To remain politically correct with the Left, LifeSites' Catholics edition has compromised on the interpretation of Vatican Council II and salvation doctrine.So the traditional teachings of the Church on mission,ecumenism, inter faith marriage etc have been rejected.

Lifesites News in its reports and press meetings at the Vatican do not support Catholic theology and doctrine but instead affirm new and false doctrines approved by the Left.

 INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II INCORRECTLY
1.They still interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

MIXED UP CHRISTOLOGY WITH ECCLESIOCENTRISM ECCLESIOLOGY

2.With reference to the Synod Working Paper, which rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, LifeSite News did not quote Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation and that Catholics are the new people of God (Nostra Aetate 2, Vatican Council II).This is ecclesiocentrism.Anonymous Coetus responded with Chrstology and LifeSites overlooked it.

UNAWARE OF THE ERROR IN THE NEW THEOLOGY

3.When exclusive salvation was rejected by the Synod in its Working Paper , Life Sites News quoted COETUS International, which referred to Dominus Iesus 14 and 16.It is is Christological and does not affirm ecclesiocentrism in the text.Most of Dominus Iesus is Christological. Some passages refer to a vague ecclesiocentrism.Even Cardinal Hummes could cite Dominus Iesus  14 and 16 and say the non Catholics in the Amazon are saved by Christ in their primitive religion.
 ERROR OF CDF IGNORED SHOWS UP IN AMAZON COVERAGE

4.For the Catholics at the St. Benedict Center, N.H there are no practical exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I or LG 8 etc , in Vatican Council II, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no literal exceptions. This is common sense.It is something obvious to all people and not just Catholics.However the SBC are legally not Catholic for the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF). For the CDF, cases of being saved in invincible ignorance (CCC 847-848) are practical exceptions to traditional EENS as it was interpreted for example in the 16th century.
LifeSite News supports the CDF and the Left on this issue.So now when the Amazon Working Paper rejects exclusive salvation they do not know how to respond. Diane Monatagne at the Vatican Press briefing referred to the heresy of the Working Paper without mentioning what exactly was the heresy, supported by magisterial documents.
This is a rupture with the popes and saints on Baptism of desire(BOD),Baptism of Blood (BOB) and Invincible ignorance(I.I) and EENS. For the popes BOD, BOB and I.I referred to only hypothetical cases. They could not be anything else.So when they affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS, BOD, BOB and I.I were not exceptions.

To remain politically correct with the Left, LifeSites' Catholics edition has compromised on the interpretation of Vatican Council II and salvation doctrine.So the traditional teachings of the Church on mission,ecumenism, inter faith marriage etc have been rejected.-Lionel Andrades

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/recent-rome-trip-was-largest-lifesite-team-international-effort-to-date