The SSPX communiqué indicates they are willing to accept a Vatican Council II in accord with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and traditional values arising from this doctrinal position.
Cardinal Sean O’Malley, Archbishop of Boston and personnel at his office will not answer two basic questions of the Catholic Faith. Their Vicar Generals, Catechetical Office and Office of Communications will not respond to these two questions.
If they answered those two questions then the Archbishop’s position on a traditional Vatican Council II would be the same as the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX). They would be supporting the SSPX by saying Vatican Council II is a traditional document with traditional values on ecclesiology etc.
Similarly a priest of the Archdiocese of Washington is not answering these two questions on his blog.
The Archdiocese of Boston and Washington will not support the SSPX and instead will assume that Vatican Council II is a non traditional, irrational document and with no citations from the Council to support the liberal interpretations of the dioceses of Boston and Washington.
Meanwhile the Vatican Curia will also not say that Vatican Council II is a traditional document but instead will claim, irrationally, that we know the dead-saved (LG 16) and the dead-saved (LG 16) contradict Ad Gentes 7 (all need Catholic Faith) . So Vatican Council II is contradictory irrational document and the SSPX has to accept this version for canonical status.
-Lionel Andrades
__________________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment