Sunday, November 2, 2014

How does the Council contradict Fr.Leonard Feeney at LG 16,LG 8,NA 2,UR 3 etc?

You have not denied, that for you Lumen Gentium 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance) is an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. In other words these cases are visible and known for you to be exceptions. So you reject Vatican Council II here.
We agree on the dogma not having any exceptions according to the text of the dogma and because the baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.In principle and in fact the baptism of water is needed for all for salvation.It it is given to adults with Catholic Faith.
So far so good.
In theory if a person is saved with the baptism of desire ( with or without the baptism of water) this is a hypothetical case. So the baptism of desire, a hypothethical case cannot be known in 2014. It is irrelevant to the dogma when or if it happens.
So every one needs the baptism of water for salvation since practically we cannot know any exception. Practically there are no exceptions to the dogma mentioned in Vatican Council II. Since they would be hypothethical subjects.So how does the Council contradict Fr.Leonard Feeney at LG 16,LG 8,NA 2,UR 3 etc?
-Lionel Andrades
http://catholicism.org/cardinal-kaspers-error-on-god.html


Bad theology among traditionalists
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/


No comments: