Pope Benedict went without
putting things straight and Cardinal Ladaria seems to want to do the same. Like
Pope Benedict he chooses the False Premise (Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible
person in the present times, saved outside the Catholic Church) and False Inference (LG 16 is a visible example of salvation outside the Church and
so an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus). So his False Conclusion is that Vatican Council II (LG
16 etc.) is a rupture with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc.).
This is Cardinal Ladaria’s
False Reasoning; a False Philosophy which he does not deny. Neither do the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) deny this common error. They
officially approve it.
This issue is not being
reported by the media. Neither do any of the cardinals’ comment on this.
This error has spread
throughout the Church. It has spread like the Arian heresy of past times.
I have e-mailed these blog
posts to Cardinal Ladaria and there is no comment.
There is no response also from
Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar, Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire,
USA.
They are not telling the Jewish
Left that they will avoid the False Premise and Inference in the interpretation
of Vatican Council II.
Cardinal Ladaria is dishonest
on this issue and is allowing the error to be taught throughout the world.
He was dishonest on Amoris
Laetitia. There cannot be changes in faith and morals based upon a Vatican
Council II which is a break with Tradition when interpreted irrationally.
The Council can also be
interpreted rationally. Then there is no break with Tradition. So Cardinal
Ladaria cannot justify Amoris Laetitia based upon Vatican Council II (irrational).
It is the same for the Catholic
–Lutheran Declaration on Justification. The Lutherans are outside the Church
according to Vatican Council II (rational) but he does not mention it. The
Council says all need faith and the baptism, of water for salvation. The
reference is to Catholic faith and the baptism of water, in general, in the
Catholic Church. LG 8, 14, 16 etc. are not objective exceptions for Ad Gentes 7
and the dogma EENS. Lutherans do not have Catholic faith.
The Abu Dhabi Declaration also cannot
be based upon Vatican Council II (irrational), Cardinal Ladaria would know
this. Also the ecclesiology of the Synods cannot have its foundation upon
Vatican Council II irrational. He does not talk about this dishonesty.
It is unethical for Cardinal Luiz Ladari sj to
allow Massimo Faggioli, Alberto Melloni and Cardinal Matteo Zuppi to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and pretend this is the norm for the Council. -Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment