APRIL 12, 2017
Letter of the Holy
Office 1949 teaches anathema contradicts Jesus' teaching in John 3:5 and the
Council of Trent http://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2017/04/letter-of- holy-office-1949-teaches.html
OCTOBER
13, 2016 An
error was made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and much of the Vatican
Council II theology is based on this error.This is what I know http://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2016/10/an-error- was-made-in-letter-of-holy. html
JANUARY
18, 2016 Archbishop
Lefebvre did not see the same wrong reasoning, as the inference in the
Letter(1949) used in Vatican Council II.The SSPX has still not noticed this
!!! http://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2016/01/ archbishop-lefebvre-accepted- inference.html
JANUARY
7, 2016 Letter
of the Holy Office 1949 : from meaningless non applicable theology to
heresy http://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2016/01/letter-of- holy-office-1949-from.html
DECEMBER
30, 2015 The
Letter made a mistake. Archbishop Lefebvre did not notice it. ttp://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2015/12/the- letter-made-mistakearchbishop. html
MARCH
14, 2015
After 1949 the error came in a big way into the Catholic Church http://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2015/03/after- 1949-error-came-in-big-way- into.html
After 1949 the error came in a big way into the Catholic Church http://eucharistandmission.
T raditionalists reject Vatican Council II with heresy
and accept the Letter of the Holy Office with heresy. They do not see how the
two are connected http://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2014/06/ traditionalists-reject- vatican-council.html#links
FEBRUARY 13, 2015
Bishop Schneider uses the common Gnostic interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II
FEBRUARY 13, 2015
In itself the baptism of desire is not a problem. It is when it is considered an exception to the dogma that the error arises
The
baptism of desire is accepted by me since it is not an exception to the dogma
even when it occurs and it is known only to God http:// eucharistandmission.blogspot. it/2015/02/the-baptism-of- desire-is-accepted-by-me.html
The
lawful authorities were saying that there were exceptions to the strict
interpretation of the dogma http:// eucharistandmission.blogspot. it/2015/02/i-have-received-e- mail-today.html
JULY 28, 2017
So objectively there were no exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the so Letter of the Holy Office was a classic 'oops'.
SEPTEMBER
13, 2017
Lay Catholics must reject the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office conclusion : expedient religious are teaching it in Catechism classes
APRIL 12, 2017
Let Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston be anathema?They were teaching heresy. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire and they postulated exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
JANUARY 25, 2017
Cardinal
Richard Cushing and Nostra Aetate picked up the objective error from the Letter
of the Holy Office 1949
OCTOBER
10, 2016
The
Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not required that a person be
incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation while the Catechism of
Pius X says it is necessary. http://eucharistandmission. blogspot.it/2016/10/the- letter-of-holy-office-says- that-it.html
-Lionel Andrades
-Lionel Andrades
February 15, 2018
5- To re-interpret Vatican Council II and switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism as a theology review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
February 15, 2018
1-5 : To re-interpret Vatican Council II and switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism as a theology review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office (1949) 1-5
No comments:
Post a Comment