There are no comments on it and there are no discussions There is a kind of news blackout on Cardinal Raymond Burke's May 18, 2018 statement, which was reported by LifeSitesNews.com.
LifeSites needs to develop that report and ask Cardinal Burke for further information and clarification, on a subject the leftist media wants to keep suppressed.
1.It is important for Life Sites to clarify that Cardinal Raymond Burke has not rejected Vatican Council II.Yet he supports the Social Reign of Christ the King.
He has not rejected Vatican Council II and yet he affirms exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church with other religions being false.
He has not rejected Vatican Council II and yet he affirms exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church with other religions being false.
He says the true Church of Christ subsists in only the Catholic Church (LG 8).So for him LG 8 is not a reference to an objective exception to EENS. It is a reference to an invisible person, a hypothetical case, a theoretical possibility, speculation with good will.He reads LG 8 differently and not like Cardinal Luiz Ladaria (March 1,2018).
2.Since Cardinal Burke has said that other religions are false ; false paths to salvation, he indicates that he has rejected Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).Instead he is affirming Vatican Council II (Feeneyite). He does not cite Vatican Council II with Cushingite reasoning.Since Vatican Council II (Cushingite) would suggest that there is known salvation outside the Church. So then they could not say that other religions are false paths to salvation. So Cardinal Burke is affirming Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite).He is not affirming Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) which would suggest that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, refer to known people saved outside the Church.In other words there are practical exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).
3. The liberal media cannot write off Cardinal Burke as a traditionalist who rejects Vatican Council II. They mean Vatican Council II (C) of course. They assume he rejects Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and this is the only interpretation of the Council which they know of.
Every good Catholic should reject Vatican Council II (C).
For example, on his blog the sedevacantist TradCatKnight supports the Social Reign of Christ the King but like the liberals he assumes Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is a rupture with EENS and the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King.
He does not know that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).Only Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite).But this is the single interpretation of Vatican Council II known to the sedevacantists and liberals.
So LifeSitesNews must clarify that with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) there is no rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors and the past exclusivist ecclesiolgy of the Catholic Church. So in 2018 with EENS and Vatican Council II, Feeneyite, there can only be an ecumenism of return.
4.So LifeSites could discuss the difference between Vatican Council II Feeneyite and Cushingite. They could talk to Cardinal Raymond Burke about it. They could discuss how the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) can be interpreted with either, Feeneyism or Cushingism. They can discuss how BOD, BOB and I.I mentioned in Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura and the Catechisms of Pius X and Trent are not explicit and objective cases. Cardinal Burke would agree that they refer to invisible people and so they never ever were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
5.Similarly they can discuss how Pope Benedict made a mistake in March 2016(Avvenire) when he said that EENS today was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. He said that Vatican Council II is 'a development'. LifeSites News must note that he meant Vatican Council II (Cushingite) was a rupture with EENS as it was known to the Jesuits in Middle Ages, but not Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).He did not want to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) if he knew about it.
6.Similarly Cardinal Ladaria on March 1, 2018 at the Placuit Deo Press Conference told the lady journalist from the Associated Press, that the Church no more holds the old understanding of salvation.No more does the Church have an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation for Cardinal Ladaria.
Cardinal Ladaria brazenly said, expecting no opposition and there was none from LifeSites at least, that Lumen Gentium 8 was an exception for him to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
How can invisible and unknown people in 2018 be an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite) for him? In general we humans cannot see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water and Catholic Faith.We cannot name any one in 2018 who will be going to Heaven even though he or she is outside the Catholic Church.
He was really referring to LG 8 not being invisible and hypothetical. Otherwise for him, LG 8 could not be an exception to the old ecclesiology of the Church.
7. So on March 18, 2018 Cardinal Raymond Burke at the Voice of the Family Conference, interpreted LG 8 in harmony with the past ecclesiology of the Church.He used reason. LG 8 referred to non existing people in our reality.So for Cardinal Burke they were not exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.He could affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King.
So the cardinals and bishops must be asked if they, and the rest of the Church, can interpret Vatican Council II, EENS, Catechisms etc with Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology instead of the present Cushingism which carries the hermeneutic of rupture. Can they choose the interpretation of Cardinal Raymond Burke instead of the present two popes and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j ?
-Lionel Andrades
Every good Catholic should reject Vatican Council II (C).
For example, on his blog the sedevacantist TradCatKnight supports the Social Reign of Christ the King but like the liberals he assumes Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is a rupture with EENS and the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King.
He does not know that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).Only Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite).But this is the single interpretation of Vatican Council II known to the sedevacantists and liberals.
So LifeSitesNews must clarify that with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) there is no rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors and the past exclusivist ecclesiolgy of the Catholic Church. So in 2018 with EENS and Vatican Council II, Feeneyite, there can only be an ecumenism of return.
4.So LifeSites could discuss the difference between Vatican Council II Feeneyite and Cushingite. They could talk to Cardinal Raymond Burke about it. They could discuss how the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) can be interpreted with either, Feeneyism or Cushingism. They can discuss how BOD, BOB and I.I mentioned in Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura and the Catechisms of Pius X and Trent are not explicit and objective cases. Cardinal Burke would agree that they refer to invisible people and so they never ever were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
5.Similarly they can discuss how Pope Benedict made a mistake in March 2016(Avvenire) when he said that EENS today was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. He said that Vatican Council II is 'a development'. LifeSites News must note that he meant Vatican Council II (Cushingite) was a rupture with EENS as it was known to the Jesuits in Middle Ages, but not Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).He did not want to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) if he knew about it.
6.Similarly Cardinal Ladaria on March 1, 2018 at the Placuit Deo Press Conference told the lady journalist from the Associated Press, that the Church no more holds the old understanding of salvation.No more does the Church have an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation for Cardinal Ladaria.
Cardinal Ladaria brazenly said, expecting no opposition and there was none from LifeSites at least, that Lumen Gentium 8 was an exception for him to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
How can invisible and unknown people in 2018 be an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite) for him? In general we humans cannot see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water and Catholic Faith.We cannot name any one in 2018 who will be going to Heaven even though he or she is outside the Catholic Church.
He was really referring to LG 8 not being invisible and hypothetical. Otherwise for him, LG 8 could not be an exception to the old ecclesiology of the Church.
7. So on March 18, 2018 Cardinal Raymond Burke at the Voice of the Family Conference, interpreted LG 8 in harmony with the past ecclesiology of the Church.He used reason. LG 8 referred to non existing people in our reality.So for Cardinal Burke they were not exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.He could affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King.
So the cardinals and bishops must be asked if they, and the rest of the Church, can interpret Vatican Council II, EENS, Catechisms etc with Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology instead of the present Cushingism which carries the hermeneutic of rupture. Can they choose the interpretation of Cardinal Raymond Burke instead of the present two popes and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j ?
-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 6, 2018
If Michael Voris supports Cardinal Raymond Burke's statement on the Social Reign of Christ the King and the dogma EENS he may not be able to receive the Sacraments in Detroit
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/if-michael-voris-supports-cardinal.html
UNE 5, 2018
CMTV not allowed to comment on Dr.Robert Fastiggi's mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/cmtv-not-allowed-to-comment-on-drrobert.html
JUNE 5, 2018
CMTV being censored ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/cmtv-being-censored.html
JUNE 5, 2018
Did Church Militant TV receive a warning from the Chancery in Detroit not to report or discuss Cardinal Burke's statement ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/did-church-militant-tv-receive-warning.html
JUNE 5, 2018
Cardinal Burke not reported by liberal media -and also Michael Voris and CMTV http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/cardinal-burke-not-reported-by-liberal.html
JUNE 5, 2018
Michael Voris hides the truth about Catholic salvation on the CMTV website(FAQ) : Peter and Michael Dimond who are honest are criticized
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/michael-voris-hides-truth-about.html
Cardinal Burke and Pope Francis show us that there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II : one is a continuity with EENS and the other is a rupture
JUNE 4, 2018
Rupture and continuity with the past - Pope Francis and Cardinal Raymond Burke http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/rupture-and-continuity-with-past-pope.html
JUNE 4, 2018
Cardinal Burke and Pope Francis show us that there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II : one is a continuity with EENS and the other is a rupture
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/cardinal-burke-and-pope-francis-show-us.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/cardinal-burke-and-pope-francis-show-us.html
JUNE 4, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke says other religions are false religions while Pope Francis says Orthodox Christians do not need to convert into the Catholic Church. Some time back he said the same for Protestants
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/cardinal-raymond-burke-says-other.html
No comments:
Post a Comment