Louie Verrecchio:
Let’s pick up our discussion of the Novus Ordowith one of the most important points raised in the previous post; namely, the suggestion often put forth by its defenders maintaining that the new Mass can neither be offensive to God, nor threaten to lead those who participate therein away from the Catholic faith, because:
The Church would never give such a rite to the faithful...
The Roman Pontiff, of course, plays an important role in safeguarding and facilitating that handing on of that which has been received, as do the bishops in union with him, but we’ll get to that in a moment.
Lionel:
The pontiffs since Pius XII did not protect the ecclesiology
associated with the Holy Mass.
associated with the Holy Mass.
__________________________
With the identifying marks described above being what they are, anything that is given to the children of the Church that deviates from this high standard of impeccability and purity quite simply cannot be attributed to her with respect to its origins.
Lionel:
The ecclesiology of the Mass was changed since the
magisterium from 1949 onwards clearly rejected the
magisterium of the past, on the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus.The error was placed
in Vatican Council II and now we have a
case of the contemporary popes
contradicting those from the past.
magisterium from 1949 onwards clearly rejected the
magisterium of the past, on the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus.The error was placed
in Vatican Council II and now we have a
case of the contemporary popes
contradicting those from the past.
___________________________
In the present case, the Supreme Pontiff has the solemn duty of passing along in all integrity that which has been handed down. The Mass is not his to craft according to his own desires, no matter how praiseworthy he believes them to be (e.g., placating heretics unto a false sense of unity)...
Lionel:
A defined dogma cannot be changed or discarded.
The Nicene Creed cannot be changed. Yet this
has been done. It is there before us.
The Nicene Creed cannot be changed. Yet this
has been done. It is there before us.
How can you interpret Lumen Gentium 16
with an irrationality. Yet this has been done.
with an irrationality. Yet this has been done.
____________________________
This is why so many good bishops acquiesced to the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, in spite of its “time bombs” as Michael Davies called them; they simply could not imagine that the pope would ever so neglect his duty as to unleash the tragedy that followed.
Lionel:
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael
Davies, Dietrich Von Hildebrand and
other traditionalists allowed the
Church to continue on a wrong theological way
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-michael.html
Davies, Dietrich Von Hildebrand and
other traditionalists allowed the
Church to continue on a wrong theological way
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-michael.html
This group of traditionalists instead
of correcting the factual error of
1949 consolidated it and did not
expose it http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/this-group-of-traditionalists-instead.html
of correcting the factual error of
1949 consolidated it and did not
expose it http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/this-group-of-traditionalists-instead.html
Michael Davis, Romano Amerio,
Dietrich von Hildebrand were
not aware of the irrational premise
: Michael Mat, Chris Ferrara,
John Rao, James Bogle,
Joseph Shaw agree?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/michael-davis-romano-amerio-dietrich_11.html
Dietrich von Hildebrand were
not aware of the irrational premise
: Michael Mat, Chris Ferrara,
John Rao, James Bogle,
Joseph Shaw agree?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/michael-davis-romano-amerio-dietrich_11.html
Michael Davis, Romano Amerio,
Dietrich von Hildebrand were not
aware of the irrational premise
which makes Vatican Council
II a break with Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/michael-davis-romano-amerio-dietrich.html
Dietrich von Hildebrand were not
aware of the irrational premise
which makes Vatican Council
II a break with Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/michael-davis-romano-amerio-dietrich.html
Michael Mat, Chris Ferrara, John Rao
and James Bogle again spoke at
a conference and did not mention
that Vatican Council II
can be interpreted
without an irrational premise http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/michael-mat-chris-ferrara-john-rao-and.html
ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE, MICHAEL DAVIS MADE AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE: TRADITIONALISTS ARE STILL REELING
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/archbishop-lefebvre-michael-davis-made.html
-Lionel Andrades
https://harvestingthefruit.com/the-novus-ordo-stones-from-holy-mother/
ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE, MICHAEL DAVIS MADE AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE: TRADITIONALISTS ARE STILL REELING
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/archbishop-lefebvre-michael-davis-made.html
-Lionel Andrades
https://harvestingthefruit.com/the-novus-ordo-stones-from-holy-mother/
https://harvestingthefruit.com/the-novus-ordo-stones-from-holy-mother/