There can only be one rational interpretation of Vatican Council II it is the one with the Rational Premise and not the Irrational Premise and Life Site News does not choose it. John Henry Weston editor-in-chief of Life Site News interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 as being practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.I choose to see LG 8, as not being practical exceptions for the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
So for him, LG 8 etc
refer to visible people in the present times (1965-2022) saved outside the Catholic
Church, without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. Then LG 8 etc are
assumed wrongly, to be practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed which says
all must be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. This is his non-traditional
conclusion.
For me, LG 8 etc refer
to invisible people in the present times, so they cannot be practical
exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors or an ecumenism of return and there being
no salvation outside the Catholic Church. So my conclusion is traditional.
So his False Premise is
invisible non Catholics saved outside the Church are visible and my
Rational Premise is invisible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church
are invisible.
Since are premises are
different are conclusions are also different. He rejects the Syllabus of Errors
and the Athanasius Creed with his irrational new theology based upon the False
Premise (invisible cases are visible).I do not have to reject the past
Magisterial Documents.
I am not rejecting the
theoretical possibility of someone being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), the
baptism of desire(BOD) and baptism of blood(BOB), outside the Church, since everything is
possible with God, including there being only Catholics in Heaven.
However for me,
theoretical possibilities should not be projected as objective examples of
salvation in the present times. They should not be mistaken as practical
exceptions for 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the
Catechism of Pope Pius X (24 Q, 27Q).
So now we have an EENS
with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance being exceptions
and an EENS,without them being exceptions.
Then there are also two
interpretations of the Athanasius Creed and the Nicene Creed. There is the
interpretation of John Henry Weston and mine.
On Vatican Council II
John Henry Weston is irrational and I am not.
The Life Site News correspondent in France, Jeanne Smits interprets Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise as does Bishop Roland Minnerath, the FSSP, the diocesan priests and the Latin laity, in Dijon, France. So she cannot tell Bishop Minnerath that he wrote his books interpreting Vatican Council II with the False Premise and not the Rational Premise and so his non-traditional conclusion is artificial and false. She cannot tell him to affirm the Athanasius Creed and Vatican Council II (Rational).
She cannot tell him that Vatican Council II (Rational)
contradicts the books he wrote on the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
She cannot ask the diocesan priests at Dijon, who offer the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass, why do they not affirm the dogma EENS interpreted rationally with BOD, BOB and I.I not being exceptions. Also why do they not interpret Vatican Council ( Rational ) in which LG 8 etc are interpreted rationally and so they are not exceptions for the Athanasius Creed ?
Why cannot this be the
rational, traditional and common old theology at Holy Mass in Latin and the vernacular in France ?
Life Site News supports Bishop Roland Minnerath
and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in their pro-left campaign against the Latin Mass and those Catholics who want to affirm Vatican Council II ( Rational ) at the Novus Ordo Mass all over the world.-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 13, 2022
The Latin laity at Dijon, France must ask Bishop Roland Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally in public and admit that he made an objective error in the books he wrote. He interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise
The Latin laity at Dijon, France must ask Bishop Roland Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally in public and admit that he made an objective error in the books he wrote. He interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise.
They should ask him to affirm the Athanasius Creed in harmony with Vatican Council II (Rational) and interpret all Magisterial Documents rationally and ask the diocesan priests and laity to do the same.
If Bishop Roland Minnerath does not interpret the Creeds according to their original meaning it is a mortal sin of faith. We cannot change the meaning of the Creeds with the use of the common False Premise. -Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 11, 2022
Parents at Dijon, France who are informed, must demand that the diocesan priests and those from the religious communities, only interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise and support the traditional French ecclesiocentrism like that of St. Joan of Arc and the Vendees.
At First Holy Communion classes in Dijon, France, these days, the FSSP priests are not there for the Latin laity. The children are not being taught by traditionalists (Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest) that the Catholic Church teaches today with a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II ( AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846 etc) that outside the Church there is no salvation. All must be Catholic to go to Heaven (AG 7 etc). Neither is this taught to the children by the diocesan priests at the Novus Ordo Mass and other liturgies in Dijon.
Instead the FSSP error is repeated. The children are told that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology (Athanasius Creed) of France, eldest daughter of the Catholic Church.
Parents at Dijon, who are informed, must demand that the diocesan priests and those from the religious communities, only interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise and support the traditional French ecclesiocentrism like that of St. Joan of Arc and the Vendees.
The Rational Premise will end the theological epidemic and the whole Church can return to Tradition and not only those who go for the Latin Mass.-Lionel Andrades