Monday, May 29, 2023
We are back to the old Church in the Catholic Church
Every Catholic is obliged to accept the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)
which was defined by two Church Councils, the Fourth Lateran Council
(1215) and the Council of Florence(1442).These Councils are not contradicted by
hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance.
So Vatican Council II (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) does not have any practical exception for EENS.
This was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney and
the St. Benedict Center of his time. So he said that there are no visible cases
of the baptism of desire. He meant that they do not exist in our reality. They
cannot be seen. They are invisible cases of people on earth.
So when Vatican Council II (LG 8, 14, 16
etc) does not contradict the dogma EENS there cannot be a New Evangelization,
New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology etc.
We are back to the old evangelization,
traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. We
return to the old 'ecumenism of return' to the Catholic Church. We are back to
the old theology which says outside the Church there is no salvation, there is
no known salvation. So we are back to the old Church in the Catholic Church.Rome has come back to the Faith. - Lionel Andrades
There is a split in the Society of St. Pius (SSPX). There are two doctrinal groups with two doctrinal positions.
There is a split in the Society of St. Pius
(SSPX) .There are two doctrinal groups with two doctrinal positions. One group
interprets Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc, with the
irrational premise to produce a break with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).It
defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
The other group interprets the Council
rationally and supports the Fourth Lateran Council. They will be interpreting
all Magisterial Documents rationally and in harmony with Tradition. But there
will be a rupture Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre on Vatican Council II, the Creeds,
Catechisms, EENS etc.
So there is a standoff now.
The group which wants to go along with
the irrational interpretation of Magisterial Documents is supported by the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and Pope Francis.
The traditionalist group which wants to interpret the baptism of desire etc rationally and so support the Fourth Lateran Council which did not mention any exceptions for EENS, went public in 2012.
They expressed themselves in the SSPX General Chapter Statement when
Bishop Bernard Fellay was the Superior General.1 The Statement of course was rejected
by the Jewish Left and so also the Vatican.
The Fellay group is not really a traditionalist group. Since they interpret the Nicene and Athanasius Creed
and the old Church Councils irrationally. They also do not deny that they are
interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally.
For example, the understanding of Church ( ecclesiology) of the Roman Missal of the 17th century is not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( rational) i.e. the Council with LG 8,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being only hypothetical, theoretical and speculative cases. So there are no exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
There is no 'new magisterum' of Cardinal Arthur
Roche. But with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 16
etc are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions
for EENS, there is a New Theology. The New Theology says outside the Catholic
Church there is known salvation. So now we have Pope Benedict’s New Ecumenism,
New Ecclesiology, New Evangelization, New Canon Law etc. It’s a new Church
within the Catholic Church.
Bishop Bernard Fellay refused to correct
this mistake. It was the same with Bishop Richard Williamson and the new
bishops he has ordained. He interprets the Council irrationally like the Fellay
group.So the issue is no more traditionalist and liberal but - is Vatican Council II, rational or irrational.
The SSPX has built a new church in Kansas
City, USA. This was possible since the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II like
the USCCB bishops.The SSPX leadership in the USA dare not tell the faithful to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. They are keeping this issue hidden.
For the SSPX and the USCCB, LG 8, LG 14,
G 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
So they imply that these are objective and visible cases. These are known non
Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times.
This is irrational. We cannot see people
saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire. They cannot be in
Heaven and on earth at the same time. We cannot see or meet invisible people on
earth.
So the norm for salvation is still faith
and baptism (AG 7) and LG 8 etc are not objective exceptions for LG 16 which is
cited in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846) under the title Outside the
Church No Salvation.
In Rome, Fr. Federico Montani, who
offers Mass at the SSPX chapel is unable to say that outside the Catholic
Church is a dogma defined by two Church Councils in 1215 and 1442.He is also
unable to say that invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 16 etc mentioned in Vatican
Council II, are not exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since
the SSPX at Econe are divided on this issue.
All these years the SSPX have been saying that there are exceptions for the dogma EENS and they also have been saying that there are no exceptions. They have been running with the hares and hunting with the hounds.
The SSPX priests are unable to issue a
statement on this issue nor speak with me in Rome.The SSPX today is interpreting the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance like the liberals at Boston College, who dismissed Catholic college professors and Fr. Leonard Feeney.2 - Lionel Andrades
1
https://sspx.org/en/sspx-2012-general-chapter-statement
2
SEPTEMBER 14, 2014
Their father was removed from Boston College when the President Fr.Keleher used an irrationality to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus
BRO.FRANCIS (DR.MALUF) WAS DISMISSED AS A PROFESSOR AT BOSTON COLLEGE SINCE THE PRESIDENT WAS IN HERESY AND WANTED ALL PROFESSORS TO ACCEPT AN IRRATIONALITY IN IN INTERPRETATION OF EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS, NOW KNOWN AS THE CUSHINGISM VERSION.
Cushingism has now been incorporated in magisterial documents and is used in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. So a Vatican Council II which is pastoral is in conflict with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla slaus.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2014
Boston College used an irrational premise to remove Catholic professors including Dr.Maluf whose daughters are American religious sisters
__________________________________________________
SEPTEMBER 15, 2014
Vatican Council II itself supports the SSPX General Chapter Statement- no one is discussing this point
OCTOBER 4, 2017
Secret of SSPX General Chapter Statement unknown to bishops : there are no possibile exceptions to EENS in Vatican Council II
MONDAY, JULY 30, 2018
Repost : SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 contradicts the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 contradicts the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
This singer and song should be accompanied by a choir
MAY 28, 2023
St. John of the Cross
“Songs of the Soul
On a dark night,
Inflamed by love-longing -
O exquisite risk! -
Undetected I slipped away.
My house, at last, grown still.
Secure in the darkness,
I climbed the secret ladder in disguise -
O exquisite risk! -
Concealed by the darkness.
My house, at last, grown still.
That sweet night: a secret.
Nobody saw me;
I did not see a thing.
No other light, no other guide
Than the one burning in my heart.
This light led the way
More clearly than the risen sun
To where he was waiting for me
- The one I knew so intimately -
In a place where no one could find us.
O night, that guided me!
O night, sweeter than sunrise!
O night, that joined lover with Beloved!
Lover transformed in Beloved!
Upon my blossoming breast,
Which I cultivated just for him,
He drifted into sleep,
And while I caressed him,
A cedar breeze touched the air.
Wind blew down from the tower,
Parting the locks of his hair.
With his gentle hand
He wounded my neck
And all my senses were suspended.
I lost myself. Forgot myself.
I lay my face against the Beloved's face.
Everything fell away and I left myself behind,
Abandoning my cares
Among the lilies, forgotten.”
― Saint John of the Cross, Dark Night of the Soul1.On a dark night, Kindled in love with yearnings—oh, happy chance!—
I went forth without being observed, My house being now at rest.
2. In darkness and secure, By the secret ladder, disguised—oh, happy chance!—
In darkness and in concealment, My house being now at rest.
3. In the happy night, In secret, when none saw me,
Nor I beheld aught, Without light or guide, save that which burned in my heart.
4. This light guided me More surely than the light of noonday
To the place where he (well I knew who!) was awaiting me— A place where none appeared.
5. Oh, night that guided me, Oh, night more lovely than the dawn,
Oh, night that joined Beloved with lover, Lover transformed in the Beloved!
6. Upon my flowery breast, Kept wholly for himself alone,
There he stayed sleeping, and I caressed him, And the fanning of the cedars made a breeze.
7. The breeze blew from the turret As I parted his locks;
With his gentle hand he wounded my neck And caused all my senses to be suspended.
8. I remained, lost in oblivion; My face I reclined on the Beloved.
All ceased and I abandoned myself, Leaving my cares forgotten among the lilies.
-St.John of the Cross, Dark Night of the Soul (poem).