Pope Francis’s interpretation of Vatican Council II is non
Magisterial.It is personal like that of Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed him.They did not
use the rational premise to interpret the Council but chose the irrational
premise and so created a false rupture with Tradition.
Dr.
Taylor Marshall has said that there are no explicit cases of Aquinas’ implicit
baptism of desire but the popes interpret Lumen Gentium ( case of the
catechumen) as referring to visible cases. LG 14 is explicit.If it was not
explicit for them it could not be a rupture with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam
nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors etc.So what is implicit is projected as
explicit and then the Church’s ecclesiocentric ecclesiology is said to be obsolete.
This
cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective
error.
There
are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in the present times said Bishop
Athanasius Schneider.LG 14 is not a visible case for him.
Yet
all the books on Vatican Council II are written with this invisible-visible mix
up and new ones are being written without any correction or clarfication from
the Vatican.
So
why should Catholics interpret LG 14 and the rest of Vatican Council II
irrationally like the popes and not like Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.
Taylor Marshall ?
Why
should not lay Catholics choose the rational option which is in harmony with
Tradition ?.
At the Hungarian and German Catholic seminaries in Rome, the young men are taught to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise ( invisible cases are visible in 1965-2021). Why should they be obedient to this error?
Why
must the Ecclesia Dei communities follow the same error and over look it in the
seminaries- liberal and traditionalist ? They are not affirming the faith.
Pope Francis is schismatic.The past Magisterium did not use the false premise.
This was also the error of Pope Benedict, before and after, he was appointed the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
There
is no unity in theology in doctrine since the official teaching is irrational,
schismatic and really non Magisterial.
Bishop
Athanasius Schnedier and Dr. Taylor Marshall say LG 14 is invisible and the
popes and cardinals say it is visible.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment