Monday, November 11, 2019
The Oxford University Press has produced many books on Vatican Council II based upon a false premise. A deceptive rupture is created with Catholic Tradition.
The Oxford University Press has produced many books on Vatican Council II based upon a false premise. So a deceptive rupture is created with Catholic Tradition. Vatican Council II is projected as a revolution or a new revelation in the Catholic Church.
Without the false premise the Council supports the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). There is no conflict with the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed.
Here are some of the many books published by the Oxford University Press.They are examples of unethical academic deception.
-Lionel Andrades
https://global.oup.com/academic/category/arts-and-humanities/religion/the-second-vatican-council/?cc=it&lang=en&
November 11, 2019
It's unethical for the Rector of St.Benet Hall and Cardinal Vince Nicols with the connivance of the present two popes, to project Vatican Council II as a rupture with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus
It's unethical for the Rector of St.Benet Hall and Cardinal Vince Nicols with the connivance of the present two popes, to project Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
Academically it is unethical for professors to teach students that Lumen Gentium is a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. This contradicts common sense aside from being a major theological and philosophical error.
The Council is really saying that Catholics believe all non Catholics need faith and baptism(John 3:5) to avoid Hell( Mark 16:16). This is Vatican Council II. This is the post Conciliar Church for those who believe.
So according to Vatican Council II the Muslim Mayor at Oxford , is lost, unless he converts into the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism'( AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846,1257).
The teachings of the Catholic Church cannot be changed with St. Benet Hall using false reasoning, a deceptive premise and inference.
The Rector and professors do not comment when I say Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past exclusive ecclesiology of the Church.
There is nothing in Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return.
Lumen Gentium 16, Gaudium et Specs 22 or Nostra Aetate do not contradict Feeneyite EENS.
Upon Ad Gentes 7 which has an ecclesiocentric ecclesiology, there can be the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in political legislation, since the priority is the saving of souls.-Lionel Andrades