Wednesday, October 1, 2014

All this must be clarified by the SSPX before they sign a doctrinal preamble.This is major doctrinal error in the Catholic Church which the CDF keeps hidden



Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II while affirming that to obtain eternal salvation, 'it is not always necessary to  be incorporated into the Church actually as a member', but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.'(Letter of the Holy Office 1949) while the 2012 General Chapter Statement of the SSPX says the contrary,' 'we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation'. Every one needs to be incorporated in the Church for eternal salvation and there are no exceptions in 2014.
Cardinal Ladaria wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II with Cushingism ( the dead in Heaven are visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus) while he will reject  Feeneyism (LG 16 is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus).
He wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II with an irrationality, while a rational interpretation, an alternative, is available for them and he will not make it known.
The cardinal wants the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand column when the left hand column is a rational choice.1
He wants to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past, without the hermeneutic of continuity, but with  Cushingism,  the  irrational inference and with the right hand column.
He wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II as ambigous when without the irrationality the Council is not ambigous and affirms the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church.
There is a choice available for the SSPX. Vatican Council II is traditional on other religions and Christians communities when Cushingism is avoided in the interpretation and Feeneyism is used.

ARE THE DEAD VISIBLE AT THE CDF
The dead are not visible on earth. This is a fundamental principle the SSPX must remember.Ask the CDF to clarify this. Are the deceased now in Heaven visible on earth to us on earth for the CDF? Then how can there be exceptions in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus? And if there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II how can the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities have changed ? If there are no exceptions to the dogma how can Cardinal Ladaria on the ITC papers, put forward a theology of religion and a new ecclesiology ? If there is no known salvation outside the Church why should the ' old ecclesiology be rejected?Is not Vatican Council  II traditional?
How can the Letter of the Holy Office say 'be incorporated into the Church actually as a member'. Who can name an exception in 2014 ?
How can the Catechism of the Catholic Church in 1257 say 'God is not bound to the Sacraments'. Why does the Catechism mention this irrationality i.e why does it infer that there are known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation and so God is not limited to the Sacraments..Vatican Council II does not make this claim in its text.Catholics are  misled by the line 'God is not limited to the Sacraments' as referring to real, visible exceptions.This is irrational.The dogma tells us that God has chosen to make salvation limited to the Sacraments.

CCC 1257 WRONG INFERENCE


CCC 1257  implies that there is known salvation outside the Church and so God is not limited to the Sacraments.It implies that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (CCC 1258-1260) are visible in the flesh in 2014, for them to be exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. 
 Then CCC 1258,1259,1260 assumes that these hypothetical cases are known exceptions to CCC 1257 which also says 'the Church knows of no means to eternal beatitude other than the baptism of water'.It is common knowledge that we cannot see the dead who are in Heaven. CCC 1257-1260 infers that we can!There are defacto exceptions!?.
'God is not limited to the Sacraments' refers to an exception to CCC 1257 itself, which also says that the Church knows of no means to eternal beatitude other than the baptism of water.CCC 1257 contradicts itself.
CCC 1258-60 are also considered exceptions to all needing the baptism of water in other words they are substitutes for the baptism of water.Even when we do not know any such case in real life(2014) they are substitutes ?.The text says they are equivalent to the Sacrament of baptism.We cannot administer the baptism of desire or blood in 2014.These are implicit for us cases which the Catechism infers are explicit for us. Then it is postulated that these 'explicit for cases' are 'exceptions' to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. They are substitutes!?
This is false since we do not know any person in 2014 who is an exception/substitute  to all needing the baptism of water.

It is false since no magisterial text before the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 claims that there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

NO NEW REVELATION IN THE CHURCH


So how can it be said God is not limited to the sacraments when there is no New Revelation in the Catholic Church to contradict the thrice defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
It is wrong since it would contradict Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the Catechism itself (846,1257).
It contradicts St.Thomas Aquinas who says the baptism of water is always needed for salvation.He never claimed that there were known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
All this must be clarified by the SSPX before they sign a doctrinal preamble.This is major doctrinal error in the Catholic Church which the CDF is  keeping hidden.
-Lionel Andrades

 
1.

Ecclesiastical blackmail?




 

No comments: