Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr. Anthony Cekada, sedevacantists, are still not responding to the reports on this blog.They are interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism and then blaming the Council. They know that I interpret the Council with Feeneyism. However if they talk about it or accept it they would be saying that Vatican Council II is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite).
So they say nothing.
All these years they have interpreted the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as being exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesia nulla salus(EENS). So their understanding was that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church. They were examples of visible non Catholics saved outside the Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.This is Cushingism.
Now I interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as being invisible cases and so are not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. This is Feeneyism.
They will not comment.
Then since I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, the Council is not a rupture with Tradition. But for them LG 8, GS 22 , LG 16 etc are exceptions to EENS and the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return . So they reject Vatican Council II.Again they do not comment. I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism while they use an irrational premise to interpret the Council. They did the same all these years, also with EENS. They chose EENS(Cushingite) and criticized EENS( Feeneyite).
For me 'the red is not an exception to the blue' but for the two of them and the other sedevacantists at their seminary in Florida, 'the red is an exception to the blue'.1
I have pointed this out many time. There is no comment from them.-Lionel Andrades
1
JULY 4, 2019
The Bologna School interprets Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf says he supports this interpretation.He has not written about how Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the red not being an exception to the blue.
The Bologna School interprets Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf says he supports this interpretation.He has not written about how Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the rednot being an exception to the blue.
Since 1965 Vatican Council II is wrongly being interpreted with the red being an exception to the blue and non one has corrected the error.
The sedevacantists Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA still interpret Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue.This is inspite of so many reports on line on this subject and e-mails sent to them.
Similarly sedevacatists Bishop Donald Sanborn at his seminary in Florida will not state that Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents can be interpreted with the red not being an exception to the blue.
In the Diocese of Manchester, USA the sedevacantist community, Congregatio Mariae Reginau Immaculatae(CMRI),under Bishop Mark Pivarunas, also interpret Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue.
Similarly Bishop Williamson and the SSPX groups do not discuss this issue and correct the error in public.
The Diocese of Manchester needs to help the CMRI community and not condemn as not being Catholic.They have to be shown that with the red not being an exception to the blue, the Council does not contradict the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.So then there is no reason for the CMRI to go into sedevacantism based upon Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades
JULY 4, 2019
Vatican Documents are interpreted with the red being an exception to the blue
The Vatican Document released by the Commission for Relations with the Jews1 interpreted Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue.So it is flawed.
So also the Balamand Declaration and the Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans.
They are based upon the same error.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith needs to issue a clarifiction and acknowledge the mistake.
-Lionel Andrades
_______________________
_______________________
JUNE 29, 2019
The Joint Statement of the Catholics and Lutherans on Justification and the Balamand Declaration were false. Lutherans and Orthodox Christians do not have the faith needed for salvation.Pope Benedict was a Cushingite who rejected EENS
NOVEMBER 1, 2017
Balamand Declaration with Orthodox Christians and Declaration on Justification with Lutherans null and void : wrongly interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errorshttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/11/balamand-declaration-with-ortodox.html
OCTOBER 31, 2017
Vatican-Lutheran Joint Declaration on Justification was null since the Catholic side rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and wrongly re-interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/balamand-declaration-with-ortodox.html
Popes since the time of Pius XII have in public used irrational, non traditional and heretical Cushingism as a theology - 2 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/popes-since-time-of-pius-xii-have-in.html
Vatican’s Commission for Religious Relations with Jews uses irrational Cushingism as a basic theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/vaticans-commission-for-religious.html
John Vennari is not aware of the heresy of Cushingism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/john-vennari-is-not-aware-of-heresy-of.html
Irrational Cushingism theology in the Document on the Jews is also there in Redemptorist Missio and Dominus Iesus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/irrational-cushingism-theology-in.html
DECEMBER 15, 2015 Louie Verrecchio still doesn't get it :there is a theology of Cushingism and Feeneyism https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/12/louie-verrecchio-still-doesnt-get-it.html
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/relations-jews-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20151210_ebraismo-nostra-aetate_en.html
________________________________________
Vatican-Lutheran Joint Declaration on Justification was null since the Catholic side rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and wrongly re-interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/balamand-declaration-with-ortodox.html
Popes since the time of Pius XII have in public used irrational, non traditional and heretical Cushingism as a theology - 2 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/popes-since-time-of-pius-xii-have-in.html
Vatican’s Commission for Religious Relations with Jews uses irrational Cushingism as a basic theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/vaticans-commission-for-religious.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/vaticans-commission-for-religious.html
John Vennari is not aware of the heresy of Cushingism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/john-vennari-is-not-aware-of-heresy-of.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/john-vennari-is-not-aware-of-heresy-of.html
Irrational Cushingism theology in the Document on the Jews is also there in Redemptorist Missio and Dominus Iesus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/irrational-cushingism-theology-in.html
DECEMBER 15, 2015 Louie Verrecchio still doesn't get it :there is a theology of Cushingism and Feeneyism https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/12/louie-verrecchio-still-doesnt-get-it.html
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/relations-jews-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20151210_ebraismo-nostra-aetate_en.html________________________________________
JULY 10, 2019
If the SSPX bishops and priests are excommunicated they would simply have to respond like any normal Catholic and say they refuse to interpret Vatican Council II with the red passages being exceptions to the blue passages. The red passages are not exceptions to the blue passages for them and the CDF has made an objective mistake.
If the SSPX bishops and priests are excommunicated they would simply have to respond like any normal Catholic and say they refuse to interpret Vatican Council II with the red passages being exceptions to the blue passages.
The red passages are not exceptions to the blue passages for them and the CDF has made an objective mistake.
-Lionel Andrades
_____________________
MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS CAN BE INTERPRETED WITH 1)THE RED PASSAGESBEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES OR WITH 2)THE RED PASSAGESNOT BEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES.THE LATTER(2) IS RATIONAL.
If the SSPX bishops and priests are excommunicated they would simply have to respond like any normal Catholic and say they refuse to interpret Vatican Council II with the red passages being exceptions to the blue passages.
The red passages are not exceptions to the blue passages for them and the CDF has made an objective mistake.
-Lionel Andrades
_____________________
MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS CAN BE INTERPRETED WITH 1)THE RED PASSAGESBEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES OR WITH 2)THE RED PASSAGESNOT BEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES.THE LATTER(2) IS RATIONAL.
No comments:
Post a Comment