All the Cardinals and Bishops at the Synod on the family in their catechesis will use the irrational right hand column in the intepretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church

The pope in his catechesis today morning speaks of the necessity of the Church, the necessity  of belonging to the hierarchical church.However the hierarchical church uses an irrationality in the interpretation of magisterial documents including Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.The pope himself rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and  calls it triumphalism. This is heresy.

 

He also interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise which makes the Council a break with Tradition. This was not part of the hierarchical Catholic Church before 1949.

 

All the Cardinals and Bishops at the Synod on the Family this month, in their catechesis in Catholic families, will probably use the irrational  right hand column in the intepretation of of magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II .

 

The pope and the cardinals at the Synod  want the  Society of St.Pius X and the Franciscans of the Immaculate to interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand column (just as they do).The  left hand column is a rational choice which they ignore. The pope wants them to  interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past,  with Cushingism  and with the right hand column.

The hierarchical Church at this month's Synod on the Family will teach Catholics that   'God is not bound to the Sacraments'' for salvation (CCC 1257). The cardinals believe that this is a reference to a real, visible exception.This is irrational.The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus instead  tells us that God has chosen to make salvation limited to the Sacraments.Can ghosts be exceptions for the cardinals ?

 

The Hierarchical Church considers CCC 1258-60 as  exceptions to all needing the baptism of water.They are substitutes for the baptism of water.Even when we do not know any such case in real life(2014) they are substitutes.

 

No  magisterial text before the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 claims that there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus yet this error is accepted and taught by the cardinals who will attend the Synod.

All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:

LEFT HAND SIDE COLUMN      or RIGHT HAND COLUMN

 

implicit                                                             or explicit for us.
hypothetical                                                     or known in reality.
invisible                                                           or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle)                                        or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective                                                         or objective.
So families, parents, cathechists,can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts itself. LG 16 ( invincible ignorance is an exception to all needing to convert) is contradicted by Ad Gentes 7, which says all need to convert into the Catholic Church.

If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict itself. LG 16 does not contradict AG 7 and LG 14.

The cardinals and the pope could use the left hand side column but they do not.

In family catechesis the irrational concept of VISIBLE exceptions is used in general by the cardinals who will participate in the Synod.The dead are visible.
Then they say that every one needs to enter the Catholic Church except for those in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. In other words these cases are VISIBLE to us in real life.So they are exceptions. We know cases in 2014 saved with the baptism of desire etc .The cardinals can name them! So they become exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Then the cardinals and bishops  say every person does not need to enter the Church and all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church. What has all who are saved, are saved through Jesus and the Church, have to do with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? Again it is inferred subtly that there are known cases saved without the baptism of water in other religions. They are VISIBLE to us . So all do not need to enter the Church for salvation.

Whenever someone says there are exceptions he is implying that there are VISIBLE exceptions.
They say Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for denying the baptism of desire. In other words, he would not accept a VISIBLE baptism of desire.

The cardinals and bishop say, along with the political left, that  Nostra Aetate 2 is a revolution in the Catholic Church since it contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. A person can be saved without the baptism of water and with ' a ray of the Truth' . In other words ' a ray of the Truth' is a VISIBLE exception.If it was not VISIBLE it would obviously not be an exception.

Similarly for them Unitatis Redintigratio 3,Vatican Council II  has changed the Catholic Church's teachings on ecumenism. Now a Protestant can be saved in 'imperfect communion with the Church'. For them,  these cases are VISIBLE in the present times, we can name some one saved in imperfect communion with the Church.

This is the doctrinal error with which the cardinals and bishops will come to the Synod.It is  an error  the popes overlook and consider being part of the hierarchical church.-Lionel Andrades

All this must be clarified by the SSPX before they sign a doctrinal preamble.This is major doctrinal error in the Catholic Church which the CDF keeps hidden

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-s.html#links