In 2003, when I spoke to Fr. Sebastian
Vazhakhala m.c he was not willing to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
slaus (EENS).Lumen Gentium 16 was an exception for EENS him. In other words, it
referred to a visible and known case in our reality, someone saved outside the
Church. Now in 2024 he knows that Lumen Gentium 16 is an invisible case. So
it is not an exception for Tradition. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc
are hypothetical cases for him. So now he is saying the same thing
as me.
So there is nothing in Vatican
Council II to contradict Feeneyite EENS i.e. the EENS of the Council of
Florence 1442 etc. This has to be acknowledged publically by Cardinal Fernandez
and the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the (DCF). In the trial of Archbishop
Carlo Maria Vigano Cardinal Fernandez and Pope Francis interpreted Vatican
Council II, confusing Lumen Gentium 16.
The norm for salvation is
faith and baptism. The norm is not being saved in invincible ignorance or the
baptism of desire. So in general all Jews and Muslim, and other non Catholics,
according to Vatican Council II (AG 7), need to enter the Catholic Church for
salvation from Hell. The norm for salvation is not being saved in invincible
ignorance. - Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
Vigano trial violates Church and secular law : Vatican Council II was interpreted deceptively
MARCH 16, 2024
We are all saying the same thing when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment