Thursday, July 9, 2020

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano must talk about the secret false premise used to interpret Vatican Council II.


Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano must talk about the secret false premise used to interpret Vatican Council II. Without this common irrationality the Council , in a surprise, does not contradict exclusive salvation in the Church. So the Latin Mass would no more be an issue. Since the whole Church, theologically once again, would be traditional on extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
Even the German bishops would have to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise.
It would be a blessing for the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) and the Franciscans of the Immaculate (F.I) who could affirm outside the Church there is no salvation and there being no exceptions. This was the Doctrinal position of the SSPX General Chapter Statement.
Presently only on this blog this error is corrected.The missing link, the discovery of what precisely causes the hermeneutic of rupture and how it can be avoided, has been discovered.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) keeps this information secret.
Without the false premise there is no 'development of doctrine'.

The CDF Secretaries and the Diocese of Manchester, USA have asked Brother Andre Marie MICM. Prior at the St.Benedict Centet, N.H, USA to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church(847-848) with the false premise. In this way CCC 847-848 becomes an objective example of salvation outside the Catholic Church and an exception to Feeneyite EENS, the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc.
Presently Catholics have lost their identity as they have to interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechisms, the Creeds and other magisterial documents with the false premise.
Cardinal Ratzinger wrote Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus  with the false premise.Also the Balamand Declaration and the Joint Statement on Justification with the Lutherans was also possible theologically because of the false premise.Pope justified his Abu Dhabi Statement with Vatican Council II - interpreted with the false premise.
 The International Theological Commission(ITC) in two of its papers have officially used the false premise and so it proposes a theology of religions which was condemned by Pope John Paul II ( CDF, Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis sj  2001).
Since the time of Fr. Leonard Feeney (1965) the St. Benedict Centers have been interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise.
On the website Catholicism.org they have been promoting articles and books written with the false premise, like those of Amerio Romano and Roberto dei Mattei.Brother Andre Marie has reviewed conferences organsied by Michael Matt at which Vatican Council II without the false premise was not affirmed.The Angelus, Lepanto and Lake Garda conferences were held with the same mistake.No corrections are being announced.
The traditionalists were intepreting Vatican Council II with the false premise and there still is no acknowledgement of the error on Catholicism.org and other traditionalist blogs when this is pointed out.
It is the same with the liberals. The School of Theology in the diocese of Porta Santa Rufina, Roma is named after Cardinal Tisserant. The French cardinal was known to Pope Paul VI. Paul Paul VI and the cardinal chose to interpret Vatican Council with the false premise instead of without it.
So the School of Theology and the School for Catchetics in this diocese under Bishop Gino Reali near the Fiumicino airport, interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition (EENS etc).
Archbishop Vigano, a Lefbvrist, himself interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms with the false premise, like the other Lefbvrists who follow the error of Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops.
The archbishop's theology and doctrine being Cushingite is flawed. He did not correct himself.Instead he would criticize Medugorje.-Lionel Andrades






JULY 8, 2020





Pope Benedict made a mistake. We have discovered the MISSING LINK. We now know how the hermeneutic of rupture emerges











No comments: