Wednesday, April 11, 2018

Soon LifeSites and Rorate Caeili will be saying again that we need a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II

A video of the late Cardinal Carlo Caffarra opens the Rome conference,
With invisible for us baptism of desire being considered visible for us, the official interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) was discarded with the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.This irrational reasoning was the New Theology at Vatican Council II.
The official teaching of the Church had been changed. This has been accepted by the speakers at the Conference last Saturday, organized by the Friends of Cardinal Cafarra.They affirm the New Theology. So they accept a change in doctrine on salvation but only  oppose a change in morals.
Image result for Photo of Conference of Friends of Cardinal Caffarra
Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider also interpret invisible for us Lumen Gentium 8 as being a visible exception to EENS . They discard EENS as it was interpreted over the centuries.None of them objected on March 1,2018 when Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, told the journalist from Associated Press that Lumen Gentium 8 ( visible for him) was an exception ( since it refers to an explicit and objective case) to the Catholic Church's traditional understanding on it having the exclusiveness and superiority in salvation.
There was no comment from any one even though there are so many reports on line on this issue over the years.
Probably Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider and other conservatives, do not want to state that the Church teaches in Vatican Council II (AG 7) that all non Catholics  without faith and baptism, which is needed for salvation, are oriented to Hell and there are no exceptions mentioned in the Council-text.
This would be Vatican Council II for them, with LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc referring to personally unknown people in the present time,just hypothetical cases.
Image result for Photo of Conference of Friends of Cardinal Caffarra
So Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider do not want to affirm the traditional doctrines on salvation.
To reject EENS with allegedly visible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water-  is not heresy?
What the Church taught for centuries on EENS is put aside with known cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16), outside the Church. As if we could know who they are.
Image result for Photo of Conference of Friends of Cardinal Caffarra
Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider also did not object in March 2016 when Pope Benedict in an interview in Avvenire said that EENS was  no more like it was in the past.One Magisterium changes the teachings of another  Magisterium.
Now Burke and Schneider object to the change in moral teachings, expressed in Amoris Laetitia and which is being implemented in many countries, but do not object to the official change in our understanding of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood, invincible ignorance, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II.
What was official in the past is no more offical and they have no objection.What was considered invisible in the past is now considered visible and is the basis of a new theology and new ecclesiology and they have no objections.
Image result for Photo of Conference of Friends of Cardinal Caffarra
This was why Cardinal Kasper before the Synod said in an interview that if ecclesiology ( past exclusivist ecclesiology) could be changed then why cannot the Eucharist be given to the divorced and remarried.
No one told him that ecclesiology has not been changed.Since it has been changed and this is accepted by Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider.
Soon Bishop Schneider will given another interview to Lifesites News or Rorate Caeili, or to both,  asking for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II  as if he still does not understand what  I write here.
The editors of LifeSites and Rorate Caeli know the opposition they will draw if they interpret Vatican Council II without the irrational premise.So they do not report on this.They safely interpret Vatican Council II as it has been interpreted for 50 years.
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: