Fr. Paolo
Boumis the Parish Priest at Sant Agapito, Largo Preneste, near Termini, Rome,
his assistant priests and the rest of the parish have only one option now. They
have to interpret LG 8,14,15,16 etc rationally. So the approved Catechists in
the parish would be dishonest if future catechesis was based upon Vatican
Council II interpreted irrationally. They
cannot continue to interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as being visible people in
the present times saved outside the Catholic Church.
Morally we only have the
rational option. So this would be the only interpretation of the Auxiliary
Bishops of Rome and the religious communities. Annual, renewal of vows will
have its foundation only on Vatican Council II interpreted
ethically.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-parish-priest-has-to-tell-his.html
OCTOBER 19, 2023
Father Paolo Boumis, Parish Priest, of the Church of St. Agapito, near Largo Preneste-Porta Maggiore, Rome, holds the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He is a Feeneyite on EENS just like me.
Father Paolo Boumis. Parish Priest, of the Church of St. Agapito, near Largo Preneste-Porta Maggiore, Rome, holds the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He is a Feeneyite on EENS just like me. He also interprets Vatican Council II rationally in harmony with EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) which did not mention any exceptions. He also interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church in synchrony with the past Catechisms and other Magisterial Documents. It is the same for the Missionaries of Charity of Mother Teresa, Rome and the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of the Rome Vicariate.This is possible since they all agree that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to invisible cases in 2023. They are always hypothetical cases and so they cannot be practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, in the present times. So their theology becomes traditional when they interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc rationally, i.e invisible people are physically invisible.They return to the past exclusivist ecclesiology and the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Though - many of the above names are denying the Faith in public.They do not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS in public. They suggest that there are exceptions for the dogma EENS, in other words that LG 8,14, 15, 16 refer to physically visible non Catholics, who are practical exceptions for the dogma EENS.This is dishonest.Suggesting that invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc are visible is unethical.I call this Cushingism. Cushingism is heretical, irrational, schismatic and non traditional.
Before Muslims, they present themselves as Cushingites and not Feeneyites. However technically, in private, they are Feeneyites when they interpret Vatican Council II etc rationally, i.e invisible cases of LG 8,14, 16 etc, are invisible in 2023. -Lionel Andrades