Fr.Georges
de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA,
must clarify for the people in NH if he interprets Vatican Council II with
Cushingism or Feeneyism and is this honest, Catholic and legal ?
Does he expect the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, St. Benedict Center, New
Hampshire, to also interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism? Does he expect
all the Catholic educational institutions and all the religious communities and
organizations in New Hampshire, to be dishonest with Cushingism? How can he
legally be a Cushingite?
Pope
Francis, Cardinal-designate Victor Manuel Fernandez and Bishop Peter Libasci,
the bishop of Manchester, NH and the Judicial Vicr in NH, Fr. Georges de Laire, are also interpreting Vatican
Council II with irrational Cushingism.
There are
also articles/ reports by Brother Andre Marie micm, on the website
Catholicism.org in which he has interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally.
Those reports are politically correct with the Left and the diocese.He also
received his academic degree in theology, since he interpreted the Council
irrationally and not rationally.He has also
approved/recommended books on the Catholicism.org webiste, written by Roberto dei Mattei, Mons. Joseph Clifford
Fenton etc who interpreted the Council and other Magisterial Documents with irrational
Cushingism. They were Cushingites.This is a common error in the Church. Cushingism has spread throughout the Church.
Brother
Andre Marie micm and Brother Thomas Augustine micm, at the St. Benedict Centers
in Richmond, NH and Still River, MA were respectively Cushingites on Vatican Council
II and they were Feeneyites on EENS.
Also Brother
Andre Marie’s Doctrinal Statement on the Catholicism.org website, in response to
the Decree of Prohibitions of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF/DDF), Vatican on the website of the Diocese of Manchester,NH does not mention if the Cushingism of the CDF/DDF and the Diocese of
Manchester, is Magisterial or not.Is Pope Francis, the CDF and Bishop Peter Libasci Magisterial with public Cushingism?
The St.
Benedict Center NH conferences have been held with Vatican Council II
interpreted irrationally. Also there have been reviews and reports in general
on different subjects in which the writers/commentators have interpreted Vatican
Council II irrationally and they have been posted on the Catholicism.org
website, with no mention of the error.
It would
seem as if Fr. Leonard Feeney and Fr. Francis micm, the Superior of the St.
Benedict Center in NH, were only interpreting Vatican Council II, irrationally.There are no comments by Fr. Leonard Feeney and Brother Francis micm, on Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
Brother
Andre Marie micm, needs to issue a clarification/correction on the website of Catholicism.org
and then point out the same errors on the website of the Diocese of Manchester, NH.
At Boston
College and throughout New England in USA, they interpret Vatican Council
II irrationally i.e. LG 8,14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are exceptions for
Feeneyite EENS. In other words, they refer to physically visible cases; known people
saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times. Only in this way they
could be practical exceptions for EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. But we know
that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, etc refer to only hypothetical cases for us. So
they are not exceptions for an ecumenism of return to the Church, of the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
Vatican
Council II (LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3 etc) does not contradict the Catechism of
Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q-outside the Church no salvation).
The Council
is not a break with Tradition for me. We have a choice in the interpretation of
Vatican Council II. We can interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as referring to
invisible or visible cases in 1965-2023.
Fr. John
Hardon sj., Fr. William Most, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Archbishop Marcel
Lefebvre and Ludwig Ott were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally i.e.
LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc referred to physically visible cases. This was the objetive mistake of also the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.-Lionel Andrades
In principle a pope has to be a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite.A Cushingite cannot be a pope. Since Cushingism produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. It produces heresy and schism. Presently the whole Church is infected with Cushingism. Cushingites accept Magisterial Documents but always interpret them irrationally.
In principle a pope has to be a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite.A Cushingite cannot be a pope. Since Cushingism produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. It produces heresy and schism.
Presently the whole Church is infected with Cushingism. Cushingites accept Magisterial Documents but always interpret them irrationally. Pope Pius XII was a Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. Pope Francis is a Cushingite in Traditionis Custode and Amoris Laetitia. Also Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was a Cushingite on Vatican Council II.
Sister Marie Philomena micm, Director of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom in New Hampshire is a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II.
You cannot be a Cushingite and be a Catholic.If a pope, cardinal or bishop forces you to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, refuse to do so.
- Lionel Andrades
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1991106437591715&set=ecnf.100064429129977https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/08/in-principle-pope-has-to-be-feeneyite.html
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
No comments:
Post a Comment