The Roman Forum Conference beginning on June 30,2014 will review Vatican Council II using the irrational right hand side column and then they will reject Vatican Council II.
If they used the left hand side column in the interpretation of Vatican Council II the interpretation would be rational and the Council would not be a break with the past.
The interpretation with the left or right hand side column decides if there is a hermeneutic of continuity or rupture. This is the missing link which makes Vatican Council II traditional or heretical.
We have found the missing link 1.The Roman Forum could discuss it.-L.A
LEFT HAND SIDE COLUMN - RIGHT HAND SIDE COLUMN
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
implicit or explicit for us.
hypothetical or known in reality.
invisible or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle) or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective
So one can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches. There are known exceptions in 2014 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Cathlic Church. The dead- saved are visible.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
Most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.
So the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance was never ever an exception to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, unless one is using the right hand side column.There were and are no known exceptions.
In 2014 the Padre Pio Prayer groups, the Neo Catechumenal Way, Charismatic Renewal, all the religious communities and most of the Diocesan priests, the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX), Archbishop Gerhard Muller, Archbishop Augustine Di Noi, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J, Monsignor Guido Pozzo and the Vatican Council for the Clergy are using the irrational column in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston 1949.- Lionel Andrades
1.
Have we learnt anything from the last 70 plus years ?- The Roman Forum has not
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/have-we-learnt-anything-from-last-70.html#links
Young Catholics will be taught objective error at the Roman Forum meeting this month http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/young-catholics-will-be-taught.html#links
________________________________________________
More nonsense on Rorate Caeili
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/more-nonsense-on-rorate-caeili.html#links
Archbishop Muller and the SSPX are both using the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise of being able to see people in Heaven
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/archbishop-muller-and-sspx-are-both.html#links
Archbishop Muller and the SSPX have compromised on the faith?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/archbishop-muller-and-sspx-have.html#links
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment