doctrinal and moral clarity, on issues relating to the protection of human life and the family, increasingly being replaced by ambiguity, and even by doctrines directly contrary to the teaching of Christ and the precepts of the natural law.
Lionel : The signatories in general have made an error.They have made a major error in theology and doctrine. For example invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So they will not affirm Feeneyite EENS.
Without Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with Tradition.Since when BOD, BOB and I.I are considered exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, then it means that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church. These are known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I for them to be exceptions.Invisible people cannot be exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Church with no known exception for salvation in the present times(2017).
With Feeneyite EENS it would mean that the signatories do not consider BOD, BOB and I.I as being exceptions to EENS. They are not exceptions since obviously they refer to hypothetical cases.They cannot be known people saved outside the Church.So if the signatories affirmed Feeneyite EENS then they would be saying that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
But they do not affirm Feeneyite EENS. While I do so as a Catholic.
So they are not faithful to the dogma EENS as it was know to the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century, they use a new and irrational theology(Cushingism) and they interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past ecclesiology when for me it is not a rupture.
So they are not faithful to the past teachings of the Church and have created new doctrines in salvation theology and the present two popes do the same.
So they are not affirming Feeneyite EENS and they are correcting Pope Francis and the Vatican Curia on doctrine.
_________________________________________
Lionel:None of them affirm Feeneyite EENS.So they support the new ecclesiology. They affirm the new theology based on visible for them BOD, BOB and I.I.
So Cardinal Walter Kasper said before the Synod in an interview that if the Church could accept the new ecclesiology then they could also accept Holy Communion being given at Mass to the divorced and remarried.
I have been writing about this since 2015 and none of the signatories to the various appeals or the dubbia cardinals have responded. Since they do not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS.
_______________________________
The disorder within the Church is increasing, as witnessed by a letter recently sent to Pope Francis by a prominent theologian, which, the author stated, was prompted by “turmoil within the Church today, a chaos and an uncertainty that I felt Pope Francis had himself caused.” 1
Lionel: Pope Francis too wants to remain politically correct with the Left,like the signatories and dubbia cardinals, and so he will not affirm Feeneyite EENS. Invisible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So EENs for him, and Pope Benedict is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Pope Benedict confirmed this in March 2016(Avvenire) and none of the signatories objected.
So EENs for him, and Pope Benedict is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Pope Benedict confirmed this in March 2016(Avvenire) and none of the signatories objected.
_________________________________
As Catholic pro-life and pro-family leaders, we are obliged to highlight numerous additional statements and actions, which have had a particularly damaging impact on our work for the protection of unborn children and the family in recent years. Representative examples include:
- statements and actions which contradict the Church’s teaching on the intrinsic evil of contraceptive acts 2;
- statements and actions which contradict the Church’s teaching on the nature of marriage and the intrinsic evil of sexual acts outside the union of marriage 3;
- the approval of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, which effectively call for member states to achieve universal access to abortion, contraception and sex education by 2030 4;
- the approach adopted towards sex education, particularly in chapter 7 of Amoris Laetitia and in The Meeting Point programme produced by the Pontifical Council for the Family 5.
As leaders within the pro-life and pro-family movement, or leaders of lay movements concerned with the defence and diffusion of Catholic moral and social teaching, we have witnessed first-hand the harm and confusion caused by such teaching and actions. In order to fulfil our responsibilities to those whom we have pledged to protect, in particular unborn children and those made especially vulnerable by the breakdown of the family, we must provide clarity on our position on these issues. We must also provide leadership to those within our movement who look to us for guidance and advice.
Lionel: The Director of the Human Life International, Rome,Fr. Francesco Giordano will not affirm Feeneyite EENS in public probably he fears he he could be suspended as a priest. So he teaches a semester at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum), Rome in which invisible for him cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries. He probaby has to do this to keep his teaching career. What he teaches is false.It is objectively wrong. It is a deception.Yet his personal interests over ride speaking the truth of the faith and affirming traditional doctrines and theology. If he can violate the Principle of Non Contradiction, then why should he expect mothers not to abort or use contraceptives?. Even they could rationalize.He is not a signatory here.
Similarly the Editor and Co founder ofLifesitesNews, John Henry Weston,one of the signatories here will not affirm Feeneyite EENS.Since it will financially affect his business and earnings. Lifesites could be accused of being anti-Semitic, racist etc. So why are the same allowances also not made for Pope Francis ? He could be doing what he does to protect himself and the Vatican ?
____________________________
For this reason, we wish to make clear our unchanging adherence to the fundamental moral positions outlined below:
- there exist certain acts which are intrinsically evil and which it is always forbidden to commit 6;
- the direct killing of an innocent human being is always gravely immoral; consequently, abortion, euthanasia and assisted suicide are intrinsically evil acts 7;
- marriage is the exclusive and indissoluble union of one man and one woman; all sexual acts outside of marriage, including in all forms of non-marital union, are intrinsically evil and gravely injurious to individuals and to society 8;
- adultery is a grave sin, and those who live in adultery cannot be admitted to the sacraments of Penance and Holy Communion, until such time as they repent and amend their lives 9;
- parents are the primary educators of their children, and the provision of sex education must be undertaken by parents or, in certain circumstances, “in educational centres chosen and controlled by them”10;
- the separation of the procreative and unitive ends of the sexual act by contraceptive methods is intrinsically evil and has devastating consequences for the family, for society and for the Church 11;
- methods of artificial reproduction are gravely immoral as they separate procreation from the sexual act and, in the great majority of cases, lead directly to the destruction of human life in its earliest stages 12;
- there are only two sexes, male and female, each of which possesses the complementary characteristics and differences that are proper to them 13;
- homosexual acts are intrinsically evil, and no form of union between persons of the same sex can be approved in any way 14.
Lionel: Morally it is wrong not to affirm Feeneyite EENS and pretend that there are visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is deception and a lie.The lie is being maintained even after the signatories know about it.
_____________________
As Catholic pro-life and pro-family leaders we must remain faithful to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who has entrusted the deposit of faith to his Church.
Lionel: To assume unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS is not the deposit of the faith. It is an innovation in the Church. Where are the practical exceptions to EENS in 2017 for the signatories?
The signatories violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and remain politically correct on the salvation issue.Then they ask the pope not to remain politically correct with the Left on the moral issue.
___________________
We “are obliged to yield to God the revealer full submission of intellect and will by faith.”15 We fully assent to all those things “which are contained in the word of God as found in Scripture and Tradition, and which are proposed by the Church as matters to be believed as divinely revealed, whether by her solemn judgment or in her ordinary and universal magisterium.”16
Lionel: There is a rupture between faith and reason when it is assumed unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known exceptions to EENS, as it was interpreted by the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.
__________________________
We pledge our full obedience to the hierarchy of the Catholic Church in the legitimate exercise of its authority.
Lionel:When the hierarchy of the Catholic Church, the present two popes, interpret hypothetical cases as being known examples of salvation outside the Church why is this not corrected ? The signatories and the liberal German bishops are on the same side on the salvation issue.
_________________________
However, nothing will ever persuade us, or compel us, to abandon or contradict any article of the Catholic faith or any truth definitively established.
Lionel: I interpret all magisterial documents without the irrational premise i.e invisible people are visible.The signatories and the hierarchy do not do so.
I affirm EENS(Feeneyite) and the signatories affirm EENS (Cushingite)-
I affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise. The signatories interpret it with the false premise.
I interpret the Nicene Creed without the irrationality. For me there is no irrational premise so it remains, 'I believe in one baptism'.It is the baptism of water which is visible and repeatable.The signatories interpret the Nicene Creed with the irrational premise(' I believe in three or more known baptisms they are desire, blood and invincible ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.)
For me the signatories in general are irrational, non traditional and heretical.If there are any exceptions among them they have have not expressed themself in public on this issue.None of them have been able to deny what I have written explaining themself with theology and doctrine.
Basically I am saying that invisible people cannot be visible at the same time. They disagree with me.Their theology is based upon this irrationality(people saved in Heaven are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS on earth).For me this cannot be the deposit of the faith.
__________________________
If there is any conflict between the words and acts of any member of the hierarchy, even the pope, and the doctrine that the Church has always taught, we will remain faithful to the perennial teaching of the Church.
Lionel: The two popes reject Feeneyite EENs. They affirm EENS with visible for them BOD, BOB and I.I which I call Cushingite EENS.
The two popes reject Feeneyite Vatican Council II and accept the irrational Cushingite Vatican Council II.
In general they use the false premise to interpret magisterial documents and this is accepted by the signatories. Since they do the same.
___________________________
If we were to depart from the Catholic faith, we would depart from Jesus Christ, to Whom we wish to be united for all eternity.
Lionel: Agreed.
We, the undersigned, pledge that we will continue to teach and propagate the above moral principles, and every other authentic teaching of the Catholic Church, and will never, for any reason, depart from them.
Lionel: I affirm the moral principles which you support and I am waiting for you to do the same on the salvation principles of the Church which I affirm as a good Catholic.-Lionel Andrades
__________________
12th December, 2017
Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe
Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe
https://www.fidelitypledge.com/
SIGNATORIES
Bernard Antony
President of Chrétienté-Solidarité (France)
Dame Colleen Bayer, DSG
Founding Director of Family Life International NZ (New Zealand)
Judie Brown
President of American Life League (United States)
Patrick Buckley
Director of European Life Network (Ireland)
Georges Buscemi
President of Campagne Quebec Vie (Canada)
Giorgio Celsi
President of Associazione “Ora et Labora in Difesa della Vita” (Italy)
Dr. Anca-Maria Cernea, MD
Ioan Barbus Foundation (Romania)
Greg Clovis
Director of Family Life International UK (United Kingdom)
Rev. Linus F. Clovis
Spiritual Director of Family Life International St Lucia (St Lucia)
Virginia Coda Nunziante
President of Associazione Famiglia Domani (Italy)
Modesto Fernandez
President of Droit de Naître (France)
Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D.
Director of the Institute for Marital Healing (United States)
Mathias von Gersdorff
Director of Aktion Kinder in Gefahr (Germany)
Corrado Gnerre
National Director of Il Cammino dei Tre Sentieri (Italy)
Doug Grane
Chief Executive of Serviam (United States)
Michael Hichborn
President of the Lepanto Institute (United States)
Jason Jones
Founder of I am Whole Life
Founder of Movie to Movement (United States)
John Lacken
Founder of Legio Sanctae Familiae
Secretary of the Lumen Fidei Institute (Ireland)
François Legrier
President of Mouvement Catholique des Familles (France)
Vittorio Lodolo D’Oria
President of Famiglie Numerose Cattoliche (Italy)
Samuele Maniscalco
Director of Generazione Voglio Vivere (Italy)
Christine de Marcellus Vollmer
President of Asociacion Provida de Venezuela (PROVIVE)
President of Alianza Latinoamericana para la Familia (ALAFA)
President of Alive to the World, Education in Integrity (Venezuela)
Roberto de Mattei
President of Fondazione Lepanto (Italy)
Jean-Pierre Maugendre
President of Renaissance Catholique (France)
Thomas McKenna
President of Catholic Action for Faith and Family (United States)
Anthony Murphy
Director of Catholic Voice (Ireland)
Marisa Orecchia
President of Federvita Piemonte (Italy)
Philippe Piloquet
President of SOS Tout-petits (France)
Philippe Schepens M.D.
Secretary-General of the World Federation of Doctors Who Respect Human Life (Belgium)
John Smeaton
Chief Executive of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (United Kingdom)
Molly Smith
President of Bringing America Back to Life
Executive Director of Cleveland Right to Life (United States)
Guillaume de Thieulloy
Director of Le Salon Beige (France)
Yves Tillard
President of Action Familiale et Scolaire (France)
Dr. Thomas Ward
President of the National Association of Catholic Families (United Kingdom)
John-Henry Westen
Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief of LifeSiteNews (Canada)
Mercedes Arzú Wilson
Founder and President of Family of the Americas Foundation (Nicaragua)
Diego Zoia
Director of SOS Ragazzi (Italy)
http://voxcantor.blogspot.it/2017/12/worlds-leading-pro-life-leaders-accuse.html
________________________________________
________________________________________
DECEMBER 15, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
